journal article·2015-07

Competing Photocurrent Mechanisms in Quasi‐Metallic Carbon Nanotube pn Devices

Moh. R. Amer, Shun‐Wen Chang, Stephen B. Cronin

Small· Volume 11· Issue 26
Publisher page

Abstract

Photodetectors based on quasi-metallic carbon nanotubes exhibit unique optoelectronic properties. Due to their small bandgap, photocurrent generation is possible at room temperature. The origin of this photocurrent is investigated to determine the underlying mechanism, which can be photothermoelectric effect or photovoltaic effect, depending on the bandgap magnitude of the quasi-metallic nanotube. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center of Excellence for Green Nanotechnologies University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology Riyadh Saudi Arabia

Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Southern California Los Angeles CA 90089 USA

Department of Electrical Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles CA 90089 USA

Department of Material Science University of Southern California Los Angeles CA 90089 USA

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl034313e10.1021/nl034313e ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2006.16910.1038/nnano.2006.169 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2009.31910.1038/nnano.2009.319 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl901680410.1021/nl9016804 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.10740110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.107401 ↗
6. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.18610.1038/nphoton.2010.186 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24010.1038/nphoton.2013.240 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.121138410.1126/science.1211384 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.117611210.1126/science.1176112 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.176959510.1063/1.1769595 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.243598010.1063/1.2435980 ↗
12. Aspitarte L. · Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. · 2014 · 59 · 216
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.25680110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.256801 ↗
14. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.31110.1038/nphoton.2013.311 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl402334e10.1021/nl402334e ↗
16. 10.1021/nl302321k10.1021/nl302321k ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.193210.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1932 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.105885310.1126/science.1058853 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.07340810.1103/PhysRevB.63.073408 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.116579910.1126/science.1165799 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R1130510.1103/PhysRevB.60.R11305 ↗
22. 10.1021/nl501267810.1021/nl5012678 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.26740310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.267403 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.spmi.2007.07.02610.1016/j.spmi.2007.07.026 ↗
25. 10.1021/nl903451y10.1021/nl903451y ↗
26. 10.1021/nl901042w10.1021/nl901042w ↗
27. Datta S. · 1997
28. 10.1109/LED.2009.202761510.1109/LED.2009.2027615 ↗
29. 10.1007/s12274-013-0351-510.1007/s12274-013-0351-5 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.22740110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.227401 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl071840f10.1021/nl071840f ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.10550110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.105501 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.15550510.1103/PhysRevLett.95.155505 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12274-012-0197-210.1007/s12274-012-0197-2 ↗