Defects in Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals: Analogies and (Many) Differences with the Bulk
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding the origin of defects in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals is paramount to attaining long-term structural stability and improved optical efficiency, key features for their successful implementation in optoelectronic devices. Unlike other studies, we explore the possible formation of trap states in explicit, nonperiodic CsPbBr3 nanocrystal models about 3 nm in size. Using density functional theory, we compute the defect formation energies of interstitial, vacancy, and antisite defects in different regions of the nanocrystal (center, surface center, and surface edge), demonstrating that the most stable defect position is found at the surface. We ascribe the high defect tolerance of CsPbBr3 nanocrystals to the fact that vacancies, i.e. the loss of surface ligands as ion pairs, are energetically difficult to form and only excessive stripping of surface ligands might be problematic, as their detachment leaves undercoordinated Br- on the crystal surface that only in this case translates into deep traps.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Nanochemistry, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy
Funding
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0003510.1021/acsenergylett.8b00035 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0166910.1021/acsenergylett.8b01669 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aam632310.1126/science.aam6323 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0059510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00595 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.7b1061210.1021/acsami.7b10612 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl504877910.1021/nl5048779 ↗
7. 10.3390/nano902017210.3390/nano9020172 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.6b0890010.1021/jacs.6b08900 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0246010.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02460 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms905610.1038/ncomms9056 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b0252910.1021/acsami.6b02529 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20160078410.1002/adma.201600784 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0207310.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02073 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.7b0338210.1021/acsami.7b03382 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20160105410.1002/adfm.201601054 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20160006410.1002/adma.201600064 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.aag270010.1126/science.aag2700 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.8b0498410.1021/jacs.8b04984 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20180581010.1002/adfm.201805810 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0124410.1021/acsenergylett.7b01244 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0280010.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02800 ↗
22. 10.1039/C6EE01729K10.1039/C6EE01729K ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20150516210.1002/adma.201505162 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0386310.1021/acsnano.6b03863 ↗
25. 10.1002/solr.20180030210.1002/solr.201800302 ↗
26. Connelly N. G. · 2005 · 128
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.233910.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2339 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.07520510.1103/PhysRevB.63.075205 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6CC01500J10.1039/C6CC01500J ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0115410.1021/acsnano.5b01154 ↗
31. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.47852210.1063/1.478522 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0629510.1021/acsnano.5b06295 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0283410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02834 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0014010.1021/acsenergylett.9b00140 ↗
37. 10.1039/C8NR08116F10.1039/C8NR08116F ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.7b0140910.1021/jacs.7b01409 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0526210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05262 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0242510.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02425 ↗