Consequences of Annealing on Metal–Insulator–Semiconductor Water Splitting Photoelectrocatalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS) systems, combining light-harvesting semiconductors with electrocatalytic metals, are promising photoelectrocatalysts for efficient and stable photoelectrochemical water splitting. Despite considerable advancements, MIS systems fall significantly below the theoretical photovoltage limits. Important hurdles are the (1) presence of interfacial defects that serve as charge recombination centers and (2) insufficient charge carrier selectivity of the insulators. In this study, we investigate thermal annealing to overcome these obstacles. The impact of annealing is demonstrated by comparing the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance of two MIS systems that employ common insulators (Al 2 O 3 vs HfO 2 ) in Ir/Si photoelectrocatalysts. Experimental and modeling results reveal an elaborate interplay between underlying mechanisms at different annealing conditions. We demonstrate how to quantify these mechanisms, showing that annealing can significantly improve performance by passivating interfacial defects but can also impair the insulators’ charge tunneling characteristics. Insights from this study offer direction toward approaching the maximum photovoltage in MIS photoelectrocatalysts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Michigan
Catalysis Science and Technology Institute
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0007210.1021/acs.accounts.1c00072 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0063110.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00631 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0597610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05976 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat445110.1038/nmat4451 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.06210.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.062 ↗
7. 10.1039/c3ta14443g10.1039/c3ta14443g ↗
8. 10.1002/smtd.20190021210.1002/smtd.201900212 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat480110.1038/nmat4801 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms1596810.1038/ncomms15968 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1174710.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11747 ↗
12. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0192910.1021/acscatal.8b01929 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mssp.2019.02.01210.1016/j.mssp.2019.02.012 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0160910.1021/acsenergylett.9b01609 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20190335410.1002/aenm.201903354 ↗
16. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0352010.1021/acscatal.8b03520 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-021-24229-y10.1038/s41467-021-24229-y ↗
18. 10.1002/smll.20230437610.1002/smll.202304376 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.12810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.128 ↗
20. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0434310.1021/acscatal.0c04343 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-019-11432-110.1038/s41467-019-11432-1 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.5b0037910.1021/acsami.5b00379 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.125142810.1126/science.1251428 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0309210.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03092 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.6b0368810.1021/acsami.6b03688 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20210379810.1002/aenm.202103798 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0004710.1021/acsphotonics.7b00047 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cocis.2019.01.00110.1016/j.cocis.2019.01.001 ↗
29. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0050710.1021/acscatal.7b00507 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.7b1698610.1021/acsami.7b16986 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0031910.1021/acsaem.0c00319 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.0601603jes10.1149/2.0601603jes ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.3c1349110.1021/jacs.3c13491 ↗
34. 10.1088/0022-3727/4/10/31910.1088/0022-3727/4/10/319 ↗
35. 10.1109/EDL.1983.2574810.1109/EDL.1983.25748 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.497398810.1063/1.4973988 ↗