Nonradiative Energy Transfer between Thickness-Controlled Halide Perovskite Nanoplatelets
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Despite showing great promise for optoelectronics, the commercialization of halide perovskite nanostructure-based devices is hampered by inefficient electrical excitation and strong exciton binding energies. While transport of excitons in an energy-tailored system via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) could be an efficient alternative, halide ion migration makes the realization of cascaded structures difficult. Here, we show how these could be obtained by exploiting the pronounced quantum confinement effect in two-dimensional CsPbBr 3 -based nanoplatelets (NPls). In thin films of NPls of two predetermined thicknesses, we observe an enhanced acceptor photoluminescence (PL) emission and a decreased donor PL lifetime. This indicates a FRET-mediated process, benefitted by the structural parameters of the NPls. We determine corresponding transfer rates up to k FRET = 0.99 ns –1 and efficiencies of nearly η FRET = 70%. We also show FRET to occur between perovskite NPls of other thicknesses. Consequently, this strategy could lead to tailored energy cascade nanostructures for improved optoelectronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Strong Light-Matter Interactions · 2D Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanospectroscopy Group and Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Nano-Institute Munich, Department of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Königinstr. 10, 80539 Munich, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Bayerisches Staatsministerium f?r Bildung und Kultus, Wissenschaft und Kunst · H2020 European Research Council
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0013610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00136 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0064410.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00644 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl504877910.1021/nl5048779 ↗
4. Fakharuddin A. · 2018 · 18710.1007/978-981-10-5924-7_5 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0544210.1021/acsnano.7b05442 ↗
6. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.15210.1038/nenergy.2016.152 ↗
7. 10.1039/C5EE03874J10.1039/C5EE03874J ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170461110.1002/adma.201704611 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41586-018-0575-310.1038/s41586-018-0575-3 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0082910.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00829 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat427110.1038/nmat4271 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-018-04073-310.1038/s41467-018-04073-3 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41563-019-0416-210.1038/s41563-019-0416-2 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20170421710.1002/adma.201704217 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.5b0379610.1021/jacs.5b03796 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20150827610.1002/anie.201508276 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0096310.1021/acsphotonics.6b00963 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.8b0784310.1021/jacs.8b07843 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41563-018-0018-410.1038/s41563-018-0018-4 ↗
20. 10.1039/C5EE02733K10.1039/C5EE02733K ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20150047710.1002/aenm.201500477 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5EE01265A10.1039/C5EE01265A ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0049910.1021/acsenergylett.6b00499 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0653610.1021/acsnano.5b06536 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0098210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00982 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20160289710.1002/adma.201602897 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0298510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02985 ↗
28. 10.1039/C4NR06003B10.1039/C4NR06003B ↗
29. 10.1038/nmat423110.1038/nmat4231 ↗
30. 10.1038/nnano.2016.11010.1038/nnano.2016.110 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0476810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04768 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20180081810.1002/adma.201800818 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0219010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02190 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20160590910.1002/anie.201605909 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1282810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12828 ↗
36. Majoul I. · 2006 · 78810.1007/978-0-387-45524-2_45 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0193910.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01939 ↗