InGaZnO4 and In2O3 Mobility Trend: The Role of Structural Disorder from Amorphous to Crystalline States
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the mobility trends of indium–gallium–zinc oxide (IGZO) thin-film transistors over a wide range of fabrication conditions, from amorphous to crystalline phases. By utilizing machine learning potential (MLP) to generate 70 distinct IGZO structures, we analyze electron mobility while taking into account structural disorder and electron scattering mechanisms. Our findings reveal that mobility peaks at the transition from amorphous to nanocrystalline phases, and then, as more ordered, crystalline structures emerge, the mobility decreases sharply due to the distortion of polyhedron of indium–oxygen in well-ordered regions. These results offer critical insights into optimizing the fabrication conditions for high-performance IGZO devices by identifying the ideal structural phase for achieving maximum mobility.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Electrical and Thermal Properties of Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Semiconductor Materials and Devices Engineering
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
Advanced Device Research Lab, Semiconductor R&D Center
Samsung Electronics
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Purdue University
Funding
Samsung · Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology · National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy · Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Kimizuka N. · 201610.1002/9781119247289 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0109110.1021/acsaelm.0c01091 ↗
3. 10.1143/JJAP.48.08160710.1143/JJAP.48.081607 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm502689x10.1021/cm502689x ↗
5. 10.7567/JJAP.55.03550410.7567/JJAP.55.035504 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.11125210.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111252 ↗
7. 10.3938/jkps.58.49210.3938/jkps.58.492 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.24510.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.245 ↗
9. 10.35848/1347-4065/abf6e610.35848/1347-4065/abf6e6 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-510.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
11. Geiger, M.; Smidt, T. E3nn: Euclidean Neural Networks. arXiv, 2207.09453, 2022.
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.22410410.1103/PhysRevB.102.224104 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.480209310.1063/1.4802093 ↗
14. Lundstrom M. · 200010.1017/CBO9780511618611 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7TC00193B10.1039/C7TC00193B ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.10.10510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.10.105 ↗
17. 10.1038/asiamat.2010.510.1038/asiamat.2010.5 ↗
18. Bader R. F. W. · 199010.1093/oso/9780198551683.001.0001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.496855010.1063/1.4968550 ↗
21. 10.1088/1361-648X/ab400710.1088/1361-648X/ab4007 ↗