In‐situ Observations of Nanoscale Effects in Germanium Nanowire Growth with Ternary Eutectic Alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Vapour‐liquid‐solid (VLS) techniques are popular routes for the scalable synthesis of semiconductor nanowires. In this article, in‐situ electron microscopy is used to correlate the equilibrium content of ternary (Au0.75Ag0.25–Ge and Au0.65Ag0.35–Ge) metastable alloys with the kinetics, thermodynamics and diameter of Ge nanowires grown via a VLS mechanism. The shape and geometry of the heterogeneous interfaces between the liquid eutectic and solid Ge nanowires varies as a function of nanowire diameter and eutectic alloy composition. The behaviour of the faceted heterogeneous liquid–solid interface correlates with the growth kinetics of the nanowires, where the main growth facet at the solid nanowire–liquid catalyst drop contact line lengthens for faster nanowire growth kinetics. Pronounced diameter dependent growth kinetics, as inferred from liquid–solid interfacial behaviour, is apparent for the synthesised nanowires. Direct in‐situ microscopy observations facilitates the comparison between the nanowire growth behaviour from ternary (Au–Ag–Ge) and binary (Au–Ge) eutectic systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Chemistry & Analysis Group Department of Chemistry and the Tyndall National Institute University College Cork Cork Ireland
Centre for Research on Adaptive Nanostructures and Nanodevices (CRANN) Trinity College Dublin Dublin 2 Ireland
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl100161z10.1021/nl100161z ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.10680510.1103/PhysRevLett.102.106805 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0479610.1038/nature04796 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl203238e10.1021/nl203238e ↗
5. 10.1021/am301025310.1021/am3010253 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl301516z10.1021/nl301516z ↗
7. Liu Y.‐C. C. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21
8. 10.1021/nl803780710.1021/nl8037807 ↗
9. 10.1016/0022-0248(75)90105-010.1016/0022-0248(75)90105-0 ↗
10. Lewis B · 1978
11. 10.1021/nl101972210.1021/nl1019722 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl104267p10.1021/nl104267p ↗
13. Prince P. L. A
14. 10.1021/nl401250x10.1021/nl401250x ↗
15. 10.1021/nn101366w10.1021/nn101366w ↗
16. 10.1021/nl071963010.1021/nl0719630 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl801987j10.1021/nl801987j ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.05060110.1103/PhysRevE.80.050601 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat214010.1038/nmat2140 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp109588210.1021/jp1095882 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.02550310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.025503 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.20610110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.206101 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl102781510.1021/nl1027815 ↗
24. 10.1021/nl104238d10.1021/nl104238d ↗
25. 10.1021/cm101213710.1021/cm1012137 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20039010110.1002/adma.200390101 ↗
27. 10.1002/smll.20090176410.1002/smll.200901764 ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms295610.1038/ncomms2956 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.116349410.1126/science.1163494 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.19550210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.195502 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.04533510.1103/PhysRevB.75.045335 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20080375410.1002/adma.200803754 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.03160410.1103/PhysRevE.70.031604 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.113910510.1126/science.1139105 ↗
35. 10.1021/nn700148610.1021/nn7001486 ↗
36. 10.1021/cr900141g10.1021/cr900141g ↗
37. 10.1021/cg200667r10.1021/cg200667r ↗
38. 10.1021/cm401281y10.1021/cm401281y ↗
39. 10.1039/c3tc31123f10.1039/c3tc31123f ↗
40. 10.1021/cg301452d10.1021/cg301452d ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20080044010.1002/adma.200800440 ↗
42. 10.1021/nl101747z10.1021/nl101747z ↗
43. 10.1021/nl303901910.1021/nl3039019 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.12532610.1103/PhysRevB.72.125326 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.136369210.1063/1.1363692 ↗
46. 10.1021/nl303307510.1021/nl3033075 ↗