journal article·2017-04-14Open access

Nanostructured Bulk-Heterojunction Solar Cells Based on Amorphous Carbon

Francesca Risplendi, Giancarlo Cicero, Jeffrey C. Grossman

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 2· Issue 4

Abstract

Amorphous carbon (a-C) has the potential to provide properties important to solar photovoltaics that are comparable to those of silicon-based materials with further advantages such as low cost, solution processing, air stability, and higher thermal resistance. We employ accurate computational approaches to explore and understand active layers based on bulk heterojunctions containing a-C. Our results show that interfaces with a-C and other carbon nanostructures could enable successful electron and hole extraction as well as reduced sources for carrier recombination. Ab initio molecular dynamics and density functional theory calculations are carried out for a large statistical set of interfaces between a-C structures of different densities and either carbon nanotubes or fullerenes. We show that the energy alignment at such interfaces can be widely tuned as a function of a-C density, doping chemistry, or nanostructure size to obtain type-II heterostructures and that the optical properties of such interfaces would be highly favorable for sunlight harvesting.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Funding

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.489149810.1063/1.4891498 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20120208810.1002/adma.201202088 ↗
3. 10.1021/nn302893p10.1021/nn302893p ↗
4. 10.1021/ja110373410.1021/ja1103734 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.04.00610.1016/j.solmat.2009.04.006 ↗
6. 10.1080/0001873860010191110.1080/00018738600101911 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl103134310.1021/nl1031343 ↗
8. 10.1039/c3ee41731j10.1039/c3ee41731j ↗
9. 10.1021/nn406256y10.1021/nn406256y ↗
10. 10.1021/nl502745210.1021/nl5027452 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.139210.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1392 ↗
12. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,92nd ed.Haynes, W. M., Ed.CRC Press, 2011; 4.121–4.123.
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.159410.1103/PhysRevB.53.1594 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.2287.210.1103/PhysRevB.49.2287.2 ↗
19. 10.1016/0038-1098(96)00538-810.1016/0038-1098(96)00538-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.00910.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.009 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.04010.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.040 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.218700610.1063/1.2187006 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.240386610.1063/1.2403866 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1108910.1103/PhysRevB.62.11089 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.477710.1103/PhysRevB.48.4777 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.823910.1103/PhysRevB.45.8239 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.148177110.1063/1.1481771 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp408414f10.1021/jp408414f ↗
30. 10.1126/science.124316710.1126/science.1243167 ↗
31. 10.1002/pip.467003030310.1002/pip.4670030303 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.19512110.1103/PhysRevB.83.195121 ↗
33. Fermi energy difference is evaluated for bulk samples with the same supercell.
34. 10.1166/jctn.2010.150710.1166/jctn.2010.1507 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.604510.1103/PhysRevB.60.6045 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00005-010.1016/S0927-796X(02)00005-0 ↗