Cholesterol removal via cyclodextrin-decoration on cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)-grafted poly(HEMA-GMA) nanocomposite adsorbent
Source abstract
Abstract
Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was grafted to cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) using hydroquinone resulting in a crosslinkable nanoparticle. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) was used to polymerize this nanoparticle to obtain a polymeric structure with a bridging CNC structure to which cyclodextrin (CD) was attached in order to better capture hydrophobic biomolecules. X-Ray Microscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance methods provided the main characterization data proving the successful modification process. This CD-modified nanocomposite adsorbent was used for the removal of cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein for the first time. Adsorption performance in a continuous system was ~ 99% for both cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein with agreement between experimental data and mathematical models performed. Overall, results indicate that cyclodextrin modified poly(HEMA-GMA-g-CNC) is a promising material for use as an adsorbent for biological and biomedical applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Aguado S, Canivet J, Farrusseng D (2011) Engineering structured MOF at nano and macroscales for catalysis and separation. J Mater Chem 21:7582–7588. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm10787a10.1039/c1jm10787a ↗
2. Aşir S, Uzun L, Türkmen D, Say R, Denizli A (2005) Ion-selective imprinted superporous monolith for cadmium removal from human plasma Separ. Sci Technol 40:3167–3185. https://doi.org/10.1080/0149639050038537610.1080/01496390500385376 ↗
3. Ben Azouz K, Ramires EC, Van den Fonteyne W, El Kissi N, Dufresne A (2012) Simple method for the melt extrusion of a cellulose nanocrystal reinforced hydrophobic polymer. ACS Macro Lett 1:236–240. https://doi.org/10.1021/mz200173710.1021/mz2001737 ↗
4. Bénard P, Chahine R (2008) 10—Carbon nanostructures for hydrogen storage. In: Walker G (ed) Solid-state hydrogen storage. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845694944.3.26110.1533/9781845694944.3.261 ↗
5. Bennett AE, Rienstra CM, Auger M, Lakshmi K, Griffin RG (1995) Heteronuclear decoupling in rotating solids. J Chem Phys 103:6951–695810.1063/1.470372 ↗
6. Bereli N, Şener G, Yavuz H, Denizli A (2011) Oriented immobilized anti-LDL antibody carrying poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) cryogel for cholesterol removal from human plasma. Mater Sci Eng, C 31:1078–108310.1016/j.msec.2011.03.008 ↗
7. Bourret GR, Goulet PJG, Lennox RB (2011) Synthesis of porous metallic monoliths via chemical reduction of Au(I) and Ag(I) nanostructured sheets. Chem Mater 23:4954–4959. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm202049810.1021/cm2020498 ↗
8. Breuer H (2005) Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary heart disease—lower is better. Eur Cardiol 1(1):1–6
9. Bulgariu L et al (2019) The utilization of leaf-based adsorbents for dyes removal: a review. J Mol Liq 276:728–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.12.00110.1016/j.molliq.2018.12.001 ↗
10. Couck S et al (2017) CO2, CH4 and N2 separation with a 3DFD-printed ZSM-5 monolith. Chem Eng J 308:719–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.04610.1016/j.cej.2016.09.046 ↗
11. Deng F, Luo X-B, Ding L, Luo S-L (2019) 5—Application of nanomaterials and nanotechnology in the reutilization of metal ion from wastewater. In: Luo X, Deng F (eds) Nanomaterials for the removal of pollutants and resource reutilization. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814837-2.00005-610.1016/B978-0-12-814837-2.00005-6 ↗
12. Dixon W, Schaefer J, Sefcik M, Stejskal E, McKay R (1982) Total suppression of sidebands in CPMAS C-13 NMR. J Magn Reson 49:341–345
13. Eeltink S, Herrero-Martinez JM, Rozing GP, Schoenmakers PJ, Kok WT (2005) Tailoring the morphology of methacrylate ester-based monoliths for optimum efficiency in liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 77:7342–7347. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac051093b10.1021/ac051093b ↗
14. Garcia-Valdez O, Champagne-Hartley R, Saldivar-Guerra E, Champagne P, Cunningham M (2015) Modification of chitosan with polystyrene and poly (n-butyl acrylate) via nitroxide-mediated polymerization and grafting from approach in homogeneous media. Polym Chem 6:2827–283610.1039/C5PY00028A ↗
