journal article·2026-01-12

Harnessing Starch for Next-Generation Corneal Tissue Engineering

Amin Orash Mahmoudsalehi, Kevin Stalin Catzim Rios, Wendy Ortega-Lara, Narsimha Mamidi

Publisher page

Abstract

Corneal transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage corneal disease. However, its clinical use is limited by the global shortage of donor tissue, risks of immune rejection, and postoperative complications. Corneal tissue engineering (CTE) has emerged as a promising alternative strategy, focusing on the development of biocompatible scaffolds that support cellular regeneration while maintaining the critical optical clarity and biomechanical properties of the native cornea. Starch (ST), a naturally derived and abundant polysaccharide, has garnered significant interest as a biomaterial for this application due to its inherent biocompatibility, tunable biodegradability, and amenability to chemical modification. Its physicochemical properties, including controllable hydration, intrinsic optical transparency, and modifiable mechanical strength, are highly conducive to corneal scaffold design. ST can be processed via various techniques such as hydrogel formation, electrospinning, and three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, to generate structures tailored for specific corneal repair applications. Recent advances focus on functionalizing ST-based scaffolds with bioactive molecules to enhance cellular adhesion and proliferation, improve biomechanical performance, and better recapitulate the native corneal extracellular matrix (ECM). Moreover, ST offers considerable economic and environmental advantages over synthetic polymers due to its cost-effectiveness and sustainable sourcing. Notwithstanding its potential, key challenges persist in optimizing its long-term mechanical stability, controlling its degradation profile to match tissue ingrowth, and ensuring seamless biointegration with host corneal cells. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the fabrication methodologies, structure–property relationships, and in vitro and in vivo performance of ST-based biomaterials in the context of CTE. Given its versatility and favorable characteristics, ST represents a highly promising substrate for advancing next-generation corneal regenerative therapies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corneal Surgery and Treatments · Wound Healing and Treatments · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Nanotechnology, School of Engineering and Science

