A Rat Model of Lateral Ankle Sprain Induced by Manual Manipulation, with Controlled Force and Angle: An Experimental Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Closed modeling methods for lateral ankle sprain (ALAS) avoid surgical drawbacks but lack standardization due to reliance on the operator's subjective force, leading to variable outcomes. This study aimed to refine a closed ALAS rat model by quantifying manipulation parameters and establishing optimal ranges for different injury grades. Ninety rats were randomly assigned to groups receiving manual ankle inversion under different combinations of force (0-8 N or 8-16 N) and plantar flexion angle (100°-130° or 130°-160°), with control groups. A flexible thin-film pressure sensor and a goniometer were used to standardize the applied force and angle. Multimodal assessments were conducted, including ankle thickness and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) length measurement, micro-CT, MRI, histopathology (HE and Masson's staining), pain threshold testing, and CatWalk gait analysis at multiple time points up to 28 days postmodeling. The severity of the injury was directly correlated with the applied force and angle. Group D (8-16 N, 130°-160°) exhibited the most severe damage, including avulsion fractures, significant CFL elongation and partial tearing, diffuse MRI signal alterations, and prolonged pain and gait instability (>28 days). Groups A and B (0-8 N, both angles) induced mild injuries (slight edema, minor fiber loosening) with rapid functional recovery by day 7. Group C (8-16 N, 100°-130°) resulted in moderate, partial-thickness ligament injuries with recovery by day 10. Behavioral and imaging findings consistently demonstrated a dose-dependent response to the modeling parameters. This study successfully established a modified and quantifiable closed ALAS rat model. The optimal parameters for a grade I ALAS model are 0-8 N of force with plantar flexion of 100°-130° or 130°-160°. For a grade II ALAS model, the parameters are 8-15 N of force with plantar flexion of 100°-130°. This standardized model enhances reproducibility and provides a reliable foundation for future research into ALAS mechanisms and therapies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Foot and Ankle Surgery · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Beijing Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Degenerative Diseases with Shuzhi Traditional Chinese Medicine
Funding
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Traditional Chinese Medicine Inheritance and Innovation Team Project
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1197/j.aem.2007.03.135410.1197/j.aem.2007.03.1354 ↗
2. 10.3810/psm.1997.03.120110.3810/psm.1997.03.1201 ↗
3. 10.1136/bjsports-2017-09888510.1136/bjsports-2017-098885 ↗
4. 10.2519/jospt.2021.030210.2519/jospt.2021.0302 ↗
5. 10.1136/bjsm.35.2.10310.1136/bjsm.35.2.103 ↗
6. 10.1001/archfami.8.2.14310.1001/archfami.8.2.143 ↗
7. 10.4085/1062-6050-365-1610.4085/1062-6050-365-16 ↗
8. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-09618910.1136/bjsports-2016-096189 ↗
9. 10.1186/s12891-022-05164-510.1186/s12891-022-05164-5 ↗
10. 10.1007/s40279-013-0102-510.1007/s40279-013-0102-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.07410.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.074 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00164-110.1016/S0304-3959(02)00164-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.04.03410.1016/j.pain.2007.04.034 ↗
14. 10.70389/PJS.10008210.70389/PJS.100082 ↗
15. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-410.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-4 ↗
16. 10.1371/journal.pbio.100041210.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 ↗
17. 10.1186/s12891-021-04270-010.1186/s12891-021-04270-0 ↗
18. 10.2147/JPR.S18641310.2147/JPR.S186413 ↗
19. 10.1002/jor.2416710.1002/jor.24167 ↗
20. 10.1186/s13075-015-0700-810.1186/s13075-015-0700-8 ↗
21. 10.1163/15685600477312140010.1163/156856004773121400 ↗
22. 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91634-310.1016/0006-8993(86)91634-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00163-810.1016/S1063-4584(03)00163-8 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12264-018-00331-y10.1007/s12264-018-00331-y ↗
25. 10.1089/0897715015050261310.1089/08977150150502613 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.11307910.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113079 ↗
27. 10.1186/s12915-015-0154-010.1186/s12915-015-0154-0 ↗
28. 10.1152/jn.00853.201010.1152/jn.00853.2010 ↗
29. 10.1152/jn.00852.201010.1152/jn.00852.2010 ↗
30. 10.4085/1062-6050-51.11.1310.4085/1062-6050-51.11.13 ↗
31. 10.4085/1062-6050-135-1810.4085/1062-6050-135-18 ↗
32. 10.4085/1062-6050-38-1810.4085/1062-6050-38-18 ↗
33. 10.1002/jor.2545810.1002/jor.25458 ↗
34. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.92798710.3389/fbioe.2022.927987 ↗
35. 10.1002/ejp.90910.1002/ejp.909 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00167-019-05626-910.1007/s00167-019-05626-9 ↗
37. 10.1186/s12998-022-00445-110.1186/s12998-022-00445-1 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbmr.14110.1002/jbmr.141 ↗
39. 10.1002/jmri.2936110.1002/jmri.29361 ↗
40. 10.3389/fspor.2025.156940710.3389/fspor.2025.1569407 ↗
41. 10.1002/jor.2471810.1002/jor.24718 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.10323010.1016/j.msksp.2024.103230 ↗
43. 10.1097/MD.000000000003108710.1097/MD.0000000000031087 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.01.00510.1016/j.jsams.2014.01.005 ↗