journal article·2011-09-27

Engineering the Unique 2D Mat of Graphene to Achieve Graphene-TiO2 Nanocomposite for Photocatalytic Selective Transformation: What Advantage does Graphene Have over Its Forebear Carbon Nanotube?

Yanhui Zhang, Zi-Rong Tang, Xianzhi Fu, Yi-Jun Xu

ACS Nano· Volume 5· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Increasing interest has been devoted to synthesizing graphene (GR)-semiconductor nanocomposites as photocatalysts for potential applications, which is very similar to its forebear carbon nanotube (CNT)-semiconductor photocatalysts. Unfortunately, a thoughtful and inevitable comparison between GR- and CNT-semiconductors as photocatalysts is often neglected in literature. This situation may give incomplete or exaggerated information on the contribution role of GR to enhance the semiconductor photocatalytic activity, as compared to CNT. Thus, our knowledge regarding the specific advantage of GR over CNT on how to design more efficient GR-semiconductor nanocomposites and understanding the origin of their enhanced photocatalytic performance is far from satisfactory. By taking the TiO(2) semiconductor as an example, we conceptually demonstrate how to synthesize a more efficient GR-TiO(2) nanocomposite as a visible light photocatalyst toward selective oxidation of alcohols under mild conditions. Comparison between GR-TiO(2) and CNT-TiO(2) discloses the prominent advantage of GR over CNT on both controlling the morphology of GR-TiO(2) nanocomposite and enhancing the photocatalytic activity of TiO(2). This work clearly highlights the importance and necessity for a comparison investigation between GR- and CNT-semiconductors as photocatalysts, which will promote our in-depth fundamental understanding on the analogy and difference between GR and CNT on controlling the morphology of GR (or CNT)-semiconductor nanocomposites and enhancing the photocatalytic performance. Therefore, we appeal the photocatalysis community to pay attention to this respect rather than separately imposing hype on the miracle of GR in much the same way as its carbon forebears, which could significantly advance our rational fabrication of smart GR-semiconductor nanocomposites for artificial photosynthesis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, People's Republic of China,

State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Photocatalysis and College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, People's Republic of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Geim A. K. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 153010.1126/science.1158877 ↗
2. Allen M. J. · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 13210.1021/cr900070d ↗
3. Rao C. N. R. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 775210.1002/anie.200901678 ↗
4. Guo S. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2011 · 40 · 264410.1039/c0cs00079e ↗
5. Bai H. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 108910.1002/adma.201003753 ↗
6. Kamat P. V. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 52010.1021/jz900265j ↗
7. Stankovich S. · Nature · 2006 · 442 · 28210.1038/nature04969 ↗
8. Li X. L. · Science · 2008 · 319 · 122910.1126/science.1150878 ↗
9. Compton O. C. · Small · 2010 · 6 · 71110.1002/smll.200901934 ↗
10. Wang X. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 32310.1021/nl072838r ↗
11. Geim A. K. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 18310.1038/nmat1849 ↗
12. Zhang Y. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 730310.1021/nn1024219 ↗
13. Zhang H. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 38010.1021/nn901221k ↗
14. Akhavan O. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 2021410.1021/jp906325q ↗
15. Zhang X. Y. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 280110.1039/b917240h ↗
16. Chen C. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 642510.1021/nn102130m ↗
17. Zhou K. · New J. Chem. · 2011 · 35 · 35310.1039/C0NJ00623H ↗
18. Zhang Y. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 46 · 262210.1007/s10853-010-5116-x ↗
19. Fan W. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1069410.1021/jp2008804 ↗
20. Guo J. · Ultrason. Sonochem. · 2011 · 18 · 108210.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.03.021 ↗
21. Xu T. · Appl. Catal., B · 2011 · 101 · 38210.1016/j.apcatb.2010.10.007 ↗
22. Xu Y. J. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 266910.1021/jp909855p ↗
23. Woan K. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 223310.1002/adma.200802738 ↗
24. Leary R. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 74110.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.010 ↗
25. Yu Y. · Appl. Catal., A · 2005 · 289 · 18610.1016/j.apcata.2005.04.057 ↗
26. Wang W. · Appl. Catal., B · 2005 · 56 · 30510.1016/j.apcatb.2004.09.018 ↗
27. Yao Y. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 495210.1021/es800191n ↗
28. Enache D. I. · Science · 2006 · 311 · 36210.1126/science.1120560 ↗
29. Zhang M. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 973010.1002/anie.200803630 ↗
30. Hudlicky M. · 1990
31. Nature · 2011 · 473 · 419
32. Noorden R. V. · Nature · 2011 · 469 · 1410.1038/469014a ↗
33. Fujishima A. · Surf. Sci. Rep · 2008 · 63 · 51510.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001 ↗
34. Xu H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1382910.1021/jp061934y ↗
35. Mao Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 821710.1021/ja0607483 ↗
36. Bi Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 649010.1021/ja2002132 ↗
37. Loh K. P. · Nat. Chem. · 2010 · 2 · 101510.1038/nchem.907 ↗
38. Jahan M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1448710.1021/ja105089w ↗
39. Zhang N. · J. Mat. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 815210.1039/c1jm10100e ↗
40. Liang Y. T. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 286510.1021/nl2012906 ↗
41. Akhavan O. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 417410.1021/nn1007429 ↗
42. Akhavan O. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1295510.1021/jp103472c ↗
43. Hummers W. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1958 · 80 · 133910.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
44. Kovtyukhova N. I. · Chem. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 77110.1021/cm981085u ↗
45. Pan D. Y. · Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 313610.1021/cm900395k ↗
46. Cote L. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 104310.1021/ja806262m ↗