Novel In Vitro Platform for Studying the Cell Response to Healthy and Diseased Tendon Matrices
Source abstract
Abstract
Current in vitro models poorly represent the healthy or diseased tendon microenvironment, limiting the translation of the findings to clinics. The present work aims to establish a physiologically relevant in vitro tendon platform that mimics biophysical aspects of a healthy and tendinopathic tendon matrix using a decellularized bovine tendon and to characterize tendon cells cultured using this platform. Bovine tendons were subjected to various decellularization techniques, with the efficacy of decellularization determined histologically. The biomechanical and architectural properties of the decellularized tendons were characterized using an atomic force microscope. Tendinopathy-mimicking matrices were prepared by treating the decellularized tendons with collagenase for 3 h or collagenase–chondroitinase (CC) for 1 h. The tendon tissue collected from healthy and tendinopathic patients was characterized using an atomic force microscope and compared to that of decellularized matrices. Healthy human tendon-derived cells (hTDCs) from the hamstring tendon were cultured on the decellularized matrices for 24 or 48 h, with cell morphology characterized using f-actin staining and gene expression characterized using real-time PCR. Tendon matrices prepared by freeze–thawing and 48 h nuclease treatment were fully decellularized, and the aligned structure and tendon stiffness (1.46 MPa) were maintained. Collagenase treatment prepared matrices with a disorganized architecture and reduced stiffness (0.75 MPa), mimicking chronic tendinopathy. Treatment with CC prepared matrices with a disorganized architecture without altering stiffness, mimicking early tendinopathy (1.52 MPa). hTDCs on a healthy tendon matrix were elongated, and the scleraxis ( SCX ) expression was maintained. On tendinopathic matrices, hTDCs had altered morphological characteristics and lower SCX expression. The expression of genes related to actin polymerization, matrix degradation and remodeling, and immune cell invasion were higher in hTDCs on tendinopathic matrices. Overall, the present study developed a physiological in vitro system to mimic healthy tendons and early and late tendinopathy, and it can be used to better understand tendon cell characteristics in healthy and diseased states.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tendon Structure and Treatment · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Exercise and Physiological Responses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Department of Orthopaedics, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland 1640, New Zealand
Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Funding
Auckland Medical Research Foundation · Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust · University of Auckland
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncprheum070010.1038/ncprheum0700 ↗
2. Kaux J.-F. · J. Sports Sci. Med. · 2011 · 10 · 238
3. 10.1186/s40621-020-0231-x10.1186/s40621-020-0231-x ↗
4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-810.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jse.2022.06.01010.1016/j.jse.2022.06.010 ↗
6. 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0434.R110.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0434.R1 ↗
7. 10.2106/00004623-199173100-0000910.2106/00004623-199173100-00009 ↗
8. 10.1186/s12891-020-03784-310.1186/s12891-020-03784-3 ↗
9. 10.1371/journal.pone.021186310.1371/journal.pone.0211863 ↗
10. 10.1371/journal.pone.021583010.1371/journal.pone.0215830 ↗
11. 10.1177/088532821877984610.1177/0885328218779846 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.04710.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.047 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76279-510.1016/S0006-3495(00)76279-5 ↗
14. 10.1083/jcb.20040500410.1083/jcb.200405004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.06.00210.1016/j.matbio.2017.06.002 ↗
16. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.80074810.3389/fbioe.2022.800748 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.00410.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.08310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.083 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.addr.2022.11429910.1016/j.addr.2022.114299 ↗
20. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.184310.1089/ten.2006.12.1843 ↗
21. 10.1002/jor.2099910.1002/jor.20999 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.10013010.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100130 ↗
23. 10.1177/0885328221104577010.1177/08853282211045770 ↗
24. 10.1186/s13019-020-01292-y10.1186/s13019-020-01292-y ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.101950610810.1073/pnas.1019506108 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.a.3608310.1002/jbm.a.36083 ↗
27. 10.1007/s12253-008-9005-410.1007/s12253-008-9005-4 ↗
28. 10.1101/PDB.PROT498610.1101/PDB.PROT4986 ↗
29. 10.3389/fnut.2021.72942710.3389/fnut.2021.729427 ↗
30. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-20465710.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204657 ↗
31. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.012810.1089/ten.tea.2014.0128 ↗
32. 10.1096/fj.202100405R10.1096/fj.202100405R ↗
33. 10.1155/2017/983153410.1155/2017/9831534 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41536-022-00220-z10.1038/s41536-022-00220-z ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2012.05.01010.1016/j.jcpa.2012.05.010 ↗
36. 10.1098/RSIF.2013.105810.1098/RSIF.2013.1058 ↗
37. 10.1002/jor.2281810.1002/jor.22818 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.06610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.066 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.08810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.088 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.02210.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.022 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.01710.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.017 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.02310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.023 ↗
43. 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.066610.1089/ten.tec.2013.0666 ↗
44. 10.1002/jbm.a.3408310.1002/jbm.a.34083 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.06110.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.061 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.293700110.1063/1.2937001 ↗
47. 10.1136/ard.53.6.35910.1136/ard.53.6.359 ↗
48. 10.3389/fphys.2020.0070410.3389/fphys.2020.00704 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41598-017-05466-y10.1038/s41598-017-05466-y ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.03510.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.035 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.01110.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.011 ↗
52. 10.1371/journal.pone.016159010.1371/journal.pone.0161590 ↗
53. 10.1186/s12891-019-2488-110.1186/s12891-019-2488-1 ↗
54. 10.4161/cam.2107610.4161/cam.21076 ↗
55. 10.1529/biophysj.108.13311610.1529/biophysj.108.133116 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.029 ↗
57. 10.1172/jci.insight.13829510.1172/jci.insight.138295 ↗
58. 10.7554/eLife.6220310.7554/eLife.62203 ↗
59. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.00198710.1074/jbc.RA118.001987 ↗
60. 10.1186/1471-2474-10-2710.1186/1471-2474-10-27 ↗
61. 10.1002/adhm.20160028410.1002/adhm.201600284 ↗
62. 10.1083/jcb.20111211310.1083/jcb.201112113 ↗
63. 10.1111/J.1067-1927.2004.012502.X10.1111/J.1067-1927.2004.012502.X ↗
64. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-018710.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0187 ↗
65. 10.1074/jbc.274.6.381110.1074/jbc.274.6.3811 ↗
66. 10.1371/journal.pone.000270110.1371/journal.pone.0002701 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.01510.1016/j.addr.2014.11.015 ↗
68. 10.1177/036354650730188510.1177/0363546507301885 ↗
69. 10.1136/bjsports-2017-09816110.1136/bjsports-2017-098161 ↗
70. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac426910.1126/scitranslmed.aac4269 ↗
71. 10.1155/2022/279966510.1155/2022/2799665 ↗
72. 10.1136/ard.2004.02987610.1136/ard.2004.029876 ↗
73. 10.1002/jor.110015010610.1002/jor.1100150106 ↗
74. 10.1111/joa.1291310.1111/joa.12913 ↗
75. 10.1002/jcb.2077610.1002/jcb.20776 ↗
76. 10.1016/S0945-053X(97)90014-710.1016/S0945-053X(97)90014-7 ↗
77. 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05426.x10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05426.x ↗
78. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00328.201610.1152/japplphysiol.00328.2016 ↗
79. 10.1074/jbc.M109.07750310.1074/jbc.M109.077503 ↗
80. 10.1073/pnas.94.5.185210.1073/pnas.94.5.1852 ↗