journal article·2024-02-12

Evaluating the Effects of Pulsed Electrical Stimulation on the Mechanical Behavior and Microstructure of Medulla Oblongata Tissues

Yiqiang Li, Xiangyu Zong, Jiucheng Zhao, Li Yang, Chi Zhang, Hongwei Zhao

Publisher page

Abstract

The development of remote surgery hinges on comprehending the mechanical properties of the tissue at the surgical site. Understanding the mechanical behavior of the medulla oblongata tissue is instrumental for precisely determining the remote surgery implementation site. Additionally, exploring this tissue's response under electric fields can inform the creation of electrical stimulation therapy regimens. This could potentially reduce the extent of medulla oblongata tissue damage from mechanical compression. Various types of pulsed electric fields were integrated into a custom-built indentation device for this study. Experimental findings suggested that applying pulsed electric fields amplified the shear modulus of the medulla oblongata tissue. In the electric field, the elasticity and viscosity of the tissue increased. The most significant influence was noted from the low-frequency pulsed electric field, while the burst pulsed electric field had a minimal impact. At the microstructural scale, the application of an electric field led to the concentration of myelin in areas distant from the surface layer in the medulla oblongata, and the orderly structure of proteoglycans became disordered. The alterations observed in the myelin and proteoglycans under an electric field were considered to be the fundamental causes of the changes in the mechanical behavior of the medulla oblongata tissue. Moreover, cell polarization and extracellular matrix cavitation were observed, with transmission electron microscopy results pointing to laminar separation within the myelin at the ultrastructure scale. This study thoroughly explored the impact of electric field application on the mechanical behavior and microstructure of the medulla oblongata tissue, delving into the underlying mechanisms. This investigation delved into the changes and mechanisms in the mechanical behavior and microstructure of medulla oblongata tissue under the influence of electric fields. Furthermore, this study could serve as a reference for the development of electrical stimulation regimens in the central nervous system. The acquired mechanical behavior data could provide valuable baseline information to aid in the evolution of remote surgery techniques involving the medulla oblongata tissue.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Nerve injury and regeneration · Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Jilin University, 5988 Renmin Street, Changchun 130025, P. R. China

Key Laboratory of CNC Equipment Reliability, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, 5988 Renmin Street, Changchun 130025, P. R. China

Institute of Structured and Architected Materials, Liaoning Academy of Materials, Shenyang 110167, P. R. China

Chongqing Research Institute of Jilin University, Chongqing 401120, China

Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, P. R. China

Funding

National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Navarro, E. M.; Alvarez, A. N. R.; Anguiano, F. I. S. In A New Telesurgery Generation Supported by 5G Technology: Benefits and Future Trends, 3rd International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing (ISM); Elsevier Science Bv, Upper Austria Univ Appl Sci: Hagenberg Campus, Linz, AUSTRIA, 2021; pp 31–38.10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.202 ↗
2. 10.1002/cnr2.159510.1002/cnr2.1595 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00464-020-07823-x10.1007/s00464-020-07823-x ↗
4. Bhattacharya, S.; Rawat, D. In IEEE, Comparative Study of Remote Surgery Techniques, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference GHTC 2015; IEEE: Seattle, WA, 2015; pp 407–413.10.1109/GHTC.2015.7344004 ↗
5. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-01809610.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018096 ↗
6. Tai L. H. · Br. J. Neurosurg. · 2021 · 1853
7. 10.3389/fped.2021.62826510.3389/fped.2021.628265 ↗
8. 10.3109/02688697.2015.109690710.3109/02688697.2015.1096907 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.06.03610.1016/j.jocn.2011.06.036 ↗
10. 10.3892/ol.2017.578210.3892/ol.2017.5782 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00381-021-05090-210.1007/s00381-021-05090-2 ↗
12. 10.1002/cncr.2656410.1002/cncr.26564 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.05210.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.052 ↗
14. 10.1186/1477-7819-11-27410.1186/1477-7819-11-274 ↗
15. 10.21037/qims-21-79210.21037/qims-21-792 ↗
16. 10.7759/cureus.271610.7759/cureus.2716 ↗
17. 10.3171/2015.11.JNS1599110.3171/2015.11.JNS15991 ↗
18. 10.3171/2019.10.FocusVid.1940510.3171/2019.10.FocusVid.19405 ↗
19. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91175-T10.1016/0140-6736(91)91175-T ↗
20. 10.1111/ner.1269810.1111/ner.12698 ↗
21. Osenbach R. K. · Neurosurgery · 2003 · 53 · 50410.1227/01.neu.0000309357.22417.79 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.03010.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10492410.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104924 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8SM01747F10.1039/C8SM01747F ↗
25. 10.1038/srep2156910.1038/srep21569 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-017-13727-z10.1038/s41598-017-13727-z ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10557510.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105575 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.02910.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.029 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00586-011-1822-610.1007/s00586-011-1822-6 ↗
30. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd575810.1126/scitranslmed.abd5758 ↗
31. 10.1089/neu.2016.456710.1089/neu.2016.4567 ↗
32. 10.1002/path.465410.1002/path.4654 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.03810.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.038 ↗
34. 10.1179/09506605979042174610.1179/095066059790421746 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.03210.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.032 ↗
36. 10.4103/1673-5374.31301710.4103/1673-5374.313017 ↗
37. 10.1111/ner.1272110.1111/ner.12721 ↗
38. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000368153.44883.B310.1227/01.NEU.0000368153.44883.B3 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0045610.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00456 ↗
40. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
41. 10.1016/0021-9290(72)90010-310.1016/0021-9290(72)90010-3 ↗
42. 10.1115/1.364402010.1115/1.3644020 ↗
43. 10.1039/D1SM01401C10.1039/D1SM01401C ↗
44. 10.3389/fncel.2015.0025710.3389/fncel.2015.00257 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.04010.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.040 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.01710.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.017 ↗
47. Menard K. P. · 200810.1201/9781420053135 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10286-014-0256-810.1007/s10286-014-0256-8 ↗
49. 10.1115/1.400449410.1115/1.4004494 ↗
50. 10.1007/s00414-022-02909-810.1007/s00414-022-02909-8 ↗
51. 10.1073/pnas.120015110910.1073/pnas.1200151109 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.03810.1016/j.cell.2013.12.038 ↗
53. 10.1038/nature0961410.1038/nature09614 ↗
54. 10.1002/pat.303810.1002/pat.3038 ↗
55. 10.1038/nrn355010.1038/nrn3550 ↗
56. 10.1074/jbc.M60687020010.1074/jbc.M606870200 ↗
57. 10.1097/00005537-199906000-0000110.1097/00005537-199906000-00001 ↗
58. 10.1038/nrm.2015.1410.1038/nrm.2015.14 ↗
59. 10.1080/23746149.2022.215362410.1080/23746149.2022.2153624 ↗