15. Gepner Y et al (2019) The beneficial effects of Mediterranean diet over low-fat diet may be mediated by decreasing hepatic fat content. J Hepatol 71:379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.01310.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.013 ↗
16. Glasser WG (1999) Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry Edited by D. Klemm, (University of Jena), B. Philipp (Max Planck Institute Teltow-Seehof), T. Heinze (University of Jena), U. Heinze (University of Jena), and W. Wagenknecht (Max Planck Institute Teltow-Seehof). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1998. Volume 1, xxii + 260 pp. 16.5 × 24 cm. $170.00. ISBN 3-527-29413-9. Volume 2, xvi + 390 pp. 16.5 × 24 cm. $188.00. ISBN 3-527-29489-9. J Nat Prod 62:800–800.https://doi.org/10.1021/np980254m10.1021/np980254m ↗
17. Gupta NK, Choudhary BC, Gupta A, Achary SN, Sengupta A (2019) Graphene-based adsorbents for the separation of f-metals from waste solutions: a review. J Mol Liq 289:111121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11112110.1016/j.molliq.2019.111121 ↗
18. Gusain R, Kumar N, Ray SS (2020) Recent advances in carbon nanomaterial-based adsorbents for water purification. Coord Chem Rev 405:213111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.21311110.1016/j.ccr.2019.213111 ↗
19. Heinecke JW (2006) Lipoprotein oxidation in cardiovascular disease: chief culprit or innocent bystander? J Exp Med 203:813–816. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.2006021810.1084/jem.20060218 ↗
20. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 91:156–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.00810.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008 ↗
21. Huff T, Jialal I (2018) Physiology, cholesterol. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing
22. Inanan T, Tüzmen N, Akgöl S, Denizli A (2016) Selective cholesterol adsorption by molecular imprinted polymeric nanospheres and application to GIMS. Int J Biol Macromol 92:451–46010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.007 ↗
23. Izquierdo-Barba I, Vallet-Regí M, Kupferschmidt N, Terasaki O, Schmidtchen A, Malmsten M (2009) Incorporation of antimicrobial compounds in mesoporous silica film monolith. Biomaterials 30:5729–5736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.003 ↗
24. Jandera P, Komers D (1997) Fitting competitive adsorption isotherms to the experimental distribution data in reversed-phase systems. J Chromatogr A 762:3–1310.1016/S0021-9673(96)00853-9 ↗
25. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Mathew AP, Oksman K (2010) Mechanical properties of cellulose nanofiber (CNF) reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) prepared by twin screw extrusion. Compos Sci Technol 70:1742–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.005 ↗
26. Kalburcu T, Öztürk N, Tüzmen N, Akgöl S, Denizli A (2014) Cholesterol removal onto the different hydrophobic nanospheres: a comparison study. J Ind Eng Chem 20:153–15910.1016/j.jiec.2013.04.013 ↗
27. Khalil HA, Bhat A, Yusra AI (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–97910.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078 ↗
28. Köse K, Akveran GA, Erol K, Köse DA (2018) Nicotinamide-modified poly (HEMA-GMA)-Nic cryogels for removal of pesticides. J Turk Chem Soc Sect A&58 Chem 5:941–95210.18596/jotcsa.394592 ↗
29. Köse K, Mavlan M, Nuruddin M, Youngblood JP (2020a) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber based polymeric adsorbent for use in iron removal. Cellulose 27:4623–4635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03104-x10.1007/s10570-020-03104-x ↗
30. Köse K, Mavlan M, Youngblood JP (2020b) Applications and impact of nanocellulose based adsorbents. Cellulose 27:2967–2990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03011-110.1007/s10570-020-03011-1 ↗
31. Larsen T (2012) Enzymatic-fluorometric quantification of cholesterol in bovine milk. Food Chem 135:1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.06110.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.061 ↗
32. Lazaro I et al (2019) Walnut inclusion in a palm-based high-fat and high-cholesterol diet without changing total energy supply stabilises advanced atheroma plaque through an anti-inflammatory mechanism in apoe-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 287:e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.06.14010.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.06.140 ↗
