Charge Carrier Recombination at Perovskite/Hole Transport Layer Interfaces Monitored by Time-Resolved Spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Carrier recombination at the interface between charge extraction layers and the perovskite photoactive layer in solar cells reduces the quasi-Fermi level splitting (QFLS) and hence the device’s open-circuit voltage (VOC). Distinguishing between interfacial carrier recombination and charge extraction requires selective probing of carrier dynamics with transient optical spectroscopy techniques. However, bulk recombination, interfacial recombination, and charge extraction all contribute to the transient response, making a precise determination of individual rates challenging. Here, we compare two commonly used hole transport layers (HTLs), namely, PTAA and NiOx, adjacent to prototypical MAPI3 perovskite photoactive layers and wide-bandgap perovskites. We demonstrate that combining time-resolved photoluminescence (TR-PL) and transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy measurements can reveal recombination losses associated with the perovskite/NiOx interface, as confirmed by drift-diffusion simulations. The best performing MAPI3/PTAA-based device exhibits less nonradiative recombination and more efficient charge extraction, facilitated by favorable energy level alignment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), KAUST Solar Center (KSC), Physical Sciences and Engineering Division (PSE), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Funding
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. NREL Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed October 2021).
2. 10.1002/advs.20150032410.1002/advs.201500324 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20160175710.1002/anie.201601757 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10563310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105633 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20210166210.1002/aenm.202101662 ↗
6. 10.1039/C9EE02020A10.1039/C9EE02020A ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.00410.1016/j.joule.2020.06.004 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.0c0296010.1021/acsami.0c02960 ↗
9. 10.1039/C7SE00603A10.1039/C7SE00603A ↗
10. 10.1063/1.494301910.1063/1.4943019 ↗
11. 10.1039/D0EE02337J10.1039/D0EE02337J ↗
12. 10.1002/admi.20200036610.1002/admi.202000366 ↗
13. 10.1039/C6TA09493G10.1039/C6TA09493G ↗
14. 10.1007/s12598-020-01676-y10.1007/s12598-020-01676-y ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0250210.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02502 ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20190413410.1002/aenm.201904134 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20200348910.1002/aenm.202003489 ↗
18. 10.1002/aenm.20160235810.1002/aenm.201602358 ↗
19. 10.1080/14686996.2019.163395210.1080/14686996.2019.1633952 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.01310.1016/j.joule.2021.05.013 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0126310.1021/acsaem.8b01263 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0247510.1021/acsenergylett.0c02475 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41566-019-0546-810.1038/s41566-019-0546-8 ↗
24. 10.1039/C9TC05759E10.1039/C9TC05759E ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0003210.1021/acsaem.1c00032 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.492943510.1063/1.4929435 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.03110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.031 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.10.03610.1016/j.solmat.2014.10.036 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20190163110.1002/aenm.201901631 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41560-018-0219-810.1038/s41560-018-0219-8 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep4462910.1038/srep44629 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0205810.1021/acsenergylett.8b02058 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.10.00310.1016/j.joule.2019.10.003 ↗
34. 10.1039/D0TA03951A10.1039/D0TA03951A ↗