journal article·2015-10Open access

Conductive‐AFM Patterning of Organic Semiconductors

Benjamin P. Brown, Loren Picco, Mervyn J. Miles, Charl F. J. Faul

Small· Volume 11· Issue 38

Abstract

Using a conductive atomic force microscope (c-AFM) redox-writing technique, it is shown that it is possible to locally, and reversibly, pattern conducting, and nonconducting features on the surface of a low molecular weight aniline-based organic (semi)-conductor thin film using a commercial c-AFM. It is shown that application of a voltage between the tip and sample causes localized redox reactions at the surface without damage.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry University of Bristol Bristol BS8 1TS UK

Bristol Centre for Functional Nanomaterials Centre for Nanoscience and Quantum Information University of Bristol Tyndall Avenue Bristol BS8 1FD UK

School of Physics University of Bristol Bristol BS8 1TL UK

Centre for Nanoscience and Quantum Information University of Bristol Bristol BS8 1FD UK

Funding

Bristol Centre for Functional Nanomaterials · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0945010.1038/nature09450 ↗
2. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/6/06200110.1088/0957-4484/23/6/062001 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmeth87110.1038/nmeth871 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr500059w10.1021/cr500059w ↗
5. 10.1039/B501599P10.1039/B501599P ↗
6. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/24/24530110.1088/0957-4484/21/24/245301 ↗
7. 10.1021/ja101627e10.1021/ja101627e ↗
8. 10.1002/cphc.20130093710.1002/cphc.201300937 ↗
9. 10.1002/chem.20090043310.1002/chem.200900433 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20080202410.1002/adma.200802024 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20100198710.1002/adma.201001987 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2014.15710.1038/nnano.2014.157 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.02.04010.1016/j.ultramic.2010.02.040 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.337488510.1063/1.3374885 ↗
15. 10.1002/sia.131510.1002/sia.1315 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20050242110.1002/adma.200502421 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00227-810.1016/S0928-4931(02)00227-8 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20040053410.1002/adfm.200400534 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/9/09530210.1088/0957-4484/20/9/095302 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.06110.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.061 ↗
21. 10.1002/marc.20070074110.1002/marc.200700741 ↗
22. 10.1002/chem.20110169710.1002/chem.201101697 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20046092810.1002/anie.200460928 ↗
24. 10.1002/smll.20150051110.1002/smll.201500511 ↗
25. Current–voltage spectroscopy was carried out on as‐prepared and modified samples. No consistent repeatable data could be gathered possibly due to the low conductivity of the sample and the results proved inconclusive (see Figure S3 Supporting Information for example data).
26. 10.1063/1.36898610.1063/1.368986 ↗
27. 10.1021/cm001224j10.1021/cm001224j ↗
28. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/4/04403010.1088/0957-4484/18/4/044030 ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20120322310.1002/smll.201203223 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.01410.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.014 ↗
31. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/6/06550110.1088/0957-4484/26/6/065501 ↗
32. 10.1039/c2jm32278a10.1039/c2jm32278a ↗