33. Lee D, Ahn J, Kwak H (1999) Cholesterol removal from homogenized milk with β-cyclodextrin. J Dairy Sci 82:2327–233010.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75481-0 ↗
34. Linton MF et al (2019) The role of lipids and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A et al (eds) Endotext [Internet]. MDText.com Inc, South Dartmouth (MA), p 2000
35. Liu Y, Zheng Y, Wang A (2010) Response surface methodology for optimizing adsorption process parameters for methylene blue removal by a hydrogel composite. Adsorpt Sci Technol 28:913–922. https://doi.org/10.1260/0263-6174.28.10.91310.1260/0263-6174.28.10.913 ↗
36. Liu Y, Ren L, Liu Z (2011) A unique boronic acid functionalized monolithic capillary for specific capture, separation and immobilization of cis-diol biomolecules. Chem Commun 47:5067–5069. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc05675h10.1039/c0cc05675h ↗
37. Madill EA, Garcia-Valdez O, Champagne P, Cunningham MF (2017) CO2-responsive graft modified chitosan for heavy metal (nickel) recovery. Polymers 9:39410.3390/polym9090394 ↗
38. Marczewski AW (2010) Analysis of kinetic Langmuir model. Part I: integrated kinetic Langmuir equation (IKL): a new complete analytical solution of the Langmuir rate equation. Langmuir 26:15229–1523810.1021/la1010049 ↗
39. Marczewski AW, Deryło-Marczewska A, Słota A (2013) Adsorption and desorption kinetics of benzene derivatives on mesoporous carbons. Adsorption 19:391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-012-9462-710.1007/s10450-012-9462-7 ↗
40. Miao C, Hamad WY (2013) Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: a critical review. Cellulose 20:2221–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0007-310.1007/s10570-013-0007-3 ↗
41. Mittal A, Teotia M, Soni RK, Mittal J (2016) Applications of egg shell and egg shell membrane as adsorbents: a review. J Mol Liq 223:376–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.08.06510.1016/j.molliq.2016.08.065 ↗
42. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
43. Mosca A, Hedlund J, Webley PA, Grahn M, Rezaei F (2010) Structured zeolite NaX coatings on ceramic cordierite monolith supports for PSA applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 130:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.10.01010.1016/j.micromeso.2009.10.010 ↗
44. Mourabet M, El Rhilassi A, El Boujaady H, Bennani-Ziatni M, Taitai A (2017) Use of response surface methodology for optimization of fluoride adsorption in an aqueous solution by Brushite. Arab J Chem 10:S3292–S3302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.02810.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.028 ↗
45. Nasiri M, Ahmadzadeh H, Amiri A (2019) Sample preparation and extraction methods for pesticides in aquatic environments: a review. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.11577210.1016/j.trac.2019.115772 ↗
46. Ncube S, Madikizela L, Cukrowska E, Chimuka L (2018) Recent advances in the adsorbents for isolation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from environmental sample solutions. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 99:101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.12.00710.1016/j.trac.2017.12.007 ↗
47. Nordborg A, Hilder EF, Haddad PR (2011) Monolithic phases for ion chromatography. Annu Rev Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-061010-11392910.1146/annurev-anchem-061010-113929 ↗
48. O’Connell DW, Birkinshaw C, O’Dwyer TF (2008) Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: a review. Biores Technol 99:6709–6724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.03610.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.036 ↗
49. Page IH, Stare FJ, Corcoran A, Pollack H, Wilkinson CF Jr (1957) Atherosclerosis and the fat content of the diet. Circulation 16:163–17810.1161/01.CIR.16.2.163 ↗
50. Panella B, Hirscher M (2010) Physisorption in porous materials. In: Handbook of hydrogen storage: new materials for future energy storage, pp 39–6210.1002/9783527629800.ch2 ↗
51. Pereda M, Kissi NE, Dufresne A (2014) Extrusion of polysaccharide nanocrystal reinforced polymer nanocomposites through compatibilization with poly(ethylene oxide). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9365–9375. https://doi.org/10.1021/am501755p10.1021/am501755p ↗
