journal article·2017-10-09

Bioerosion of Synthetic Sling Explants

Katherine E. Washington, Gina Quiram, Angela Nguyen, Ruvanthi N. Kularatne, Majid Minary-Jolandan, Philippe Zimmern, Mihaela C. Stefan

Publisher page

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the changes over time in polypropylene (PP) mesh explants from women with stress urinary incontinence originally treated with a midurethral PP sling. Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 10 PP explants removed for pain or obstructive symptoms between January and June 2016 were analyzed through various techniques to determine the degradation of the material in vivo. Exclusion criteria were exposed or infected mesh sling or sling in place for less than six months. One pristine control was studied for comparison. The explant samples were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy to visualize the surface defects as well as infrared spectroscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to determine if the degradation was oxidative in nature. The results show qualitative and quantitative bioerosion over the surface of the explant samples and an increase in the content of oxygen pointing toward oxidative degradation occurring in vivo.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pelvic floor disorders treatments · Hernia repair and management · Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75204, United States

Funding

Division of Chemistry · Welch Foundation · Division of Materials Research

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00192-011-1476-210.1007/s00192-011-1476-2 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00192-009-1021-810.1007/s00192-009-1021-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.015 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00192-012-1718-y10.1007/s00192-012-1718-y ↗
5. Cacciari I. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 1993 · 59 · 369510.1128/aem.59.11.3695-3700.1993 ↗
6. 10.1080/11024159875000515610.1080/110241598750005156 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.b.3076410.1002/jbm.b.30764 ↗
8. 10.5271/sjweh.234710.5271/sjweh.2347 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.82010061110.1002/jbm.820100611 ↗
10. Tzartzeva K. R. · Neurourol. Urodyn. · 2014 · 33 · 820
11. Dillon B. E. · Can. J. Urol. · 2012 · 19 · 6424
12. 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.04510.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.045 ↗
13. 10.1586/17434440.4.5.67510.1586/17434440.4.5.675 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.06610.1016/j.juro.2010.11.066 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.09810.1016/j.urology.2012.07.098 ↗
16. Cozad M. J. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. · 2010 · 94 · 45510.1002/jbm.b.31675 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00192-016-3131-410.1007/s00192-016-3131-4 ↗
18. Rasband, W. S.ImageJ.National Institutes of Health:Bethesda, MD, 1997.
19. 10.1007/s10856-013-4872-y10.1007/s10856-013-4872-y ↗
20. 10.1016/S0146-2776(83)80027-510.1016/S0146-2776(83)80027-5 ↗
21. Pham-Huy L. A. · Int. J. Biomed Sci. · 2008 · 4 · 8910.59566/IJBS.2008.4089 ↗
22. 10.1186/1477-3163-5-1410.1186/1477-3163-5-14 ↗
23. 10.1182/blood.V98.4.123110.1182/blood.V98.4.1231 ↗
24. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02260.x10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02260.x ↗
25. 10.1007/s10029010001710.1007/s100290100017 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10029010001910.1007/s100290100019 ↗
27. 10.5489/cuaj.1010410.5489/cuaj.10104 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00192-011-1399-y10.1007/s00192-011-1399-y ↗
29. Debodinance P. · J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). · 2002 · 31 · 527
30. 10.1007/s10029010000110.1007/s100290100001 ↗