journal article·2022-01-12

Radially Aligned Porous Silk Fibroin Scaffolds as Functional Templates for Engineering Human Biomimetic Hepatic Lobules

Xiuli Wang, Chengchen Guo, Lina Guo, Mingqi Wang, Ming Liu, Yizhe Song, Hui Jiao, Xiaoqing Wei, Zinan Zhao, David L. Kaplan

Publisher page

Abstract

Bioengineering functional hepatic tissue constructs that physiologically replicate the human native liver tissue in vitro is sought for clinical research and drug discovery. However, the intricate architecture and specific biofunctionality possessed by the native liver tissue remain challenging to mimic in vitro. In the present study, a versatile strategy to fabricate lobular-like silk protein scaffolds with radially aligned lamellar sheets, interconnected channels, and a converging central cavity was designed and implemented. A proof-of-concept study to bioengineer biomimetic hepatic lobules was conducted through coculturing human hepatocytes and primary endothelial cells on these lobular-like scaffolds. Relatively long-term viability of hepatocyte/endothelial cells was found along with cell alignment and organization in vitro. The hepatocytes showed special epithelial polarity and bile duct formation, similar to the liver plate, while the aligned endothelial cells generated endothelial networks, similar to natural hepatic sinuses. This endowed the three-dimensional (3D) tissue constructs with the capability to recapitulate hepatic-like parenchymal–mesenchymal growth patterns in vitro. More importantly, the cocultured hepatocytes outperformed monocultures or monolayer cultures, displaying significantly enhanced hepatocyte functions, including functional gene expression, albumin (ALB) secretion, urea synthesis, and metabolic activity. Thus, this functional unit with a biomimetic phenotype provides a novel technology for bioengineering biomimetic hepatic lobules in vitro, with potential utility as a building block for bioartificial liver (BAL) engineering or as a robust tool for drug metabolism investigation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Histology & Embryology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Liaoning 116044, China

Biomedical Engineering Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States

School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.01210.1016/j.taap.2013.01.012 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.106866010.1126/science.1068660 ↗
3. Gijbels E. · Methods Mol. Biol. · 2019 · 1981 · 32510.1007/978-1-4939-9420-5_21 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.05310.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.053 ↗
5. 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.066710.1089/ten.tea.2013.0667 ↗
6. 10.1080/15476278.2018.142393110.1080/15476278.2018.1423931 ↗
7. Mescher A. L. · 2016
8. 10.1002/hep.51029014910.1002/hep.510290149 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tox.2005.10.01710.1016/j.tox.2005.10.017 ↗
10. 10.1038/nrm185810.1038/nrm1858 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat244110.1038/nmat2441 ↗
12. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/01410110.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014101 ↗
13. 10.1038/nprot.2015.12810.1038/nprot.2015.128 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.02010.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.020 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.5b1211410.1021/acsami.5b12114 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7SM01631J10.1039/C7SM01631J ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11972010.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119720 ↗
18. 10.1038/nprot.2011.37910.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.11810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.118 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.044 ↗
21. 10.1039/b811392k10.1039/b811392k ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat255810.1038/nmat2558 ↗
23. 10.1073/pnas.171591211510.1073/pnas.1715912115 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja049642310.1021/ja0496423 ↗
25. 10.1038/nmat148710.1038/nmat1487 ↗
26. 10.1002/mabi.20120023010.1002/mabi.201200230 ↗
27. 10.1088/1758-5090/aaf3c910.1088/1758-5090/aaf3c9 ↗
28. 10.1002/smll.20190550510.1002/smll.201905505 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20210262410.1002/adma.202102624 ↗
30. 10.1089/ten.tec.2018.013410.1089/ten.tec.2018.0134 ↗
31. Cohen M. · Methods Mol Biol. · 2015 · 1250 · 16110.1007/978-1-4939-2074-7_11 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.04710.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.047 ↗
33. 10.1002/hep.2762110.1002/hep.27621 ↗
34. 10.1038/nature1227110.1038/nature12271 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.06.01010.1016/j.stemcr.2017.06.010 ↗
36. 10.1002/jat.373710.1002/jat.3737 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.11.00710.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.11.007 ↗
38. 10.1242/dev.14279410.1242/dev.142794 ↗
39. 10.1002/hep.2410810.1002/hep.24108 ↗