Tecnologico de Monterrey

Wisconsin Center for NanoBioSystmes, School of Pharmacy

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías · Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41587-022-01408-w10.1038/s41587-022-01408-w ↗
2. 10.1039/D1BM02023D10.1039/D1BM02023D ↗
3. 10.1038/s41598-021-82678-310.1038/s41598-021-82678-3 ↗
4. 10.1088/1748-605X/ac4d7b10.1088/1748-605X/ac4d7b ↗
5. Mahmoudsalehi A. O. · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2022 · 28 · 600
6. 10.2147/IJN.S7770610.2147/IJN.S77706 ↗
7. 10.3390/nano802012410.3390/nano8020124 ↗
8. Akter F. · 2016
9. 10.1002/adfm.20190899610.1002/adfm.201908996 ↗
10. 10.3390/nano1313197610.3390/nano13131976 ↗
11. 10.17219/pim/12765310.17219/pim/127653 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41578-020-0204-210.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
13. 10.3390/ijms2203129110.3390/ijms22031291 ↗
14. 10.2217/rme-2019-005510.2217/rme-2019-0055 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11315310.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113153 ↗
16. 10.1002/adhm.20170143410.1002/adhm.201701434 ↗
17. 10.1039/D4NR05298F10.1039/D4NR05298F ↗
18. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.11181910.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111819 ↗
19. 10.1002/adhm.20240119510.1002/adhm.202401195 ↗
20. Roslan, M. R.; Nasir, N. M.; Cheng, E. M.; Amin, N. A. M. In Tissue Engineering Scaffold Based on Starch: A Review , International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT); IEEE, 2016.10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7755010 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00008-510.1016/S0928-4931(02)00008-5 ↗
22. 10.3390/polym1417355610.3390/polym14173556 ↗
23. Rodríguez C. E. C. · Inves. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 2020 · 61 · 1201
24. Parra M. D. M. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 2019 · 60 · 4119
25. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.017 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41587-022-01408-w10.1038/s41587-022-01408-w ↗
27. 10.1002/mame.20130018710.1002/mame.201300187 ↗
28. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.056810.1089/ten.tea.2010.0568 ↗
29. 10.21037/aes.2018.01.0110.21037/aes.2018.01.01 ↗
30. 10.1080/09205063.2016.116056110.1080/09205063.2016.1160561 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.03310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.033 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11224210.1016/j.msec.2021.112242 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.017 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.018 ↗
36. 10.1167/iovs.07-159910.1167/iovs.07-1599 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.01110.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.011 ↗
38. Xu Y. G. · Mol. Vis. · 2008 · 14 · 2180
39. 10.1007/s00441-007-0419-110.1007/s00441-007-0419-1 ↗
40. 10.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00067-710.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00067-7 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.exer.2022.10902710.1016/j.exer.2022.109027 ↗
42. 10.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00067-710.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00067-7 ↗
43. 10.1002/adhm.20210097210.1002/adhm.202100972 ↗
44. 10.1002/jcp.3008510.1002/jcp.30085 ↗
45. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1412279710.3390/pharmaceutics14122797 ↗
46. 10.3390/polym1411221510.3390/polym14112215 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0019510.1021/acs.biomac.7b00195 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.05.01710.1016/j.tifs.2021.05.017 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.13810.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.138 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13605810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136058 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12062710.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120627 ↗
52. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822351-2.00023-110.1016/B978-0-12-822351-2.00023-1 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10853-013-7536-x10.1007/s10853-013-7536-x ↗
54. 10.1080/09205063.2015.103758710.1080/09205063.2015.1037587 ↗
55. 10.1088/1748-605X/aa891010.1088/1748-605X/aa8910 ↗
56. 10.1088/2057-1976/aad74a10.1088/2057-1976/aad74a ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.07910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.079 ↗
58. 10.1002/star.20220002510.1002/star.202200025 ↗
59. 10.1002/pen.2624510.1002/pen.26245 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.07810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.078 ↗
61. 10.1002/term.13210.1002/term.132 ↗
62. 10.1155/2016/960531210.1155/2016/9605312 ↗
63. 10.1007/s10965-018-1651-y10.1007/s10965-018-1651-y ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.12.01610.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.12.016 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.13810.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.138 ↗
66. 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61305-310.1016/S2095-3119(15)61305-3 ↗
67. 10.1002/bip.1975.36014090910.1002/bip.1975.360140909 ↗
68. 10.1016/S0141-8130(98)00040-310.1016/S0141-8130(98)00040-3 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.04610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.046 ↗
70. 10.1002/fsn3.3710.1002/fsn3.37 ↗
71. 10.1007/s11581-019-03123-010.1007/s11581-019-03123-0 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.09510.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.095 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.06410.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.064 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12624010.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126240 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.01810.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.018 ↗
76. 10.1021/jf011652p10.1021/jf011652p ↗
77. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.01710.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.017 ↗
78. Wang H. · Iran. Polym. J. · 2011 · 20 · 551
79. Taherkhani, S.; Moztarzadeh, F.Fabrication of a poly (ε-caprolactone)/starch nanocomposite scaffold with a solvent-casting/salt-leaching technique for bone tissue engineering applications J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016; Vol. 133 10.1002/app.43523.10.1002/app.43523 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10081710.1016/j.addma.2019.100817 ↗
81. 10.1088/2057-1976/aad74a10.1088/2057-1976/aad74a ↗
82. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.07510.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.075 ↗
83. 10.1002/app.1319410.1002/app.13194 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.10.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2007.10.015 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.07110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.071 ↗
86. 10.3390/polym1201000710.3390/polym12010007 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.10014810.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100148 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.msec.2009.10.00610.1016/j.msec.2009.10.006 ↗
89. 10.1002/jbm.a.3776910.1002/jbm.a.37769 ↗
90. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.75930310.3389/fbioe.2021.759303 ↗
91. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-30545010.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305450 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10487310.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104873 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.10365110.1016/j.jddst.2022.103651 ↗
94. 10.1002/jbm.a.3776910.1002/jbm.a.37769 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.01210.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.012 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.10014810.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100148 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.04510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.045 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.21284010.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212840 ↗
99. 10.1007/s42235-024-00520-810.1007/s42235-024-00520-8 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10240210.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102402 ↗