journal article·2020-10-12

Gelatin Electrospun Mat as a Potential Co-culture System for In Vitro Production of Sperm Cells from Embryonic Stem Cells

Mina Vardiani, Marefat Ghaffari Novin, Morteza Koruji, Hamid Nazarian, Ellen Goossens, Abbas Aghaei, Alexander M. Seifalian, Hatef Ghasemi Hamidabadi, Fatemeh Asgari, Mazaher Gholipourmalekabadi

Publisher page

Abstract

Engineering of 3D substrates with maximum similarity to seminiferous tubules would help to produce functional sperm cells in vitro from stem cells. Here, we present a 3D electrospun gelatin (EG) substrate seeded with Sertoli cells and determine its potential for guided differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) toward germline cells. The EG was fabricated by electrospinning, and its morphology under SEM, as well as cytobiocompatibility for Sertoli cells and ESCs, was confirmed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide and cell attachment assay. Embryoid bodies (EBs) were formed from ESCs and co-cultured with Sertoli cells, induced with BMP4 for 3 and 7 consecutive days to induce the differentiation of EBs toward germline cells. The differentiation was investigated by immunocytochemistry (ICC), flow cytometry, and RT-PCR in four experimental groups of EBs (EBs cultured in gelatin-coated cell culture plates); Scaffold/EB (EBs cultured on EG); ESCs/Ser (EBs and Sertoli cells co-cultured on gelatin-coated cell culture plates without EG); and Scaffold/EB/Ser (EBs and Sertoli cells co-cultured on EG). All experimental groups exhibited a significantly increased MVH (germline-specific marker) and decreased c-KIT (stemness marker) expression when compared with the EB group. ICC and flow cytometry revealed that Scaffold/EB/Ser had the highest level of MVH and the lowest c-KIT expression at both 3 and 7 days postdifferentiation compared with other groups. RT-PCR results showed a significant increase in the germline marker (Dazl) and a significant decrease in the ESC stemness marker (Nanog) in Scaffold/EB compared to the EB group. The germline markers Gcna, Stella, Mvh, Stra8, Piwil2, and Dazl were significantly increased in Scaffold/EB/Ser compared to the Scaffold/EB group. Our findings revealed that the EG scaffold can provide an excellent substrate biomimicking the micro/nanostructure of native seminiferous tubules and a platform for Sertoli cell–EB communication required for growth and differentiation of ESCs into germline cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 19839-63113 Tehran, Iran

Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Aviccena Research Institute, ACECR, 14115-343 Tehran, Iran

Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 19839-63113 Tehran, Iran

Cellular and Molecular Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 14496-14535 Tehran, Iran

Department of Anatomical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 14496-14535 Tehran, Iran

Biology of the Testis Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine Commercialization Centre (Ltd.), The London BioScience Innovation Centre, NW1 0NH London, United Kingdom

Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2093716496 Sari, Iran

Immunogenetic Research Center, Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2093716496 Sari, Iran

Department of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 14496-14535 Tehran, Iran

Funding

Iran University of Medical Sciences

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rstb.2009.020610.1098/rstb.2009.0206 ↗
2. 10.1210/jc.2012-240010.1210/jc.2012-2400 ↗
3. Rieger D. · 2012 · 912 · 33310.1007/978-1-61779-971-6_19 ↗
4. 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04784-910.1016/s0140-6736(98)04784-9 ↗
5. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb03430.x10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb03430.x ↗
6. 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01275-x10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01275-x ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1440-169x.2010.01174.x10.1111/j.1440-169x.2010.01174.x ↗
8. 10.1093/humrep/14.5.128710.1093/humrep/14.5.1287 ↗
9. 10.1002/stem.123810.1002/stem.1238 ↗
10. 10.2174/1574888x1266617062309545710.2174/1574888x12666170623095457 ↗
11. 10.3389/fendo.2013.0018110.3389/fendo.2013.00181 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.04410.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.044 ↗
13. 10.1088/1748-605x/aa999b10.1088/1748-605x/aa999b ↗
14. 10.1111/cpr.1224010.1111/cpr.12240 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.02610.1016/j.msec.2019.04.026 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0161010.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01610 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0057310.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00573 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.03910.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.039 ↗
19. 10.1530/rep-17-034610.1530/rep-17-0346 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mefs.2017.09.00410.1016/j.mefs.2017.09.004 ↗
21. 10.22038/ijbms.2016.781810.22038/ijbms.2016.7818 ↗
22. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab145210.1088/1758-5090/ab1452 ↗
23. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-101810.1634/stemcells.2007-1018 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8BM01001C10.1039/C8BM01001C ↗
25. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.028 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.01510.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.015 ↗
27. 10.2164/jandrol.107.00285710.2164/jandrol.107.002857 ↗
28. 10.1093/molehr/gap05210.1093/molehr/gap052 ↗
29. 10.3390/ijms1912380410.3390/ijms19123804 ↗
30. 10.1177/088532821772317910.1177/0885328217723179 ↗
31. 10.3390/nano802011710.3390/nano8020117 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0054010.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00540 ↗
33. 10.1002/jcb.2851710.1002/jcb.28517 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.04610.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.046 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1215247610.3390/ma12152476 ↗
36. Bernardino R. L. · 2018 · 910.1007/978-1-4939-7698-0_2 ↗
37. Council, N. R. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; National Academies Press, 2010.
38. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0180710.1021/acs.biomac.7b01807 ↗
39. Hamidabadi H. G. · Int. J. Fertil. Steril. · 2011 · 5 · 104
40. 10.1007/s12015-011-9306-y10.1007/s12015-011-9306-y ↗
41. 10.1088/2057-1976/aace8f10.1088/2057-1976/aace8f ↗
42. 10.1007/s13233-009-0103-210.1007/s13233-009-0103-2 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.02110.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.021 ↗
44. 10.1021/bm900036s10.1021/bm900036s ↗
45. 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)69003-910.1016/s0022-5347(05)69003-9 ↗
46. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb02230.x10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb02230.x ↗
47. 10.1530/rep.1.0022010.1530/rep.1.00220 ↗
48. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-020410.1634/stemcells.2005-0204 ↗
49. 10.1530/reprod/124.6.79110.1530/reprod/124.6.791 ↗
50. 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04833-110.1016/s0015-0282(02)04833-1 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10815-011-9541-910.1007/s10815-011-9541-9 ↗
52. 10.1093/hmg/ddq52010.1093/hmg/ddq520 ↗
53. 10.1093/jnci/djp08210.1093/jnci/djp082 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.repbio.2018.09.00610.1016/j.repbio.2018.09.006 ↗
55. 10.1007/s11626-016-0113-210.1007/s11626-016-0113-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.04.00310.1016/j.biologicals.2017.04.003 ↗
57. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab145210.1088/1758-5090/ab1452 ↗
58. 10.29252/ijrm.16.8.50710.29252/ijrm.16.8.507 ↗
59. 10.1089/clo.2007.003110.1089/clo.2007.0031 ↗
60. 10.1042/bsr2016034810.1042/bsr20160348 ↗