Suppressing Thermal Tail by Dirac States and High Density of States in Two-Dimensional Ag2S toward Low-Power Electronics
Source abstract
Abstract
To further reduce power dissipation, suppressing the subthreshold swing ( SS ) to overcome the physical limit of 60 mV dec –1 is demanded in metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). Here, we theoretically propose that the unique Dirac point and the strong density of state peak of monolayer Ag 2 S can sufficiently suppress the thermal tail of injected electrons for a steep-slope MOSFET. The 12 nm-gate-length n-type Ag 2 S MOSFET brings the SS down to 30 mV dec –1 with a high on-state current of 2258 μA μm –1, fulfilling the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems requirements for 2028 both in high-performance and low-power applications. Additionally, the sub-10 nm n-type Ag 2 S MOSFETs are also evaluated by the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors for high-performance devices and satisfy the requests until the gate length scales down to 5 nm. Our results suggest that monolayer Ag 2 S is a promising channel alternative for steep-slope transistors in next-generation electronics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Material Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Institute of Microelectronics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Funding
Major Research Plan · Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province · Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1067910.1038/nature10679 ↗
2. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS), 2021 edition. https://irds.ieee.org/editions/2021 (accessed 2021).
3. 10.1038/nnano.2014.20710.1038/nnano.2014.207 ↗
4. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.5210.1038/natrevmats.2016.52 ↗
5. 10.1038/d41586-019-00793-810.1038/d41586-019-00793-8 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms1258510.1038/ncomms12585 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0848910.1021/acsnano.9b08489 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.04406610.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044066 ↗
9. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms547510.1038/ncomms5475 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0353110.1021/acsnano.7b03531 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2017.4310.1038/nnano.2017.43 ↗
13. Wang, Q.; Sang, P.; Ma, X.; Wang, F.; Wei, W.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, J. Cold Source Engineering towards Sub-60mV/dec P-type Field-effect-transistors (pFETs): Materials, Structures, and Doping Optimizations. In2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 12–18, 2020; IEEE, 2020; pp 22.4.1–22.4.4.10.1109/IEDM13553.2020.9371895 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-019-13797-910.1038/s41467-019-13797-9 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aap919510.1126/science.aap9195 ↗
16. 10.1109/TED.2018.283638710.1109/TED.2018.2836387 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20190600010.1002/adma.201906000 ↗
18. Liu, F.; Qiu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, L. M.; Wang, J.; Wu, Z.; Guo, H. First Principles Simulation of Energy Efficient Switching by Source Density of States Engineering. In2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 1–5, 2018; IEEE, 2018; pp 33.2.1–33.2.4.10.1109/IEDM.2018.8614597 ↗
19. 10.1109/TED.2022.316912210.1109/TED.2022.3169122 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0476110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04761 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0184410.1021/acsaem.0c01844 ↗
22. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), 2013 edition. https://www.semiconductors.org/resources/2013-international-technology-roadmap-for-semiconductors-itrs/ (accessed 2014-04).
23. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.02402210.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.024022 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.06401010.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.064010 ↗
25. 10.1109/LED.2020.304165710.1109/LED.2020.3041657 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.07541310.1103/PhysRevB.105.075413 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.05680210.1103/PhysRevLett.121.056802 ↗
28. 10.1002/inf2.1216810.1002/inf2.12168 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.8b0642710.1021/acsami.8b06427 ↗
30. 10.1002/aelm.20180072010.1002/aelm.201800720 ↗
31. 10.1002/aelm.20160019110.1002/aelm.201600191 ↗
32. 10.1109/TED.2021.313083410.1109/TED.2021.3130834 ↗
33. 10.1109/TED.2021.313084010.1109/TED.2021.3130840 ↗
34. 10.1002/aelm.20220038810.1002/aelm.202200388 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.05404710.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.054047 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41586-021-03472-910.1038/s41586-021-03472-9 ↗
37. 10.1088/1361-6463/acc53f10.1088/1361-6463/acc53f ↗
38. 10.1109/TED.2023.324156910.1109/TED.2023.3241569 ↗
39. Gandus, G.; Cao, J.; Agarwal, T.; Luisier, M.; Lee, Y. Ab Initio Quantum Transport Simulations of Defective Devices Based on 2-D Materials via a Projected-GW Approach. In2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 3–7, 2022; IEEE, 2022; pp 28.3.1–28.3.4.10.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019510 ↗
40. 10.1109/TED.2016.258343410.1109/TED.2016.2583434 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20200705110.1002/adma.202007051 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41928-019-0256-810.1038/s41928-019-0256-8 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41586-023-05819-w10.1038/s41586-023-05819-w ↗
44. 10.1126/science.aah469810.1126/science.aah4698 ↗