Thermoelectric materials taking advantage of spin entropy: lessons from chalcogenides and oxides
Source abstract
Abstract
The interplay between charges and spins may influence the dynamics of the carriers and determine their thermoelectric properties. In that respect, magneto-thermoelectric power MTEP, i.e. the measurements of the Seebeck coefficient S under the application of an external magnetic field, is a powerful technique to reveal the role of magnetic moments on S. This is illustrated by different transition metal chalcogenides: CuCrTiS4 and CuMnTiS4 magnetic thiospinels, which are compared with magnetic oxides, Curie-Weiss (CW) paramagnetic misfit cobaltites, ruthenates, either ferromagnetic perovskite or Pauli paramagnet quadruple perovskites, and CuGa1-xMnxTe2 chalcopyrite telluride and Bi1.99Cr0.01Te3 in which diluted magnetism is induced by 3%-Mn and 1%-Cr substitution, respectively. In the case of a ferromagnet (below TC) and CW paramagnetic materials, the increase of magnetization at low T when a magnetic field is applied is accompanied by a decrease of the entropy of the carriers and hence S decreases. This is consistent with the lack of MTEP in the Pauli paramagnetic quadruple perovskites. Also, no significant MTEP is observed in CuGa1-xMnxTe2 and Bi1.99Cr0.01Te3, for which Kondo-type interaction between magnetic moments and carriers prevails. In contrast, spin glass CuCrTiS4 exhibits negative MTEP like in ferromagnetic ruthenates and paramagnetic misfit cobaltites. This investigation of some chalcogenides and oxides provides key ingredients to select magnetic materials for which S benefits from spin entropy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Educational Tools and Methods · Education and Technology Integration · Usability and User Interface Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire de Cristallographie et Sciences des Matériaux (CRISMAT), Normandie Université, UMR6508 CNRS, ENSICAEN, UNICAEN, Caen, France
Department of Physics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India
IMPMC, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (WPI-MANA), National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan
Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
Funding
JST Mirai Program
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.115889910.1126/science.1158899 ↗
2. 10.1080/14686996.2018.153093810.1080/14686996.2018.1530938 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.115972510.1126/science.1159725 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0999610.1038/nature09996 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmat.2015.09.00110.1016/j.jmat.2015.09.001 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0TA08484K10.1039/D0TA08484K ↗
7. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/28/03710.1088/0953-8984/16/28/037 ↗
8. 10.1038/nature0163910.1038/nature01639 ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20170201310.1002/smll.201702013 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.12511010.1103/PhysRevB.76.125110 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.23660310.1103/PhysRevLett.87.236603 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.04660110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.046601 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.482608910.1063/1.4826089 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.475829810.1063/1.4758298 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.511678810.1063/1.5116788 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.11520110.1103/PhysRevB.100.115201 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.22210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.222 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.09.06710.1016/j.jallcom.2012.09.067 ↗
19. 10.7567/APEX.6.04300110.7567/APEX.6.043001 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20150551710.1002/anie.201505517 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.503682810.1063/1.5036828 ↗
22. 10.1039/C6TA11120C10.1039/C6TA11120C ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2019.03.00410.1016/j.mtphys.2019.03.004 ↗
24. 10.1088/0953-8984/15/17/32310.1088/0953-8984/15/17/323 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.05241210.1103/PhysRevB.73.052412 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.04510610.1103/PhysRevB.91.045106 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1405710.1103/PhysRevB.60.14057 ↗
28. 10.1016/0304-8853(95)00963-910.1016/0304-8853(95)00963-9 ↗
29. 10.1134/1.113107910.1134/1.1131079 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.physb.2012.01.12010.1016/j.physb.2012.01.120 ↗
31. 10.1016/0038-1098(64)90573-310.1016/0038-1098(64)90573-3 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)02946-410.1016/S0921-4526(99)02946-4 ↗
33. 10.1080/14786435.2012.67840010.1080/14786435.2012.678400 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10019010013310.1007/s100190100133 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.806710.1103/PhysRevB.55.8067 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.10040710.1103/PhysRevB.76.100407 ↗
37. 10.1006/jssc.1994.112410.1006/jssc.1994.1124 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.686910.1103/PhysRevB.62.6869 ↗
39. 10.1002/pssa.20122850510.1002/pssa.201228505 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.271760210.1063/1.2717602 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.12510610.1103/PhysRevB.77.125106 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.03510410.1103/PhysRevB.71.035104 ↗
43. 10.1016/0025-5408(94)90151-110.1016/0025-5408(94)90151-1 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.32110.1103/PhysRevB.56.321 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.03640110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.036401 ↗
46. 10.7566/JPSJ.86.10470710.7566/JPSJ.86.104707 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.15510310.1103/PhysRevB.76.155103 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.439310.1103/PhysRevB.53.4393 ↗
49. 10.1088/0953-8984/8/48/02610.1088/0953-8984/8/48/026 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R1010710.1103/PhysRevB.58.R10107 ↗
51. The values m* shown here are larger than those reported in ref. [17], where the degenerate limit has been assumed. The present calculation based on a parabolic band model suggested that the Lorenz numbers of CuGa1-xMnxTe2 are L = 1.5 to 1.8×10−8 WΩK−2, thereby suggesting the degenerate limit was not appropriate for this case.
52. 10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60616-510.1016/S0081-1947(08)60616-5 ↗
53. 10.15407/spqeo11.03.25710.15407/spqeo11.03.257 ↗
54. 10.1039/C9CC00926D10.1039/C9CC00926D ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.23513110.1103/PhysRevB.88.235131 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.19520310.1103/PhysRevB.81.195203 ↗
57. 10.1126/sciadv.aat593510.1126/sciadv.aat5935 ↗