Morphological and Mechanical Biomimetic Bone Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Cortical bone is an example of a mineralized tissue containing a compositional distribution of hard and soft phases in 3-dimensional space for mechanical function. X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is able to describe this compositional and morphological complexity but methods to provide a physical output with comparable mechanical function is lacking. A workflow is presented here to establish a method of using high contrast XCT to establish a virtual model of cortical bone that is manufactured using a multiple material capable 3D printer. Resultant 3D printed structures were produced based on more and less remodelled bone designs exhibiting a range of secondary osteon density. Variation in resultant mechanical properties of the 3D printed composite structures for each bone design was achieved using a combination of material components and reasonable prediction of elastic modulus provided using a Hashin-Shtrikman approach. The ability to 3D print composite structures using high contrast XCT to distinguish between compositional phases in a biological structure promises improved anatomical models as well as next-generation mechano-mimetic implants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, Anglesea Building, Anglesea Road, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, United Kingdom
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, United Kingdom
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10442110.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104421 ↗
2. 10.1098/rsif.2010.041310.1098/rsif.2010.0413 ↗
3. 10.1098/rsif.2013.099310.1098/rsif.2013.0993 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.01810.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.018 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10237-016-0808-z10.1007/s10237-016-0808-z ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.27110.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.271 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00167-010-1054-z10.1007/s00167-010-1054-z ↗
8. 10.3390/ma904026710.3390/ma9040267 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61798-010.1016/S0140-6736(14)61798-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.04810.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.01110.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.011 ↗
12. 10.1177/095441191666776110.1177/0954411916667761 ↗
13. McGurk M. · Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. · 1997 · 79 · 169
14. 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.05110.1016/j.jss.2015.06.051 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.01910.1016/j.joms.2015.04.019 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.01510.1016/j.joms.2012.10.015 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.01710.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20130021510.1002/adfm.201300215 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.11.01010.1016/j.msec.2006.11.010 ↗
20. 10.1121/1.493929710.1121/1.4939297 ↗
21. 10.1557/jmr.2006.014710.1557/jmr.2006.0147 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10237-010-0236-410.1007/s10237-010-0236-4 ↗
23. International Society for Rock Mechanics Commision on Standardization of Laboratory and Field Tests · Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. Geomech. Abstr. · 1978 · 15 · 5310.1016/0148-9062(78)91678-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-710.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01905.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01905.x ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00054-510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00054-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.07.01110.1016/j.medengphy.2009.07.011 ↗