journal article·2025-06-02Open access

CHIPS-FF: Evaluating Universal Machine Learning Force Fields for Material Properties

Daniel Wines, Kamal Choudhary

ACS Materials Letters· Volume 7· Issue 6

Abstract

We introduce CHIPS-FF (Computational High-Performance Infrastructure for Predictive Simulation-based Force Fields), an open-source benchmarking platform for machine learning force fields (MLFFs). This platform focuses on complex properties including elastic constants, phonon spectra, defect formation energies, surface energies, and interfacial and amorphous phase properties. Utilizing 16 graph-based MLFFs including ALIGNN-FF, CHGNet, MatGL, MACE, SevenNet, ORB, MatterSim, and OMat24, CHIPS-FF integrates the Atomic Simulation Environment (ASE) with JARVIS-Tools to facilitate high-throughput simulations. Our framework is tested on a set of 104 materials, including metals, semiconductors, and insulators representative of those used in semiconductor components, with each MLFF evaluated for convergence, accuracy, and computational cost. Additionally, we evaluate the force-prediction accuracy of these models for close to 2 million atomic structures. By offering a streamlined, flexible benchmarking infrastructure, CHIPS-FF aims to guide the development and deployment of MLFFs for real-world semiconductor applications, bridging the gap between quantum mechanical simulations and large-scale device modeling.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Material Measurement Laboratory

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Funding

National Institute of Standards and Technology

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Tadmor E. B. · 201110.1017/CBO9781139003582 ↗
2. Xia W. · 2022
3. Martin R. M. · 202010.1017/9781108555586 ↗
5. Vasileska D. · 201710.1201/b13776 ↗
6. Butler K. T. · 2021
7. 10.1088/2632-2153/ad95db10.1088/2632-2153/ad95db ↗
8. 10.1038/s41524-019-0221-010.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41524-022-00734-610.1038/s41524-022-00734-6 ↗
10. Han, X.Q.; Wang, X.D.; Xu, M.Y.; Feng, Z.; Yao, B.W.; Guo, P.J.; Gao, Z.F.; Lu, Z.Y. AI-driven inverse design of materials: Past, present and future. Submitted November 2024. arXiv:2411.09429. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09429 (accessed 2025–04–24).
11. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0112610.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01126 ↗
12. 10.1039/D3DD00113J10.1039/D3DD00113J ↗
13. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
14. 10.1063/5.015929910.1063/5.0159299 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41524-020-00440-110.1038/s41524-020-00440-1 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
17. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20221078810.1002/adma.202210788 ↗
19. 10.1088/2053-1583/accc4310.1088/2053-1583/accc43 ↗
20. 10.1126/sciadv.abi794810.1126/sciadv.abi7948 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2024.10156010.1016/j.mtphys.2024.101560 ↗
22. Riebesell, J.; Goodall, R. E. A.; Benner, P.; Chiang, Y.; Deng, B.; Lee, A. A.; Jain, A.; Persson, K. A. Matbench Discovery – A framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions. Submitted August 2023. arXiv:2308.14920. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14920 (accessed 2024–04–15).
23. 10.1038/s41524-024-01259-w10.1038/s41524-024-01259-w ↗
24. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). JARVIS Leaderboard: Benchmarking Models for Materials Science. https://pages.nist.gov/jarvis_leaderboard/, 2024; (accessed 2024–10–02).
25. 10.1002/mgea.5810.1002/mgea.58 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41524-024-01500-610.1038/s41524-024-01500-6 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.4c0381510.1021/acsami.4c03815 ↗
28. Pota, B.; Ahlawat, P.; Csanyi, G.; Simoncelli, M. Thermal Conductivity Predictions with Foundation Atomistic Models. Submitted August 2024. arXiv:2408.00755. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00755 (accessed 2024–09–20).
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2025.12074710.1016/j.actamat.2025.120747 ↗
30. Loew, A.; Sun, D.; Wang, H.C.; Botti, S.; Marques, M. A. L. Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials are Ready for Phonons. Submitted December 2024. arXiv:2412.16551. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16551 (accessed 2024–12–24).
31. Materials Virtual Lab. MatGL: Graph Learning for Materials Science. https://github.com/materialsvirtuallab/matgl, 2024; (accessed 2024–10–02).
32. 10.1038/s43588-022-00349-310.1038/s43588-022-00349-3 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41524-024-01227-410.1038/s41524-024-01227-4 ↗
34. 10.1039/D2DD00096B10.1039/D2DD00096B ↗
35. 10.1038/s42256-023-00716-310.1038/s42256-023-00716-3 ↗
36. Batatia I. · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · 2022
37. Batatia, I.; Batzner, S.; Kovács, D. P.; Musaelian, A.; Simm, G. N. C.; Drautz, R.; Ortner, C.; Kozinsky, B.; Csányi, G. The Design Space of E(3)-Equivariant Atom-Centered Interatomic Potentials. Submitted May 2022. arXiv:2205.06643. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.06643.
38. Batatia, I. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry. Submitted December 2023. arXiv:2401.00096. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00096 (accessed 2024–03–20).
39. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0019010.1021/acs.jctc.4c00190 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-510.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
41. Neumann, M.; Gin, J.; Rhodes, B.; Bennett, S.; Li, Z.; Choubisa, H.; Hussey, A.; Godwin, J. Orb: AFast, Scalable Neural Network Potential. Submitted October 2024. arXiv:2410.22570. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22570 (accessed 2024–11–01).
42. Yang, H. MatterSim: A Deep Learning Atomistic Model Across Elements, Temperatures and Pressures. Submitted May 2024. arXiv:2405.04967. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04967 (accessed 2024–12–10).
43. Barroso-Luque, L.; Shuaibi, M.; Fu, X.; Wood, B. M.; Dzamba, M.; Gao, M.; Rizvi, A.; Zitnick, C. L.; Ulissi, Z. W. Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Models. Submitted October 2024. arXiv:2410.12771. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12771 (accessed 2024–11–01).
44. Liao, Y.L.; Wood, B.; Das, A.; Smidt, T. EquiformerV2: Improved Equivariant Transformer for Scaling to Higher-Degree Representations. Submitted June 2023. arXiv:2306.12059. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12059 (accessed 2024–11–01).
45. 10.1063/5.013538210.1063/5.0135382 ↗
46. 10.1039/D4DD00031E10.1039/D4DD00031E ↗
47. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/2/02220110.1088/0953-8984/22/2/022201 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
49. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.09430610.1103/PhysRevB.91.094306 ↗
51. 10.1088/1361-648X/acd83110.1088/1361-648X/acd831 ↗
52. Iwase, S. Benchmark surface energies with PFP. Published February 20, 2025. Preferred Networks Research & Development Blog. https://tech.preferred.jp/en/blog/benchmark-surface-energies-with-pfp/ (accessed 2025–02–28).
53. Project, U. N. I. Interface.csv dataset. https://github.com/usnistgov/intermat/blob/temp/intermat/Interface.csv, 2023; (accessed 2024–10–23).
54. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b0872310.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 ↗