Sulfonated Polyrotaxane Surfaces with Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Alter the Osteogenic Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Short-Term Culture
Source abstract
Abstract
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are prone to senescence and lose their differentiation potential when expanded under nonfavorable conditions. This leads to the underutilization of hMSCs in clinical situations such as bone regeneration. The use of growth factors and small molecules as supplements and changing the physical properties of the cell culture surface have been explored to maintain the self-renewal and differentiation potential of hMSCs during the in vitro expansion phase. Here, we have explored the effect of polyrotaxanes (PRXs) with different molecular mobilities along with either soluble or immobilized fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) in the maintenance of the osteogenic differentiation potential of hMSCs during in vitro expansion. We found that a less expanded shape of the hMSCs was associated with highly mobile PRX surfaces, and less mobile PRX surfaces led to flattened cell morphology. The presence of FGF2 induced further expansion of the cell shape and size. The immobilization of FGF2 helped to improve the yield of hMSCs on highly mobile surfaces by promoting cell attachment to the surfaces. hMSCs cultured on highly mobile PRX surfaces exhibited poor actin cytoskeletal organization and retention of the transcriptional regulator, yes-associated protein (YAP), in cytoplasm in contrast to the hMSCs on less mobile PRX surfaces. When the hMSCs that proliferated under these conditions were collected and subjected to osteogenic differentiation on tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) surfaces, we found that only the hMSCs cultured on highly mobile PRXs with FGF2 in both soluble and immobilized forms showed mineralization indicative of osteogenic differentiation. Further, we found that hMSCs cultured on highly mobile PRX surfaces expressed higher levels of stemness marker genes, Nanog and Oct4. These results indicate that culturing hMSCs on PRX surfaces with different molecular mobilities even for a short period of time (4 days) was sufficient to cause a drastic change in the osteogenic potential. From these results, it is suggested that apart from the use of supplements such as FGF2 in its freely soluble or immobilized form, the consideration of proper molecular mobility of the substrates could enable us to design better culture conditions for the hMSCs with osteogenic potential.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Section of Molecular Craniofacial Embryology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
Department of Organic Biomaterials, Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 2-3-10 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan
Funding
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/trf.1242110.1111/trf.12421 ↗
2. 10.1089/ten.1997.3.17310.1089/ten.1997.3.173 ↗
3. 10.1038/mt.2009.31510.1038/mt.2009.315 ↗
4. 10.1007/s13770-018-0129-710.1007/s13770-018-0129-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.050 ↗
6. 10.1002/jor.110016020210.1002/jor.1100160202 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10856-016-5839-610.1007/s10856-016-5839-6 ↗
8. 10.1002/stem.164910.1002/stem.1649 ↗
9. 10.1186/1471-2121-7-1410.1186/1471-2121-7-14 ↗
10. 10.1007/s13258-010-0868-x10.1007/s13258-010-0868-x ↗
11. Yang Y. · Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi · 2018 · 26 · 307
12. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-012710.1634/stemcells.2007-0127 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.a.3211610.1002/jbm.a.32116 ↗
14. 10.1089/ten.2006.015410.1089/ten.2006.0154 ↗
15. 10.1098/rsif.2013.017910.1098/rsif.2013.0179 ↗
16. 10.1002/adhm.20140017310.1002/adhm.201400173 ↗
17. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.038810.1089/ten.tea.2007.0388 ↗
18. 10.1002/chem.20060037010.1002/chem.200600370 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.08010.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.080 ↗
20. 10.1039/C6RA03967G10.1039/C6RA03967G ↗
21. 10.1002/jcp.2194010.1002/jcp.21940 ↗
22. 10.2217/rme.11.210.2217/rme.11.2 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.033 ↗
24. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.577710.1006/bbrc.2001.5777 ↗
25. 10.1089/scd.2007.023010.1089/scd.2007.0230 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.07.05610.1016/j.febslet.2009.07.056 ↗
27. 10.1038/nature0860210.1038/nature08602 ↗
28. 10.1039/C4PY00379A10.1039/C4PY00379A ↗
29. 10.1080/09205063.2017.131909510.1080/09205063.2017.1319095 ↗
30. 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.5.C134510.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.5.C1345 ↗
31. 10.1371/journal.pone.000221310.1371/journal.pone.0002213 ↗
32. 10.1039/C5TB02215K10.1039/C5TB02215K ↗
33. 10.1371/journal.pone.001565510.1371/journal.pone.0015655 ↗
34. 10.1007/0-306-46869-7_3110.1007/0-306-46869-7_31 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.029 ↗
36. 10.1038/nrm341610.1038/nrm3416 ↗
37. 10.1038/nmat388910.1038/nmat3889 ↗