Enhancing Sensitivity of a Single ZnO Micro-/Nanowire Photodetector by Piezo-phototronic Effect
Source abstract
Abstract
We demonstrate the piezoelectric effect on the responsivity of a metal-semiconductor-metal ZnO micro-/nanowire photodetector. The responsivity of the photodetector is respectively enhanced by 530%, 190%, 9%, and 15% upon 4.1 pW, 120.0 pW, 4.1 nW, and 180.4 nW UV light illumination onto the wire by introducing a -0.36% compressive strain in the wire, which effectively tuned the Schottky barrier height at the contact by the produced local piezopotential. After a systematic study on the Schottky barrier height change with tuning of the strain and the excitation light intensity, an in-depth understanding is provided about the physical mechanism of the coupling of piezoelectric, optical, and semiconducting properties. Our results show that the piezo-phototronic effect can enhance the detection sensitivity more than 5-fold for pW levels of light detection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Material Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, Department of Optical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang Z. L. · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2009 · 64 · 3310.1016/j.mser.2009.02.001 ↗
2. Heo Y. W. · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2004 · 47 · 110.1016/j.mser.2004.09.001 ↗
3. Wang Z. L. · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2010
4. Goldberger J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 910.1021/jp0452599 ↗
5. Zimmler M. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 05110110.1063/1.2965797 ↗
6. Huang M. H. · Science · 2001 · 292 · 189710.1126/science.1060367 ↗
7. Yang Q. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 10110810.1063/1.3093821 ↗
8. Wan Q. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 365410.1063/1.1738932 ↗
9. Choi A. · Sens. Actuators, B · 2010 · 148 · 57710.1016/j.snb.2010.04.049 ↗
10. Bao J. M. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 171910.1021/nl061080t ↗
11. Willander M. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 33200110.1088/0957-4484/20/33/332001 ↗
12. Law M. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 45510.1038/nmat1387 ↗
13. Weintraub B. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 110.1002/anie.200904492 ↗
14. Soci C. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 100310.1021/nl070111x ↗
15. Aga R. S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 23210810.1063/1.2822896 ↗
16. Zhou J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 19110310.1063/1.3133358 ↗
17. Kim W. · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2009 · 206 · 17910.1002/pssa.200824338 ↗
18. Chen M. W. · Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 1483610.1364/OE.18.014836 ↗
19. Wang Z. L. · Science · 2006 · 312 · 24210.1126/science.1124005 ↗
20. Wang X. D. · Science · 2007 · 316 · 10210.1126/science.1139366 ↗
21. Cha S. N. · Adv. Mater. · 2010
22. Wang X. D. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 276810.1021/nl061802g ↗
23. Fei P. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 343510.1021/nl901606b ↗
24. Zhou J. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 397310.1021/nl802497e ↗
25. Yang Y. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 12520110.1088/0957-4484/20/12/125201 ↗
26. Eichenfield M. · Nature · 2009 · 462 · 7810.1038/nature08524 ↗
27. Hu Y. F. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 422010.1021/nn1010045 ↗
28. Gao P. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 100210.1039/B816791E ↗
29. Zhou J. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 303510.1021/nl802367t ↗
30. Wei T. Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 01350810.1063/1.3285178 ↗
31. Mehta R. R. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1973 · 44 · 32510.1063/1.1661881 ↗
32. Sze S. M. · 1981
33. Schwede J. W. · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 76210.1038/nmat2814 ↗
34. Ki-Woong Chung Z. W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1991 · 59 · 119110.1063/1.105499 ↗
35. Shan W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1988 · 53 · 97410.1063/1.100045 ↗
36. Pan Z. W. · Science · 2001 · 291 · 194710.1126/science.1058120 ↗