52. Peters B (2017) Chapter 6—Collision theory. In: Peters B (ed) Reaction rate theory and rare events simulations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-456349-1.00006-410.1016/B978-0-44-456349-1.00006-4 ↗
53. Peters EC, Petro M, Svec F, Fréchet JMJ (1997) Molded rigid polymer monoliths as separation media for capillary electrochromatography. Anal Chem 69:3646–364910.1021/ac970377w ↗
54. Rabe M, Verdes D, Seeger S (2011) Understanding protein adsorption phenomena at solid surfaces. Adv Coll Interface Sci 162:87–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.00710.1016/j.cis.2010.12.007 ↗
55. Rezaei F, Mosca A, Webley P, Hedlund J, Xiao P (2010) Comparison of traditional and structured adsorbents for CO2 separation by vacuum-swing adsorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:4832–4841. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie901654510.1021/ie9016545 ↗
56. Sachse A, Hulea V, Finiels A, Coq B, Fajula F, Galarneau A (2012) Alumina-grafted macro-/mesoporous silica monoliths as continuous flow microreactors for the Diels–Alder reaction. J Catal 287:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.12.00310.1016/j.jcat.2011.12.003 ↗
57. Salehi E, Afshar S, Mehrizi MZ, Chehrei A, Asadi M (2018) Direct reduction of blood serum cholesterol using Thymus vulgaris L.: preliminary biosorption study. Process Biochem 67:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.01.02310.1016/j.procbio.2018.01.023 ↗
58. Sengupta S, Koley H, Dutta S, Bhowal J (2019) Hepatoprotective effects of synbiotic soy yogurt on mice fed a high-cholesterol diet. Nutrition 63–64:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2019.01.00910.1016/j.nut.2019.01.009 ↗
59. Svec F, Lv Y (2015) Advances and recent trends in the field of monolithic columns for chromatography. Anal Chem 87:250–273. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac504059c10.1021/ac504059c ↗
60. Tao S, Wang Y, An Y (2011) Superwetting monolithic SiO2 with hierarchical structure for oil removal. J Mater Chem 21:11901–11907. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12141c10.1039/c1jm12141c ↗
61. Tsoupras A, Lordan R, Zabetakis I (2018) Inflammation, not cholesterol, is a cause of chronic disease. Nutrients 10:604. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu1005060410.3390/nu10050604 ↗
62. Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW (1990) Peripheral blood smear–clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. Butterworths, London
63. Wan Ngah WS, Hanafiah MAKM (2008) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:3935–3948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.01110.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.011 ↗
64. Wang T et al (2018) Adsorption of agricultural wastewater contaminated with antibiotics, pesticides and toxic metals by functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. J Environ Chem Eng 6:6468–6478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.01410.1016/j.jece.2018.10.014 ↗
65. Worsley MA, Stadermann M, Wang YM, Satcher JH Jr, Baumann TF (2010) High surface area carbon aerogels as porous substrates for direct growth of carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun 46:9253–9255. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc03457f10.1039/c0cc03457f ↗
66. Xin Y, Xiong Q, Bai Q, Miyamoto M, Li C, Shen Y, Uyama H (2017) A hierarchically porous cellulose monolith: a template-free fabricated, morphology-tunable, and easily functionalizable platform. Carbohydr Polym 157:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.006 ↗
67. Xu W, Hussain A, Liu Y (2018) A review on modification methods of adsorbents for elemental mercury from flue gas. Chem Eng J 346:692–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.04910.1016/j.cej.2018.03.049 ↗
68. Yavuz H, Karakoç V, Türkmen D, Say R, Denizli A (2007) Synthesis of cholesterol imprinted polymeric particles. Int J Biol Macromol 41:8–1510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.11.011 ↗
69. Zhang J, Zhou Q, Ou L (2012) Kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic studies of the adsorption of methyl orange from aqueous solution by chitosan/alumina composite. J Chem Eng Data 57:412–419. https://doi.org/10.1021/je200994510.1021/je2009945 ↗
70. Zhao X et al (2014) A novel mixed phospholipid functionalized monolithic column for early screening of drug induced phospholipidosis risk. J Chromatogr A 1367:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.09.04810.1016/j.chroma.2014.09.048 ↗