Minimized Photoelectric Losses in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells via a Discrete Photonic Scaffold
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Minimizing optical and electronic losses is essential for achieving high-efficiency solar cells. Inverted (p-i-n) perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have made great strides toward commercialization, yet light transmittance losses in the indium tin oxide (ITO) photoanode within the 400–700 nm visible spectrum remain a challenge. Here, we construct a discrete photonic scaffold at the poly(triaryl amine) (PTAA)/perovskite interface using zirconium dioxide (ZrO 2 ) nanoparticles, which enhance the visible transmittance of the ITO/PTAA substrate, form a robust perovskite interface, improve photon harvesting, and facilitate the growth of photoactive (100) and (111) perovskite crystal facets. As a result, the ZrO 2 -stack devices, with active areas of 0.1 cm 2 and 1 cm 2, achieve champion power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 25.56% and 24.27%, respectively. The devices retain over 92% of their initial PCEs after 1000 h of 1 sun maximum power point tracking.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Renewable Energy and Storage Technologies (CREST), Division of Physical Science and Engineering (PSE)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Aramco Research Center (ARC)
College of Energy, Soochow Institute for Energy and Materials Innovations
Soochow University
Imaging and Characterization Core Lab
Funding
Saudi Aramco · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · China Scholarship Council
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41578-023-00582-w10.1038/s41578-023-00582-w ↗
2. 10.1038/s41578-024-00678-x10.1038/s41578-024-00678-x ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0007310.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00073 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.adm947410.1126/science.adm9474 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41586-023-06278-z10.1038/s41586-023-06278-z ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-024-07226-110.1038/s41586-024-07226-1 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.ade946310.1126/science.ade9463 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41566-024-01542-810.1038/s41566-024-01542-8 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0193510.1021/acsenergylett.3c01935 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-022-05268-x10.1038/s41586-022-05268-x ↗
11. 10.1126/science.adk163310.1126/science.adk1633 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.abi632310.1126/science.abi6323 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.add878610.1126/science.add8786 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0250310.1021/acsenergylett.3c02503 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20230646610.1002/adma.202306466 ↗
16. 10.1039/D3EE00646H10.1039/D3EE00646H ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20230945910.1002/adma.202309459 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.0c0043410.1021/jacs.0c00434 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0617110.1021/acsnano.2c06171 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-020-58978-510.1038/s41598-020-58978-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11114410.1016/j.solmat.2021.111144 ↗
22. 10.1039/D0EE03387A10.1039/D0EE03387A ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20110427310.1002/adma.201104273 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-020-75630-410.1038/s41598-020-75630-4 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.physb.2022.41451310.1016/j.physb.2022.414513 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.01610.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.016 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11085610.1016/j.solmat.2020.110856 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsaem.4c0137110.1021/acsaem.4c01371 ↗
29. 10.1039/C9EE00872A10.1039/C9EE00872A ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10563310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105633 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20190775710.1002/adma.201907757 ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.3c1283210.1021/jacs.3c12832 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.9b1364810.1021/acsami.9b13648 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20230785510.1002/adma.202307855 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0221010.1021/acsenergylett.0c02210 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20190260010.1002/aenm.201902600 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacs.0c1280210.1021/jacs.0c12802 ↗