journal article·2020-10-05Open access

Edge States Drive Exciton Dissociation in Ruddlesden–Popper Lead Halide Perovskite Thin Films

Eli D. Kinigstein, Hsinhan Tsai, Wanyi Nie, Jean-Christophe Blancon, Kevin G. Yager, Kannatassen Appavoo, Jacky Even, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, Aditya D. Mohite, Matthew Y. Sfeir

ACS Materials Letters· Volume 2· Issue 10

Abstract

Efficient photovoltaic cells based on thin films of solution-processed 2D Ruddlesden–Popper hybrid perovskites (RPPs) represent an exciting breakthrough due to their enhanced tunability and chemical stability relative to those fabricated from 3D phases. However, reports of efficient charge separation and current collection are in apparent contradiction with the well-known enhancement of the exciton binding energy in multilayered halide perovskites, which should lower the device’s internal quantum efficiency and voltage. This controversy has led to various proposals for the electronic and physical structure of RPP thin films, including phase inhomogeneity as the driving force for exciton dissociation and transport. We address this apparent paradox in high-quality hot-cast RPP films by correlating ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy with X-ray scattering measurements. We show that a hot-casting fabrication method produces highly phase pure n = 3 (BA)2(MA)n−1PbnI3n+1 RPP structures. The high-phase purity and large grain sizes allow us to observe vertical transport of excitons via a diffusive process and allow us to determine that charge separation is primarily driven by dissociation at surface localized subgap electronic states. We analyze the differential absorption kinetics in films of varying thickness to directly determine that the excitonic diffusion constant is ∼0.18 cm2 s–1. We propose that a surface localized structural distortion, observed using surface selective grazing incidence X-ray scattering measurements, is responsible for the creation of the surface localized defect states. We find that the density and spatial distribution of these defect states is a function of preparation conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Columbia University, New York, New York 10025, United States

Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States

Materials Physics and Application Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States

Department of Physics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States

Univ Rennes, INSA Rennes, CNRS, Institut FOTON − UMR 6082, F-35000 Rennes, France

Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States

Photonics Initiative, Advanced Science Research Center, City University of New York, New York, New York 10031, United States

Department of Physics, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York 10016, United States

Funding

Columbia University · Institut Universitaire de France

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jz402016210.1021/jz4020162 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0042010.1021/acs.accounts.5b00420 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature1830610.1038/nature18306 ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20140646610.1002/anie.201406466 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20170421710.1002/adma.201704217 ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20170061110.1002/smll.201700611 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.7b1255110.1021/jacs.7b12551 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0004710.1021/acsenergylett.8b00047 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0084710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00847 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aal421110.1126/science.aal4211 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.5b0379610.1021/jacs.5b03796 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-018-04659-x10.1038/s41467-018-04659-x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.stam.2003.09.01910.1016/j.stam.2003.09.019 ↗
14. 10.1002/solr.20170006210.1002/solr.201700062 ↗
15. 10.1038/nnano.2016.11010.1038/nnano.2016.110 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.6b1258110.1021/jacs.6b12581 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0199910.1021/acsnano.8b01999 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0329410.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03294 ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.8b0460410.1021/jacs.8b04604 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-018-04430-210.1038/s41467-018-04430-2 ↗
21. 10.1126/sciadv.aau324110.1126/sciadv.aau3241 ↗
22. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.17110.1038/nphoton.2014.171 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms942010.1038/ncomms9420 ↗
24. 10.1021/nl403514x10.1021/nl403514x ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0763110.1021/acsnano.8b07631 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-019-13944-210.1038/s41467-019-13944-2 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41928-018-0101-510.1038/s41928-018-0101-5 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0020110.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00201 ↗
29. 10.1107/S002188981204788710.1107/S0021889812047887 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.7b1115710.1021/jacs.7b11157 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0311410.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03114 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.19530810.1103/PhysRevB.96.195308 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2014.04.03910.1016/j.jlumin.2014.04.039 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.514710.1103/PhysRevB.42.5147 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0207810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02078 ↗
36. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.21310.1038/nphoton.2015.213 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20180071010.1002/adma.201800710 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41563-018-0164-810.1038/s41563-018-0164-8 ↗