journal article·2017-09-08Open access

Modeling the Performance Limitations and Prospects of Perovskite/Si Tandem Solar Cells under Realistic Operating Conditions

Moritz H. Futscher, Bruno Ehrler

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 2· Issue 9

Abstract

Perovskite/Si tandem solar cells have the potential to considerably out-perform conventional solar cells. Under standard test conditions, perovskite/Si tandem solar cells already outperform the Si single junction. Under realistic conditions, however, as we show, tandem solar cells made from current record cells are hardly more efficient than the Si cell alone. We model the performance of realistic perovskite/Si tandem solar cells under real-world climate conditions, by incorporating parasitic cell resistances, nonradiative recombination, and optical losses into the detailed-balance limit. We show quantitatively that when optimizing these parameters in the perovskite top cell, perovskite/Si tandem solar cells could reach efficiencies above 38% under realistic conditions, even while leaving the Si cell untouched. Despite the rapid efficiency increase of perovskite solar cells, our results emphasize the need for further material development, careful device design, and light management strategies, all necessary for highly efficient perovskite/Si tandem solar cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Nanophotonics, AMOLF, Science Park 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aad442410.1126/science.aad4424 ↗
3. 10.1039/C6EE03397K10.1039/C6EE03397K ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20160240010.1002/aenm.201602400 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0013710.1021/acsenergylett.7b00137 ↗
6. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.228334210.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2283342 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.24110.1038/nphoton.2016.241 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
9. 10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/01810.1088/0022-3727/13/5/018 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.32827210.1063/1.328272 ↗
11. 10.1016/0927-0248(96)00015-310.1016/0927-0248(96)00015-3 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4EE03322A10.1039/C4EE03322A ↗
13. 10.1039/C4CP03788J10.1039/C4CP03788J ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0268610.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02686 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5EE02965A10.1039/C5EE02965A ↗
16. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.252147910.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2521479 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0025410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00254 ↗
18. 10.1002/aenm.20160112810.1002/aenm.201601128 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20160280710.1002/aenm.201602807 ↗
20. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.910.1038/nenergy.2017.9 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20170022810.1002/aenm.201700228 ↗
22. 10.1002/pip.290910.1002/pip.2909 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0040510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00405 ↗
24. Duck B. C. · 2016 · 162410.1109/PVSC.2016.7749896 ↗
25. Paetzold U. W. · 2016 · SoW2C.410.1364/OSE.2016.SoW2C.4 ↗
26. Grant D. · 2015 · PTh3B.310.1364/PV.2015.PTh3B.3 ↗
27. 10.1364/OE.24.0A145410.1364/OE.24.0A1454 ↗
28. 10.1364/OE.25.00A47310.1364/OE.25.00A473 ↗
29. 10.1364/OE.24.0A128810.1364/OE.24.0A1288 ↗
30. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.271340610.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2713406 ↗
31. 10.1039/C5CP05371D10.1039/C5CP05371D ↗
32. 10.1002/pssa.20160030610.1002/pssa.201600306 ↗
33. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.245100010.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2451000 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.aan230110.1126/science.aan2301 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.aaa927210.1126/science.aaa9272 ↗
36. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
37. van Sark W. G. J. H. M. · 2012 · 3247
38. Stoffel, T.; Andreas, A.Baseline Measurement System (BMS);NREL Solar Radiation Research Laboratory (SRRL):Golden, Colorado, 1981.
39. 10.1109/T-ED.1984.2159410.1109/T-ED.1984.21594 ↗
40. 10.1039/c3ee42282h10.1039/c3ee42282h ↗
41. 10.1063/1.489677910.1063/1.4896779 ↗
42. 10.1039/C4CP00460D10.1039/C4CP00460D ↗
43. 10.1126/science.aad584510.1126/science.aad5845 ↗
44. 10.1088/2040-8978/18/6/06401210.1088/2040-8978/18/6/064012 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20140393910.1002/adma.201403939 ↗
46. 10.1002/adma.20150404510.1002/adma.201504045 ↗
47. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:15<1281::AID-ADMA1281>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:15<1281::AID-ADMA1281>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20150114510.1002/adma.201501145 ↗
49. 10.1002/pip.291910.1002/pip.2919 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0109210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01092 ↗
51. 10.1002/pip.281110.1002/pip.2811 ↗
52. Sites J. · 2016 · 2016 · 3632
53. Kayes, B. M.; Nie, H.; Twist, R.; Spruytte, S. G.; Reinhardt, F.; Kizilyalli, I. C.; Higashi, G. S.27.6% Conversion Efficiency, a New Record for Single-Junction Solar Sells under 1 Sun Illumination.2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference;IEEE:New York, 2011; pp4–8.10.1109/PVSC.2011.6185831 ↗
54. 10.1021/jz500528510.1021/jz5005285 ↗
55. 10.1039/C7EE01232B10.1039/C7EE01232B ↗