journal article·2017-03

The impact of antibiotics on bacterial cellulose in vivo

Alyssa L. Henning, Jeffrey M. Catchmark

Cellulose· Volume 24· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigated how antibiotics, to which Gluconacetobacter hansenii is naturally resistant, impact cellulose crystallinity, allomorph, aggregation into bundles and layers, cellulose yield, and cell morphology. G. hansenii was exposed to 100 μg/mL ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and kanamycin for 7 days, and cellulose structure was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biomass and cellulose weights were also assessed. Ampicillin increased bundle thickness, and the bundles also showed nodular deposits indicative of non-cellulosic exopolysaccharide deposition. Ampicillin also yielded the lowest amount of cellulose per gram of biomass (p < 0.01) and induced significant filamentation behavior. Chloramphenicol inhibited biomass production (p < 0.01), increased the I-α allomorph content (p < 0.01), and also induced filamentation, though not as profusely as ampicillin. We hypothesize that defects in the peptidoglycan layer and in protein production lowered cellulose yield and promoted cells to undergo filamentation as a survival tactic. Additionally, we hypothesize that antibiotic stress caused additional exopolysaccharides to be produced and that they likely enhanced glucan chain aggregation into higher-order structures. Our findings have significant implications for downstream applications such as genetically engineering G. hansenii to produce bacterial cellulose with modified properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls · Biofuel production and bioconversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdel-Sayed S (1987) Transport of chloramphenicol into sensitive strains of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 19:7–20. doi: 10.1093/jac/19.1.710.1093/jac/19.1.7 ↗
2. Abe K, Sugiyama J, Itoh T, Ishihara M, Yamanaka S (1998) Crystalline features of bacterial cellulose altered by chemical agents during biosynthesis. Wood Res Bull Wood Res Inst Kyoto Univ 85:66–67
3. Battad-Bernardo E, McCrindle SL, Couperwhite I, Neilan BA (2004) Insertion of an E. coli lacZ gene in Acetobacter xylinus for the production of cellulose in whey. FEMS Microbiol Lett 231:253–260. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(04)00007-210.1016/S0378-1097(04)00007-2 ↗
4. Benveniste R, Davies J (1973) Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 42:471–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.42.070173.00235110.1146/annurev.bi.42.070173.002351 ↗
5. Benziman M, Haigler CH, Brown RM, White AR, Cooper KM (1980) Cellulose biogenesis: polymerization and crystallization are coupled processes in Acetobacter xylinum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:6678–668210.1073/pnas.77.11.6678 ↗
6. Blattner FR, Plunkett G 3rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, Gregor J, Davis NW, Kirkpatrick HA, Goeden MA, Rose DJ, Mau B, Shao Y (1997) The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453–146210.1126/science.277.5331.1453 ↗
7. Bos J, Zhang Q, Vyawahare S, Rogers E, Rosenberg SM, Austin RH (2015) Emergence of antibiotic resistance from multinucleated bacterial filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:178–183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142070211110.1073/pnas.1420702111 ↗
8. Brown MR (1996) The biosynthesis of cellulose. J Pure Appl Chem 33:1345–1373
9. Chen K, Sun GW, Chua KL, Gan Y (2005) Modified virulence of antibiotic-induced Burkholderia pseudomallei filaments. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1002–1009. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1002-1009.200510.1128/AAC.49.3.1002-1009.2005 ↗
10. Cold Spring Harbor (2006) LB (Luria-Bertani) liquid medium. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. doi: 10.1101/pdb.rec814110.1101/pdb.rec8141 ↗
11. Crosby HA, Bion JF, Penns CW, Elliott TSJ (2016) Antibiotic-induced release of endotoxin from bacteria in vitro. J Med Microbiol 40:23–3010.1099/00222615-40-1-23 ↗
12. de Pedro MA, Höltje JV, Schwarz H (2002) Fast lysis of Escherichia coli filament cells requires differentiation of potential division sites. Microbiology 148:79–8610.1099/00221287-148-1-79 ↗
