journal article·2025-01Open access

Enhanced Electrostatic Dust Removal from Solar Panels Using Transparent Conductive Nano‐Textured Surfaces

Fabian J. Dickhardt, Sreedath Panat, Kripa K. Varanasi

Small· Volume 21· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Dust accumulation on solar panels is a mjor operational challenge faced by the photovoltaic industry. Removing dust using water‐based cleaning is expensive and unsustainable. Dust repulsion via charge induction is an efficient way to clean solar panels and recover power output without consuming any water. However, it is still challenging to remove particles of ≈30 µm and smaller because Van der Waals force of adhesion dominates electrostatic force of repulsion. Here, the study proposes nano‐textured, transparent, electrically conductive glass surfaces to significantly enhance electrostatic dust removal for particles smaller than ≈30 µm. We perform atomic force microscopy pull‐off force experiments and demonstrates that nano‐textured surfaces reduce the force of adhesion of silica micro‐particles by up to 2 orders of magnitude compared to un‐textured surfaces from 460 to 8.6 nN. We show that reduced adhesion on nano‐textured surfaces results in significantly better dust removal of small particles compared to non‐textured or micro‐textured surfaces, reducing the surface coverage from 35% to 10%. We fabricate transparent, electrically conductive, nano‐textured glass that can be retrofitted on solar panel surfaces using copper nano‐mask based scalable nano‐fabrication technique and shows that 90% of lost power output for particles smaller than ≈10 µm can be recovered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Near-Field Optical Microscopy

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology 127 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge MA 02142 USA

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.01910.1016/j.joule.2019.08.019 ↗
2. 10.1038/srep1583310.1038/srep15833 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41598-018-32291-810.1038/s41598-018-32291-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.04410.1016/j.rser.2016.01.044 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.06510.1016/j.rser.2010.07.065 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.06510.1016/j.rser.2012.12.065 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.01510.1016/j.rser.2018.09.015 ↗
8. 10.1109/PVSC.2013.674419410.1109/PVSC.2013.6744194 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41893-020-0553-210.1038/s41893-020-0553-2 ↗
10. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.253530810.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2535308 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.abm007810.1126/sciadv.abm0078 ↗
12. 10.3390/en912100610.3390/en9121006 ↗
13. 10.1080/0272635060114634110.1080/02726350601146341 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.elstat.2009.02.01210.1016/j.elstat.2009.02.012 ↗
15. C. I.Calle J. L.Mcfall C. R.Buhler S. J.Snyder E. E.Arens A.Chen M. L.Ritz J. S.Clements C. R.Fortier S.Trigwell In Proc. ESA Annual Meeting on Electrostatics 2008.
16. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.06.01010.1016/j.actaastro.2011.06.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.elstat.2014.10.01110.1016/j.elstat.2014.10.011 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.elstat.2019.02.00210.1016/j.elstat.2019.02.002 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0294610.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02946 ↗
20. 10.1109/TIA.2013.225839110.1109/TIA.2013.2258391 ↗
21. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.261708810.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2617088 ↗
22. Haus H. A. · 1989
23. 10.1109/TIA.2002.80722810.1109/TIA.2002.807228 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-710.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-7 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.332810.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3328 ↗
26. 10.1098/rspa.1971.014110.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
27. I.Nayshevsky Q.Xu A.Lyons In 2018 International PV Soiling Workshop2018 3 https://doi.org/10.17632/GT2H83SSB5.3.
28. Israelachvili J. · 2011
29. 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-110.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
30. 10.1017/CBO978051161460610.1017/CBO9780511614606 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0187410.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01874 ↗
32. R.Jones H. M.Pollock J. A. S.Cleaver C. S.Hodges 2002 18 8045.10.1021/la0259196 ↗
33. 10.1021/la052760z10.1021/la052760z ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.011 ↗
35. 10.1021/nn301112t10.1021/nn301112t ↗
36. 10.1006/jcis.2001.812610.1006/jcis.2001.8126 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.04010.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.040 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10080210.1016/j.surfin.2020.100802 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00170-021-06954-210.1007/s00170-021-06954-2 ↗
40. 10.1006/jcis.2000.716810.1006/jcis.2000.7168 ↗
41. 10.1080/02786826.2014.89883510.1080/02786826.2014.898835 ↗
42. 10.1002/adma.20070114010.1002/adma.200701140 ↗
43. 10.1117/3.252539310.1117/3.2525393 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.mssp.2011.02.01410.1016/j.mssp.2011.02.014 ↗
45. 10.1021/la201727t10.1021/la201727t ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.06.01310.1016/j.ultramic.2012.06.013 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.00310.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003 ↗
48. 10.1007/BF0135218210.1007/BF01352182 ↗
49. 10.3390/coatings303012610.3390/coatings3030126 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.04.04410.1016/j.spmi.2017.04.044 ↗
51. 10.1007/s00339-008-4674-010.1007/s00339-008-4674-0 ↗
52. 10.1007/s12274-013-0320-z10.1007/s12274-013-0320-z ↗
53. R. B.Husar Intercontinental Transport of Air Pollution Vol.4 2004 p.277.
54. D.Orange J. Y.Gac M. I.Diallo Tracers in Hydrology. Proceedings of Int. Symp Yokohama 1993 p.303.
55. 10.1007/s42835-021-00725-510.1007/s42835-021-00725-5 ↗