Significant Carrier Concentration Changes in Native Electrodeposited ZnO
Source abstract
Abstract
We show that unintentional hydrogen doping of ZnO during the electrodeposition process can impact the material's carrier concentration as significantly as others have reported for intentional extrinsic doping. Mott-Schottky analyses on the natively n-type electrodeposits show a decrease in the carrier concentrations from 10(21) to 10(18) cm(-3) with increasing overpotential. A strong link exists between larger optical band gaps (determined from diffuse reflectance spectroscopy) and higher carrier concentrations, which suggests that hydrogen-based doping underlies the n-type conductivity (Moss-Burstein effect). We propose that kinetic defects introduced during growth at larger overpotentials compete with hydrogen doping, thereby leading to lower net carrier concentrations. This has important implications for using the deposition potential to tune other electrodeposit properties such as the growth rate and morphology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Physical Oceanography, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B 3X7, Canada
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Surek T. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2005 · 275 · 29210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.10.093 ↗
2. Özgür Ü. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 041301/1-10310.1063/1.1992666 ↗
3. Lincot D. · Thin Solid Films · 2005 · 487 · 4010.1016/j.tsf.2005.01.032 ↗
4. Ellmer K. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 34 · 309710.1088/0022-3727/34/21/301 ↗
5. Van de Walle C. G. · Nature · 2003 · 423 · 62610.1038/nature01665 ↗
6. Chambers S. A. · Surf. Sci. · 2007 · 601 · 531310.1016/j.susc.2007.10.004 ↗
7. Van de Walle C. G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 101210.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1012 ↗
8. Burstein E. · Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 93 · 63210.1103/PhysRev.93.632 ↗
9. Ishizaki H. · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 411 · 6510.1016/S0040-6090(02)00189-X ↗
10. Rousset J. · Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 53410.1021/cm802765c ↗
11. Izaki M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 68 · 243910.1063/1.116160 ↗
12. Ren T. · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 797610.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.185 ↗
13. Chatman S. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 55210.1021/am800049u ↗
14. Yoshida T. · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 451 · 16610.1016/j.tsf.2003.10.097 ↗
15. Limmer S. J. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 1053510.1021/la061185b ↗
16. Marotti R. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2004 · 82 · 8510.1016/j.solmat.2004.01.008 ↗
17. Mora-Seró I. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 203117/1-310.1063/1.2390667 ↗
18. Windsich C. F. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 1999 · 18 · 167710.1116/1.582406 ↗
19. Fabregat-Santiago F. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · E293−E29810.1149/1.1568741 ↗
20. Pajkossy T. · Solid State Ionics · 2005 · 176 · 199710.1016/j.ssi.2004.06.023 ↗
21. Joint Commission on Powder Diffraction Standards—International Centre for Diffraction Data, “Powder Diffraction File”, 2003.
22. Peulon S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · 86410.1149/1.1838359 ↗
23. Bard A. J. · 2001
24. Vlasenko L. S. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 72 · 03520310.1103/PhysRevB.72.035203 ↗
25. Janotti A. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 76 · 165202/110.1103/PhysRevB.76.165202 ↗
26. Oba F. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 82410.1063/1.1380994 ↗
27. Lavrov E. V. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 66 · 165205/1-710.1103/PhysRevB.66.165205 ↗
28. Jokela S. J. · Physica B · 2007 · 401 · 39510.1016/j.physb.2007.08.196 ↗
29. Wardle M. G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 205504/1-410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.205504 ↗