journal article·2021-12-13Open access

Measuring the Effects of Cytokines on the Modification of Pericellular Rheology by Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Maryam Daviran, John A. McGlynn, Jenna A. Catalano, Hannah E. Knudsen, Kilian J. Druggan, Kiera J. Croland, Amanda Stratton, Kelly M. Schultz

Abstract

Implantable hydrogels are designed to treat wounds by providing structure and delivering additional cells to damaged tissue. These materials must consider how aspects of the native wound, including environmental chemical cues, affect and instruct delivered cells. One cell type researchers are interested in delivering are human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) due to their importance in healing. Wound healing involves recruiting and coordinating a variety of cells to resolve a wound. hMSCs coordinate the cellular response and are signaled to the wound by cytokines, including transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), present in vivo. These cytokines change hMSC secretions, regulating material remodeling. TGF-β, present from inflammation through remodeling, directs hMSCs to reorganize collagen, increasing extracellular matrix (ECM) structure. TNF-α, present primarily during inflammation, cues hMSCs to clear debris and degrade ECM. Because cytokines change how hMSCs degrade their microenvironment and are naturally present in the wound, they also affect how hMSCs migrate out of the scaffold to conduct healing. Therefore, the effects of cytokines on hMSC remodeling are important when designing materials for cell delivery. In this work, we encapsulate hMSCs in a polymer–peptide hydrogel and incubate the scaffolds in media with TGF-β or TNF-α at concentrations similar to those in wounds. Multiple particle tracking microrheology (MPT) measures hMSC-mediated scaffold degradation in response to these cytokines, which mimics aspects of the in vivo microenvironment post-implantation. MPT uses video microscopy to measure Brownian motion of particles in a material, quantifying structure and rheology. Using MPT, we measure increased hMSC-mediated remodeling when cells are exposed to TNF-α and decreased remodeling after exposure to TGF-β when compared to untreated hMSCs. This agrees with previous studies that measure: (1) TNF-α encourages matrix reorganization and (2) TGF-β signals the formation of new matrix. These results enable material design that anticipates changes in remodeling after implantation, improving control over hMSC delivery and healing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Mesenchymal stem cell research · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Iacocca Hall, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States

Department of Bioengineering, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Iacocca Hall, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · National Institute of General Medical Sciences

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00397-019-01142-210.1007/s00397-019-01142-2 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsabm.8b0039010.1021/acsabm.8b00390 ↗
3. 10.1039/C8SM00408K10.1039/C8SM00408K ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.151130411210.1073/pnas.1511304112 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.02610.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.00910.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.009 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.073738110010.1073/pnas.0737381100 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0043210.1021/acs.biomac.0c00432 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0100510.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b01005 ↗
10. 10.1002/bit.2236110.1002/bit.22361 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.04810.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.048 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0114710.1021/acsabm.9b01147 ↗
13. 10.1038/nbt81810.1038/nbt818 ↗
14. 10.5966/sctm.2011-001810.5966/sctm.2011-0018 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0301-472X(00)00482-310.1016/S0301-472X(00)00482-3 ↗
16. 10.1038/nrm304910.1038/nrm3049 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.it.2011.11.00410.1016/j.it.2011.11.004 ↗
18. 10.1186/scrt11110.1186/scrt111 ↗
19. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.0014810.3389/fimmu.2014.00148 ↗
20. 10.1089/wound.2015.062710.1089/wound.2015.0627 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20130236410.1002/adma.201302364 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.05310.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.053 ↗
23. 10.1089/adt.2018.87710.1089/adt.2018.877 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.02310.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.023 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x ↗
26. 10.1056/NEJM19990902341100610.1056/NEJM199909023411006 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)92810-310.1016/S0021-9258(18)92810-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.10.01110.1016/j.mcn.2005.10.011 ↗
29. 10.1095/biolreprod46.5.77210.1095/biolreprod46.5.772 ↗
30. 10.1210/jcem.79.2.804597310.1210/jcem.79.2.8045973 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
32. 10.1182/blood-2006-10-05106010.1182/blood-2006-10-051060 ↗
33. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1997.50106.x10.1046/j.1524-475X.1997.50106.x ↗
34. 10.1016/S0167-4781(00)00002-610.1016/S0167-4781(00)00002-6 ↗
35. 10.1006/excr.1996.032610.1006/excr.1996.0326 ↗
36. 10.1007/s13346-012-0090-210.1007/s13346-012-0090-2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.06410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.064 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbm.a.3213410.1002/jbm.a.32134 ↗
39. 10.1371/journal.pone.001597810.1371/journal.pone.0015978 ↗
40. 10.1002/biot.20120020510.1002/biot.201200205 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20090096810.1002/adfm.200900968 ↗
42. 10.1039/b710777c10.1039/b710777c ↗
43. 10.1063/5.000612210.1063/5.0006122 ↗
45. 10.1039/c2sm25187f10.1039/c2sm25187f ↗
46. 10.1088/0034-4885/68/3/R0410.1088/0034-4885/68/3/R04 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.328210.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3282 ↗
48. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-14560810.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145608 ↗
49. 10.1007/s00397000009410.1007/s003970000094 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.125010.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1250 ↗
51. 10.1021/ma981296k10.1021/ma981296k ↗
52. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.06110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.061 ↗
53. 10.1039/C2SM27303A10.1039/C2SM27303A ↗
54. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.055 ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20090180810.1002/adma.200901808 ↗
56. Holzheimer R. G. · Eur. J. Med. Res. · 2000 · 5 · 347
57. 10.1006/jcis.1996.021710.1006/jcis.1996.0217 ↗
58. 10.1529/biophysj.104.04245710.1529/biophysj.104.042457 ↗
59. Crocker, J. C.; Weeks, E. R. Particle Tracking Using IDL, 2011. http://www.physics.emory.edu/~weeks/idl/index.html (Dec, 2019).
60. 10.1021/mz300106y10.1021/mz300106y ↗
61. Larsen T. · Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. · 2008 · 20 · 165
62. 10.1039/C6SM00978F10.1039/C6SM00978F ↗
63. 10.1021/la804208q10.1021/la804208q ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.14600110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.146001 ↗
65. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0124610.1021/acs.macromol.7b01246 ↗
66. 10.1021/ma00217a02610.1021/ma00217a026 ↗
67. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0031710.3389/fchem.2019.00317 ↗
68. 10.2741/118410.2741/1184 ↗
69. 10.1091/mbc.e04-04-035310.1091/mbc.e04-04-0353 ↗
70. 10.1091/mbc.01-08-039810.1091/mbc.01-08-0398 ↗