Depleted-Heterojunction Colloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Colloidal quantum dot (CQD) photovoltaics combine low-cost solution processability with quantum size-effect tunability to match absorption with the solar spectrum. Rapid recent advances in CQD photovoltaics have led to impressive 3.6% AM1.5 solar power conversion efficiencies. Two distinct device architectures and operating mechanisms have been advanced. The first-the Schottky device-was optimized and explained in terms of a depletion region driving electron-hole pair separation on the semiconductor side of a junction between an opaque low-work-function metal and a p-type CQD film. The second-the excitonic device-employed a CQD layer atop a transparent conductive oxide (TCO) and was explained in terms of diffusive exciton transport via energy transfer followed by exciton separation at the type-II heterointerface between the CQD film and the TCO. Here we fabricate CQD photovoltaic devices on TCOs and show that our devices rely on the establishment of a depletion region for field-driven charge transport and separation, and that they also exploit the large bandgap of the TCO to improve rectification and block undesired hole extraction. The resultant depleted-heterojunction solar cells provide a 5.1% AM1.5 power conversion efficiency. The devices employ infrared-bandgap size-effect-tuned PbS CQDs, enabling broadband harvesting of the solar spectrum. We report the highest open-circuit voltages observed in solid-state CQD solar cells to date, as well as fill factors approaching 60%, through the combination of efficient hole blocking (heterojunction) and very small minority carrier density (depletion) in the large-bandgap moiety.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King’s College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada
ICFO—Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, Mediterranean Technology Park, 08860 Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain
Laboratory for Photonics and Interfaces, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Raugei, M.; Frankl, P.InSustainable Energy Production and Consumption; 2008; pp293−304.10.1007/978-1-4020-8494-2_20 ↗
2. Adachi, S.InHandbook on physical properties of semiconductors;Springer, 2004; Vol.1, p93.
3. Luque, A.; Hegedus, S.InHandbook of photovoltaic science and engineering;John Wiley and Sons, 2003; p193.10.1002/0470014008 ↗
4. Yu G. · Science · 1995 · 270 · 178910.1126/science.270.5243.1789 ↗
5. Günes S. · Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 132410.1021/cr050149z ↗
6. Sargent E. H. · Nat. Photon. · 2009 · 3 · 32510.1038/nphoton.2009.89 ↗
7. Hillhouse H. W. · Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2009 · 14 · 24510.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.002 ↗
8. Wadia C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 207210.1021/es8019534 ↗
9. Luther J. M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 348810.1021/nl802476m ↗
10. Ma W. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 169910.1021/nl900388a ↗
11. Choi J. J · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 374910.1021/nl901930g ↗
12. Leschkies K. S. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 363810.1021/nn901139d ↗
13. Johnston K. W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 15111510.1063/1.2912340 ↗
14. Klem E. J. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 18311310.1063/1.2735674 ↗
15. Koleilat G. I. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 83310.1021/nn800093v ↗
16. Debnath R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 595210.1021/ja1013695 ↗
17. Fan S. · Electrochem. Commun. · 2009 · 11 · 133710.1016/j.elecom.2009.04.037 ↗
18. Lee H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 273510.1002/adfm.200900081 ↗
19. Giménez S. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 29520410.1088/0957-4484/20/29/295204 ↗
20. Clifford J. P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 25311710.1063/1.2823582 ↗
21. Ashcroft N. W. · 1976
22. Mönch, W.InSemiconductor surfaces and interfaces;Springer, 2001; p572.10.1007/978-3-662-04459-9 ↗
23. Hyun B. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 220610.1021/nn800336b ↗
24. Dissanayake D. M. N. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 043501-3
25. Scharber M. C. · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 78910.1002/adma.200501717 ↗
26. Coakley K. M. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 453310.1021/cm049654n ↗
27. Law M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 390410.1021/nl802353x ↗
28. Schottky W. · Z. Phys. · 1942 · 118 · 53910.1007/BF01329843 ↗
29. Kavan L. · Electrochim. Acta · 1995 · 40 · 64310.1016/0013-4686(95)90400-W ↗
30. O’Regan B. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1990 · 94 · 872010.1021/j100387a017 ↗
31. Nakade S. · Electrochem. Commun. · 2003 · 5 · 80410.1016/j.elecom.2003.07.008 ↗
32. Zaban A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1997 · 101 · 798510.1021/jp971857u ↗
33. Shindo H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1965 · 87 · 190410.1021/ja01087a013 ↗
34. Clark S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 730210.1021/jp0713561 ↗
35. Warner J. H. · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 17510.1088/0957-4484/16/2/001 ↗
36. Choi J. J. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 180510.1021/nl100498e ↗
37. Hines M. · Adv. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 184410.1002/adma.200305395 ↗