Effect of Fluorine Substitution in a Hole Dopant on the Photovoltaic Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Most of the high-efficiency perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are based on the doped spiro-MeOTAD as a hole-transporting layer. Lithium sulfonyl imides with the general chemical formula of LiN(SO2CnF2n+1)2 (n = 0, 1, and 2 for LiFSI, LiTFSI, and LiPFSI, respectively) are candidates for dopants. Although LiTFSI is generally used, it is argued that the power conversion efficiency (PCE) is better for LiPFSI than for LiTFSI due to higher fluorine substitution. In this report, we investigate the effect of the amount of fluorine substitution on photovoltaic performance. Four different researchers fabricated independently PSCs, which reveals that the PCE is highest in the following order, LiTFSI ≈ LiFSI > LiPFSI. The relatively lower performance for LiPFSI is attributed to the interfacial problem and aggregate formation leading to a nonuniform film, which is related to the hydrophobicity and lipophobicity increased by perfluorination. LiFSI however has poor moisture stability due to being less hydrophobic. We draw the conclusion that LiTFSI is a suitable dopant among the studied candidates in terms of both efficiency and stability due to moderate hydrophobicity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical Engineering and Center for Antibonding Regulated Crystals, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
SKKU Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology (SAINT) and Department of Nanoengineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/srep0059110.1038/srep00591 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.122860410.1126/science.1228604 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
4. 10.1039/c1nr10867k10.1039/c1nr10867k ↗
5. NREL. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed 2021-10-11).
6. 10.1038/s41586-021-03964-810.1038/s41586-021-03964-8 ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20190085410.1002/smll.201900854 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.8b0980910.1021/jacs.8b09809 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.01210.1016/j.joule.2018.06.012 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.7b0707110.1021/acsami.7b07071 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7TA01718A10.1039/C7TA01718A ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20181159310.1002/anie.201811593 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20210039610.1002/adfm.202100396 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-021-21803-210.1038/s41467-021-21803-2 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0068510.1021/acsenergylett.1c00685 ↗
16. 10.1039/P2983000082510.1039/P29830000825 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja00271a02910.1021/ja00271a029 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja980371410.1021/ja9803714 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0192210.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01922 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0059710.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00597 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8CP01468J10.1039/C8CP01468J ↗
22. 10.1021/jp962092d10.1021/jp962092d ↗
23. 10.1021/jp507423p10.1021/jp507423p ↗
24. 10.1021/la000807510.1021/la0008075 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20200743110.1002/adma.202007431 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41586-019-1036-310.1038/s41586-019-1036-3 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20170052210.1002/aenm.201700522 ↗