journal article·2023-02-13

Hydroxycamptothecin and Substratum Stiffness Synergistically Regulate Fibrosis of Human Corneal Fibroblasts

Jialin Chen, Qingyun Mo, Qiuzi Long, Renwang Sheng, Zhixuan Chen, Yifan Luo, Chuanquan Liu, Ludvig J. Backman, Yanan Zhang, Wei Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Corneal fibrosis is a common outcome of inappropriate repair associated with trauma or ocular infection. Altered biomechanical properties with increased corneal stiffness is a feature of fibrosis that cause corneal opacities, resulting in severe visual impairment and even blindness. The present study aims to determine the effect of hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) and matrix stiffness on transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)-induced fibrotic processes in human corneal fibroblasts (HTK cells). HTK cells were cultured on substrates with different stiffnesses (“soft”, ∼261 kPa; “stiff”, ∼2.5 × 10 3 kPa) and on tissue culture plastic (TCP, ∼10 6 kPa) and simultaneously treated with or without 1 μg/mL HCPT and 10 ng/mL TGF-β1. We found that HCPT induced decreased cell viability and antiproliferative effects on HTK cells. TGF-β1-induced expression of fibrosis-related genes ( FN1, ACTA2 ) was reduced if the cells were simultaneously treated with HCPT. Substrate stiffness did not affect the expression of fibrosis-related genes. The TGF-β1 induced expression of FN1 on both soft and stiff substrates was reduced if cells were simultaneously treated with HCPT. However, this trend was not seen for ACTA2, i.e., the TGF-β1 induced expression of ACTA2 was not reduced by simultaneous treatment of HCPT in either soft or stiff substrate. Instead, HCPT treatment in the presence of TGF-β1 resulted in increased gene expression of keratocyte phenotype makers ( LUM, KERA, AQP1, CHTS6 ) on both substrate stiffnesses. In addition, the protein expression of keratocyte phenotype makers LUM and ALDH3 was increased in HTK cells simultaneously treated with TGF-β1 and HCPT on stiff substrate as compared to control, i.e., without HCPT. In conclusion, we found that HCPT can reduce TGF-β1-induced fibrosis and promote the keratocyte phenotype in a substrate stiffness dependent manner. Thus, HCPT stimulation might be an approach to stimulate keratocytes in the appropriate healing stage to avoid or reverse fibrosis and achieve more optimal corneal wound healing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corneal Surgery and Treatments · Ocular Surface and Contact Lens · Corneal surgery and disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China

Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China

Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

China Orthopedic Regenerative Medicine Group (CORMed), Hangzhou 310058, China

Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China

Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Anatomy, Umeå University, Umeå SE-901 87, Sweden

Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå SE-901 87, Sweden

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Southeast University · Shandong Provincial key research and development program · Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Scholars

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ijms2203129110.3390/ijms22031291 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.00110.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.00210.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12132010.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121320 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.07.03210.1016/j.omtn.2020.07.032 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.08.04010.1016/j.bpj.2020.08.040 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0051010.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00510 ↗
8. 10.1167/iovs.63.1.2210.1167/iovs.63.1.22 ↗
9. 10.1074/jbc.M30329220010.1074/jbc.M303292200 ↗
10. 10.1111/jcmm.1516810.1111/jcmm.15168 ↗
11. 10.1167/iovs.62.13.1510.1167/iovs.62.13.15 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.exer.2018.02.00310.1016/j.exer.2018.02.003 ↗
13. 10.1186/s13287-020-02016-810.1186/s13287-020-02016-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.11869310.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118693 ↗
15. 10.7150/thno.1325010.7150/thno.13250 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0462110.1038/srep04621 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12013-015-0593-910.1007/s12013-015-0593-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.07.02810.1016/j.ejphar.2008.07.028 ↗
19. 10.1002/iub.201310.1002/iub.2013 ↗
20. 10.1371/journal.pone.003996910.1371/journal.pone.0039969 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.exer.2018.09.00110.1016/j.exer.2018.09.001 ↗
22. 10.1167/iovs.12-1157510.1167/iovs.12-11575 ↗
23. 10.3390/ijms1905129410.3390/ijms19051294 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2009.00742.x10.1111/j.1463-5224.2009.00742.x ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.06210.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.062 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.12194110.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121941 ↗
27. 10.3389/fphar.2019.0096710.3389/fphar.2019.00967 ↗
28. 10.3892/mmr.2019.992710.3892/mmr.2019.9927 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.micron.2012.02.01410.1016/j.micron.2012.02.014 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.05110.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.051 ↗
31. 10.3389/fcell.2022.88675910.3389/fcell.2022.886759 ↗
32. 10.3390/ijms2211570810.3390/ijms22115708 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-020-65878-110.1038/s41598-020-65878-1 ↗