journal article·2014-01-28Open access

Switching Mechanism in Single-Layer Molybdenum Disulfide Transistors: An Insight into Current Flow across Schottky Barriers

Han Liu, Mengwei Si, Yexin Deng, Adam T. Neal, Yuchen Du, Sina Najmaei, Pulickel M. Ajayan, Jun Lou, Peide D. Ye

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

In this article, we study the properties of metal contacts to single-layer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) crystals, revealing the nature of switching mechanism in MoS2 transistors. On investigating transistor behavior as contact length changes, we find that the contact resistivity for metal/MoS2 junctions is defined by contact area instead of contact width. The minimum gate dependent transfer length is ∼0.63 μm in the on-state for metal (Ti) contacted single-layer MoS2. These results reveal that MoS2 transistors are Schottky barrier transistors, where the on/off states are switched by the tuning of the Schottky barriers at contacts. The effective barrier heights for source and drain barriers are primarily controlled by gate and drain biases, respectively. We discuss the drain induced barrier narrowing effect for short channel devices, which may reduce the influence of large contact resistance for MoS2 Schottky barrier transistors at the channel length scaling limit.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Mak K. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
2. Splendiani A. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 127110.1021/nl903868w ↗
3. Radisavljevic B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
4. Wang H. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 467410.1021/nl302015v ↗
5. Liu H. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 33 · 54610.1109/LED.2012.2184520 ↗
6. Liu H. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 856310.1021/nn303513c ↗
7. Yoon Y. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 376810.1021/nl2018178 ↗
8. Alam K. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2012 · 59 · 325010.1109/TED.2012.2218283 ↗
9. Liu H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 152215
10. Tung R. T. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 607810.1103/PhysRevLett.84.6078 ↗
11. Du Y. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2013 · 34 · 132810.1109/LED.2013.2277311 ↗
12. Das S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 10010.1021/nl303583v ↗
13. Najmaei S. · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 75410.1038/nmat3673 ↗
14. Liu H. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 264010.1021/nl400778q ↗
15. Schroder D. K. · 2007
16. Nagashio K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 14351410.1063/1.3491804 ↗
17. Berger H. H. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1972 · 119 · 50710.1149/1.2404240 ↗
18. Heinze S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 10680110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.106801 ↗
19. Guo J. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2004 · 51 · 17210.1109/TED.2003.821883 ↗
20. Taur Y. · 200910.1017/CBO9781139195065 ↗
21. Neal A. T · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 707710.1021/nn402377g ↗
22. Baugher B. W. H. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 421210.1021/nl401916s ↗