Photovoltaic Performance of Ultrasmall PbSe Quantum Dots
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigated the effect of PbSe quantum dot size on the performance of Schottky solar cells made in an ITO/PEDOT/PbSe/aluminum structure, varying the PbSe nanoparticle diameter from 1 to 3 nm. In this highly confined regime, we find that the larger particle bandgap can lead to higher open-circuit voltages (∼0.6 V), and thus an increase in overall efficiency compared to previously reported devices of this structure. To carry out this study, we modified existing synthesis methods to obtain ultrasmall PbSe nanocrystals with diameters as small as 1 nm, where the nanocrystal size is controlled by adjusting the growth temperature. As expected, we find that photocurrent decreases with size due to reduced absorption and increased recombination, but we also find that the open-circuit voltage begins to decrease for particles with diameters smaller than 2 nm, most likely due to reduced collection efficiency. Owing to this effect, we find peak performance for devices made with PbSe dots with a first exciton energy of ∼1.6 eV (2.3 nm diameter), with a typical efficiency of 3.5%, and a champion device efficiency of 4.57%. Comparing the external quantum efficiency of our devices to an optical model reveals that the photocurrent is also strongly affected by the coherent interference in the thin film due to Fabry-Pérot cavity modes within the PbSe layer. Our results demonstrate that even in this simple device architecture, fine-tuning of the nanoparticle size can lead to substantial improvements in efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Thomas J. Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Tang J. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 23 · 1210.1002/adma.201001491 ↗
2. Wise F. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2000 · 33 · 77310.1021/ar970220q ↗
3. Kang I. · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1997 · 14 · 163210.1364/JOSAB.14.001632 ↗
4. Murray C. B. · IBM J. Res. Dev. · 2001 · 45 · 4710.1147/rd.451.0047 ↗
5. Luther J. M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 348810.1021/nl802476m ↗
6. Johnston K. W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 15111510.1063/1.2912340 ↗
7. Sun B. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 123510.1021/nl9001469 ↗
8. Luther J. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 27110.1021/nn7003348 ↗
9. Tang J. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 86910.1021/nn901564q ↗
10. Pattantyus-Abraham A. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 337410.1021/nn100335g ↗
11. Luther J. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 370410.1002/adma.201001148 ↗
12. Zarghami M. H. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 247510.1021/nn100339b ↗
13. Ma W. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 169910.1021/nl900388a ↗
14. Choi J. J. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 374910.1021/nl901930g ↗
15. Nair G. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 214510.1021/nl200798x ↗
16. Hines M. A. · Adv. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 184410.1002/adma.200305395 ↗
17. Evans C. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 289610.1021/nl801685a ↗
18. Peng X. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 534310.1021/ja9805425 ↗
19. An alternative approach would be to separate the nucleation and growth phases by employing an intermediate species, as shown byKovalenkoet al.(20)to achieve PbSe quantum dots as small as 3.9 nm in diameter.
20. Kovalenko M. V. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 302910.1002/anie.200705604 ↗
21. Yu W. · Angew. Chem. · 2002 · 114 · 247410.1002/1521-3757(20020703)114:13<2474::AID-ANGE2474>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
22. Dai Q. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 151810.1021/nn9001616 ↗
23. Du H. · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 132110.1021/nl025785g ↗
24. Yu W. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 331810.1021/cm049476y ↗
25. Wehrenberg B. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 1063410.1021/jp021187e ↗
26. Lifshitz E. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 2535610.1021/jp0644356 ↗
27. Leitsmann R. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 350510.1021/nn900987j ↗
28. Warner J. H. · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 17510.1088/0957-4484/16/2/001 ↗
29. Acharya S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 459410.1021/ja711064b ↗
30. FernÈe M. J. · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 95610.1088/0957-4484/17/4/020 ↗
31. Efros A. L. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 30 · 47510.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.475 ↗
32. An J. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 212910.1021/nl071219f ↗
33. Liu Y. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 196010.1021/nl101284k ↗
34. Johnston K. W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 12211110.1063/1.2896295 ↗
35. Forouhi A. · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 701810.1103/PhysRevB.34.7018 ↗
36. Law M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 390410.1021/nl802353x ↗
37. Palik E. D. · Handbook of Optical Constants · 1984 · 1 · 1297
38. Rakic A. D. · Appl. Opt. · 1998 · 37 · 527110.1364/AO.37.005271 ↗
39. Beard M. C. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 301910.1021/nl101490z ↗
40. Nootz G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 15530210.1103/PhysRevB.83.155302 ↗