journal article·2026-04-13Open access

Effects of Intracellular Force Localization on Cancer Cell Invasion: Revealing Mechanical Trade-offs through Experimentally Validated Computational Models

Amir Shaghoury, Sapir Dadon, Daphne Weihs

Abstract

Metastasis, leading to 90% of cancer-related deaths, is driven by invasive forces exerted by cancer cells on their microenvironment. While actin is central to force generation and motility, the effects of intracellular force-localization during invasion remain largely unexplored. We previously demonstrated, in a clinically relevant assay, invasive cancer cells indenting soft, elastic gels to cell-scale depths, and developed corresponding experimentally validated finite element models. Here, we applied those models to investigate how the force-application location, above (top) or below (bottom) the nucleus, affects invasion efficiency. Under low force-levels (≤100 nN), top-applied forces produce 35-42% deeper indentations than bottom-applied forces, with modest increases in intracellular stress, indicating potentially increased invasiveness. However, with top-applied forces, ∼10% less stress is transmitted to the gel, suggesting less effective microenvironmental mechanical interaction. In contrast, under higher forces (≥150 nN), bottom-applied forces become more effective, transmitting >15% more stress to the gel, with indentation depths becoming comparable between top- and bottom-applied configurations, and significantly (>250%) less nuclear stress generated, thereby supporting invasion. These trends are particularly evident when the cytoplasm is softer than the nucleus, as is typical of (invasive cancer) cells. Thus, top-applied forces may support shallow invasion into soft environments, whereas bottom-applied forces mimicking actin-rich, stiff, leading-edge protrusions, optimize deep, forceful invasion with reduced cell-integrity risk. We demonstrate that intracellular force-localization critically influences the mechanical trade-offs between invasion efficiency and cellular stability, potentially offering targets for antimetastatic strategies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cell Adhesion Molecules Research · Microtubule and mitosis dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Biomedical Engineering

Technion − Israel Institute of Technology

Department of Mathematics and Statistics and the Data Science Institute, Faculty of Science

Hasselt University

Funding

Gerald O. Mann Charitable Foundation · Ministry of Innovation, Science and Technology · Applebaum Foundation · Frank and Dolores Corbett Charitable Foundations

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12013-012-9356-z10.1007/s12013-012-9356-z ↗
2. 10.1529/biophysj.104.04547610.1529/biophysj.104.045476 ↗
3. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/38/38400310.1088/0957-4484/19/38/384003 ↗
4. 10.1039/C2LC41117B10.1039/C2LC41117B ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.00210.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.002 ↗
6. 10.1371/journal.pone.003347610.1371/journal.pone.0033476 ↗
7. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/03502210.1088/1367-2630/15/3/035022 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.00310.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.003 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.a.3759710.1002/jbm.a.37597 ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.18910.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.189 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-210.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
12. 10.1371/journal.pone.003257210.1371/journal.pone.0032572 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10237-016-0864-410.1007/s10237-016-0864-4 ↗
14. 10.1039/C7NR02940C10.1039/C7NR02940C ↗
15. 10.1039/c1sm05532a10.1039/c1sm05532a ↗
16. 10.1007/s10439-020-02547-410.1007/s10439-020-02547-4 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10439-020-02720-910.1007/s10439-020-02720-9 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10237-021-01475-z10.1007/s10237-021-01475-z ↗
19. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/4/04301010.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043010 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10439-020-02679-710.1007/s10439-020-02679-7 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.117586210.1126/science.1175862 ↗
22. 10.1152/physrev.00021.200710.1152/physrev.00021.2007 ↗
23. 10.1529/biophysj.106.08110910.1529/biophysj.106.081109 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.04810.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.048 ↗
25. 10.1016/B978-0-12-812952-4.00015-510.1016/B978-0-12-812952-4.00015-5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.05.01410.1016/j.medengphy.2016.05.014 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11517-021-02318-w10.1007/s11517-021-02318-w ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.a.3667010.1002/jbm.a.36670 ↗
29. 10.1088/2057-1739/aa8c0b10.1088/2057-1739/aa8c0b ↗
30. 10.1007/s10237-018-1036-510.1007/s10237-018-1036-5 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.111891010910.1073/pnas.1118910109 ↗
32. 10.1083/jcb.20050912410.1083/jcb.200509124 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.03010.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.030 ↗
34. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.15192710.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151927 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.01110.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.011 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.11040010.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110400 ↗
37. 10.1002/cphy.c10003810.1002/cphy.c100038 ↗
38. 10.1242/jcs.20962710.1242/jcs.209627 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.06.00310.1016/j.tcb.2018.06.003 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.11.00910.1016/j.tcb.2020.11.009 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10439-017-1814-810.1007/s10439-017-1814-8 ↗
42. 10.1007/s12195-009-0052-z10.1007/s12195-009-0052-z ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.00610.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.006 ↗
44. M. R., King Principles of cellular engineering: understanding the biomolecular interface ; Elsevier Academic Press, 2006; p 314.
45. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.116288010.3389/fbioe.2023.1162880 ↗
46. 10.1063/5.007165210.1063/5.0071652 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.04010.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.040 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00201-910.1016/S0021-9290(01)00201-9 ↗
49. 10.1089/ten.tec.2016.042410.1089/ten.tec.2016.0424 ↗
50. 10.3233/BIR-2009-054010.3233/BIR-2009-0540 ↗
51. 10.1007/978-3-319-95294-9_1510.1007/978-3-319-95294-9_15 ↗
52. 10.1007/BF0234596410.1007/BF02345964 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.00410.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.004 ↗
54. 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.052010.1089/ten.teb.2010.0520 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10237-021-01441-910.1007/s10237-021-01441-9 ↗
56. 10.1039/C5IB00056D10.1039/C5IB00056D ↗
57. 10.1115/1.400569410.1115/1.4005694 ↗
58. 10.1002/ijc.3322910.1002/ijc.33229 ↗
59. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-101210.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1012 ↗
60. 10.1007/s12013-011-9244-y10.1007/s12013-011-9244-y ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.02090310.1103/PhysRevE.81.020903 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.044 ↗
63. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-103122-03113010.1146/annurev-bioeng-103122-031130 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.10245610.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102456 ↗
65. 10.1091/mbc.E18-09-060410.1091/mbc.E18-09-0604 ↗
66. 10.1007/s12195-009-0082-610.1007/s12195-009-0082-6 ↗
67. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.24810310.1103/PhysRevLett.105.248103 ↗
68. 10.1039/c3sm50172h10.1039/c3sm50172h ↗
69. 10.1091/mbc.E19-10-058810.1091/mbc.E19-10-0588 ↗
70. 10.1083/jcb.20130802910.1083/jcb.201308029 ↗
71. 10.1101/cshperspect.a01826710.1101/cshperspect.a018267 ↗
72. 10.20517/evcna.2024.4710.20517/evcna.2024.47 ↗
73. 10.1038/s41467-021-24383-310.1038/s41467-021-24383-3 ↗
74. 10.1073/pnas.201934711810.1073/pnas.2019347118 ↗
75. 10.1017/qrd.2024.2810.1017/qrd.2024.28 ↗