Deformation Mechanisms of “Two-Part” Natural Adhesive in Bone Interfibrillar Nano-Interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Noncollagenous proteins at nanoscale interfaces in bone are less than 2-3% of bone content by weight, while they contribute more than 30% to fracture toughness. Major gaps in quantitative understanding of noncollagenous proteins' role in the interfibrillar interfaces, largely because of the limitation of probing their nanoscale dimension, have resulted in ongoing controversies and several outstanding hypotheses on their role and function, arguably going back to centuries ago to the original work from Galileo. Our results from the first detailed computational model of the nano-interface in the bone reveal "synergistic" deformation mechanism of a "double-part" natural glue, that is, noncollagenous osteopontin and osteocalcin at the interfibrillar interface. Specifically, through strong anchoring and formation of dynamic binding sites on mineral nanoplatelets, the nano-interface can sustain a large nonlinear deformation with ductility approaching 5000%. This large deformation results in an outstanding specific energy to failure exceeding ∼350 J/g, which is larger than the most known tough materials (such as Kevlar, spider silk, and so forth.).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone and Dental Protein Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W. Campbell Rd, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States
College of Material and Textile Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research · National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Science Foundation
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adhm.20150007010.1002/adhm.201500070 ↗
2. 10.1038/Bonekey.2015.11210.1038/Bonekey.2015.112 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat222110.1038/nmat2221 ↗
4. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.710.1038/natrevmats.2016.7 ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-09580610.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-095806 ↗
6. 10.1038/NMAT311510.1038/NMAT3115 ↗
7. 10.1021/bm900519v10.1021/bm900519v ↗
8. 10.1021/nn900472n10.1021/nn900472n ↗
9. 10.1038/2160710.1038/21607 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bone.2010.02.01410.1016/j.bone.2010.02.014 ↗
11. 10.1038/414773a10.1038/414773a ↗
12. 10.1098/rsif.2006.017210.1098/rsif.2006.0172 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl071276910.1021/nl0712769 ↗
14. Hansma P. K. · J. Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interact. · 2005 · 5 · 313
15. 10.1038/nmat142810.1038/nmat1428 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.120151310910.1073/pnas.1201513109 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl051584b10.1021/nl051584b ↗
18. 10.1039/c6tb02835g10.1039/c6tb02835g ↗
19. 10.1007/s10237-014-0615-310.1007/s10237-014-0615-3 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat311510.1038/nmat3115 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10704-006-6581-810.1007/s10704-006-6581-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00074-910.1016/s0021-9290(00)00074-9 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.315633210.1063/1.3156332 ↗
24. 10.1098/rsif.2013.099310.1098/rsif.2013.0993 ↗
25. 10.1098/rsif.2010.041310.1098/rsif.2010.0413 ↗
26. 10.1128/MCB.26.1.238-249.200610.1128/MCB.26.1.238-249.2006 ↗
27. 10.1016/s0928-4931(00)00133-810.1016/s0928-4931(00)00133-8 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2794110.1002/app.27941 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20070051610.1002/adma.200700516 ↗
30. 10.1021/nl051419w10.1021/nl051419w ↗
31. 10.1038/3506900010.1038/35069000 ↗
32. 10.1126/science.110427610.1126/science.1104276 ↗
33. 10.1021/nn101404u10.1021/nn101404u ↗
34. 10.1140/epje/e2005-00021-210.1140/epje/e2005-00021-2 ↗
35. Gosline J. · J. Exp. Biol. · 1999 · 202 · 329510.1242/jeb.202.23.3295 ↗
36. 10.5254/1.354010410.5254/1.3540104 ↗
37. 10.1021/nn400028p10.1021/nn400028p ↗
38. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.03010.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.030 ↗
39. 10.1021/bi048336z10.1021/bi048336z ↗
40. 10.1093/nar/gkx109510.1093/nar/gkx1095 ↗
41. Lin, T.J. Force Field Parameters and Atomistic Surface Models for Hydroxyapatite and Analysis of Biomolecular Adsorption at Aqueous Interfaces. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, 2013, p 131.
42. 10.2138/am-1999-091910.2138/am-1999-0919 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.002 ↗
44. 10.1359/jbmr.09083210.1359/jbmr.090832 ↗
45. 10.1074/jbc.272.36.2273610.1074/jbc.272.36.22736 ↗
46. 10.1073/pnas.85.9.291910.1073/pnas.85.9.2919 ↗
47. 10.1529/biophysj.107.12835510.1529/biophysj.107.128355 ↗
48. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10442710.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104427 ↗
49. 10.1007/bf0255645410.1007/bf02556454 ↗
50. 10.1098/rsif.2013.099310.1098/rsif.2013.0993 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.06.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.06.001 ↗
52. 10.1038/nmat142810.1038/nmat1428 ↗
53. 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E ↗