What Limits the Open-Circuit Voltage of Bromide Perovskite-Based Solar Cells?
Source abstract
Abstract
High band gap Pb bromide perovskite (APbBr3)-based solar cells, where A is a mixture of formamidinium, methylammonium, and Cs, show significantly higher, relative, VOC losses than their iodide analogs. Using photoluminescence-, quantum efficiency-, and surface photovoltage-spectroscopy measurements, we show the absence of any significant electronically active tail states within the bulk of the (FA0.85MA0.1Cs0.05)PbBr3 absorber. All methods confirm that EG = 2.28 eV for this halide perovskite, HaP. Contact potential difference measurements for this HaP, on different substrates, reveal a Z-shape dependence between the substrate work functions and that of the HaP, deposited on it, indicating that the HaP is relatively low doped and that its Fermi level is affected by the substrate onto which it is deposited. We confirm results from electron beam-induced current (EBIC) and other measurements that most voltage loss of cells, made with these HaP films, is at the HaP/selective-contact interface, specifically the TiO2/HaP one, and provide a complete account of these cells’ VOC losses. Capacitance measurements indicate that 350 mV VOC could be gained by eliminating (fast) interfacial states, emphasizing the importance of interface passivation. Still, even passivating the TiO2/HaP interface cannot eliminate the band misalignment with Br-based HaPs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials & Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
Funding
United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation · Ullmann Family Foundation
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20130462010.1002/adma.201304620 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aah555710.1126/science.aah5557 ↗
3. 10.1002/solr.20180008310.1002/solr.201800083 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20110087710.1002/adma.201100877 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0021510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00215 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aaa272510.1126/science.aaa2725 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.499597010.1063/1.4995970 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0488410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04884 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0072710.1021/acsenergylett.6b00727 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0007710.1021/acsenergylett.6b00077 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5NR07739G10.1039/C5NR07739G ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0054010.1021/acsenergylett.8b00540 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20180039810.1002/aenm.201800398 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0050910.1021/acsenergylett.8b00509 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0257610.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02576 ↗
16. 10.1039/b921624c10.1039/b921624c ↗
17. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.06.00510.1016/j.orgel.2017.06.005 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6CP08392G10.1039/C6CP08392G ↗
19. 10.1063/1.496612710.1063/1.4966127 ↗
20. 10.1039/b812468j10.1039/b812468j ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20110052210.1002/aenm.201100522 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0111910.1021/acsaem.8b01119 ↗
23. Sze S. m. · 2006 · 510.1002/9780470068328.ch1 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0423310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04233 ↗
25. 10.1021/nn505723h10.1021/nn505723h ↗