Machine Learning for Understanding Compatibility of Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Perovskites with Post-Treatment Amines
Source abstract
Abstract
Post-treatment is one of the facile and effective approaches to stabilize organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites. In this work, we apply a machine learning technique to study the trend of reactivity of different types of amines, which are used for the post-treatment of organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite films. Fifty amines are classified based on their compatibility with the methylammonium lead iodide films. Machine learning models are constructed from the classification of these amines and their molecular descriptor features. The model has achieved 86% accuracy on predicting the outcomes of whether perovskite films are maintained after post-treatment. By analyzing the constructed models, it was found that amines with fewer hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, more steric bulk, secondary, tertiary amines, and pyridine derivatives tend to have high compatibility with perovskite films.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
Department of Chemical Physics, School of Chemistry and Material Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230022, China
Institute of Laser & Micro/Nano Engineering, College of Electronics & Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aam632310.1126/science.aam6323 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature2387710.1038/nature23877 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature1250910.1038/nature12509 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature1413310.1038/nature14133 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1830610.1038/nature18306 ↗
6. 10.1039/C7TA00366H10.1039/C7TA00366H ↗
7. 10.1002/ente.20170035610.1002/ente.201700356 ↗
8. 10.1002/advs.20170078010.1002/advs.201700780 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.aaa576010.1126/science.aaa5760 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.124316710.1126/science.1243167 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.124398210.1126/science.1243982 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.03.02110.1016/j.mattod.2017.03.021 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aam709310.1126/science.aam7093 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00110.1016/j.joule.2018.05.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.08.03810.1016/j.solmat.2017.08.038 ↗
16. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/images/efficiency-chart-20180716.jpg (accessed July 2018).
17. 10.1021/ja511132a10.1021/ja511132a ↗
18. 10.1039/C3TA13606J10.1039/C3TA13606J ↗
19. 10.1039/C5EE03522H10.1039/C5EE03522H ↗
20. 10.1039/C7TA01325F10.1039/C7TA01325F ↗
21. 10.1021/nn503647610.1021/nn5036476 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5CC00128E10.1039/C5CC00128E ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b1128610.1021/acsami.5b11286 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20160306210.1002/adma.201603062 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5NR01820J10.1039/C5NR01820J ↗
26. 10.1038/nenergy.2015.1610.1038/nenergy.2015.16 ↗
27. 10.1039/C8EE00580J10.1039/C8EE00580J ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.02.01510.1016/j.solmat.2018.02.015 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41586-018-0337-210.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0008710.1021/acs.accounts.8b00087 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0422910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04229 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0104610.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01046 ↗
33. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0049210.1021/acscentsci.7b00492 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.00210.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41524-017-0056-510.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
36. 10.1038/nature1743910.1038/nature17439 ↗
37. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b0021310.1021/acscentsci.8b00213 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-018-06322-x10.1038/s41467-018-06322-x ↗
39. 10.1021/jacs.8b0391310.1021/jacs.8b03913 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0017010.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00170 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41524-018-0081-z10.1038/s41524-018-0081-z ↗
42. 10.1038/nature2597810.1038/nature25978 ↗
43. Han X. · arXiv Prepr. arXiv1806.11369 · 2018
44. 10.1038/s41598-017-02303-010.1038/s41598-017-02303-0 ↗
45. 10.1002/jcc.2476410.1002/jcc.24764 ↗
46. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0006410.1021/acscentsci.7b00064 ↗
47. 10.1107/S010876810200694810.1107/S0108768102006948 ↗
48. Salman R. · 2012 · 1
49. 10.1021/ci600234z10.1021/ci600234z ↗
50. Todeschini R. · 200910.1002/9783527628766 ↗
51. Todeschini R. · 2008
52. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
53. Kotsiantis S. B. · Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering: Real Word AI Systems with Applications in eHealth, HCI, Information Retrieval and Pervasive Technologies · 2007 · 160 · 3
54. Fonti, V. Feature Selection Using LASSO; VU Amsterdam, 2017; pp 1–26.
55. 10.1145/1015330.101543510.1145/1015330.1015435 ↗
56. 10.1021/ja00863a00810.1021/ja00863a008 ↗
57. 10.1021/ci034266b10.1021/ci034266b ↗
58. 10.1016/0009-2614(82)80009-210.1016/0009-2614(82)80009-2 ↗