13. Deng Y, Nagachar N, Xiao C, Tien M, Kao TH (2013) Identification and characterization of non-cellulose-producing mutants of Gluconacetobacter hansenii generated by Tn5 transposon mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 195:5072–5083. doi: 10.1128/JB.00767-1310.1128/JB.00767-13 ↗
14. Deng Y, Nagachar N, Fang L, Luan X, Catchmark JM, Tien M, Kao TH (2015) Isolation and characterization of two cellulose morphology mutants of Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC23769 producing cellulose with lower crystallinity. PLoS ONE 10:1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.011950410.1371/journal.pone.0119504 ↗
15. Doi Y, Arakawa Y (2007) 16S Ribosomal RNA methylation: emerging resistance mechanism against aminoglycosides. Clin Infect Dis 45:88–94. doi: 10.1086/51860510.1086/518605 ↗
16. Dong H, Strawhecker KE, Snyder JF et al (2012) Cellulose nanocrystals as a reinforcing material for electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate) fibers: formation, properties and nanomechanical characterization. Carbohydr Polym 87:2488–2495. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.015 ↗
17. Ehrlich J, Bartz QR, Smith RM, Joslyn DA, Burkholder PR (1947) Chloromycetin, a new antibiotic from a soil actinomycete. Science 106:417. doi: 10.1126/science.106.2757.41710.1126/science.106.2757.417 ↗
18. Fang L, Catchmark J (2014) Characterization of water-soluble exopolysaccharides from Gluconacetobacter xylinus and their impacts on bacterial cellulose formation. Biomacromolecules. doi: 10.1007/s10570-014-0443-810.1007/s10570-014-0443-8 ↗
19. Fang L, Catchmark JM (2015) Characterization of cellulose and other exopolysaccharides produced from Gluconacetobacter strains. Carbohydr Polym 115:663–669. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.02810.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.028 ↗
20. Fernández M, Conde S, de la Torre J, Molina-Santiago C, Ramos JL, Duque E (2012) Mechanisms of resistance to chloramphenicol in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1001–1009. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05398-1110.1128/AAC.05398-11 ↗
21. Florea M, Reeve B, Abbott J, Freemont PS, Ellis T (2016) Genome sequence and plasmid transformation of the model high-yield bacterial cellulose producer Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 53582. Sci Rep 6:23635. doi: 10.1038/srep2363510.1038/srep23635 ↗
22. Goss WA, Deitz WH, Cook TM (1964) Mechanism of action of nalidixic acid on Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 88:1112–111810.1128/JB.88.4.1112-1118.1964 ↗
23. Gould IM, MacKenzie FM (1997) The response of Enterobacteriaceae to β-lactam antibiotics–’round forms, filaments and the root of all evil’. J Antimicrob Chemother 40:495–499. doi: 10.5694/mja13.1049910.1093/jac/40.4.495 ↗
24. Gu J, Catchmark JM (2012) Impact of hemicelluloses and pectin on sphere-like bacterial cellulose assembly. Carbohydr Polym 88:547–557. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.04010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.040 ↗
25. Haigler CH, Brown RM, Benziman M (1980) Calcofluor white ST Alters the in vivo assembly of cellulose microfibrils. Science 210:903–90610.1126/science.7434003 ↗
26. Harvey RJ, Koch AL (1980) How partially inhibitory concentrations of chloramphenicol affect the growth of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 18:323–337. doi: 10.1128/AAC.18.2.32310.1128/AAC.18.2.323 ↗
27. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–352. doi: 10.1042/bj058034510.1042/bj0580345 ↗
28. Hirai A, Tsuji M, Yamamoto H, Horii F (1998) In situ crystallization of bacterial cellulose III. Influences of different polymeric additives on the formation of microfibrils as revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Cellulose 5:201–213. doi: 10.1023/A:100923332323710.1023/A:1009233323237 ↗
29. Hu Y, Catchmark JM (2010) Formation and characterization of spherelike bacterial cellulose particles produced by Acetobacter xylinum JCM 9730 strain. Biomacromolecules 11:1727–1734. doi: 10.1021/bm100060v10.1021/bm100060v ↗
30. Iyer PR, Geib SM, Catchmark J, Kao TH, Tien M (2010) Genome sequence of a cellulose-producing bacterium, Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 23769. J Bacteriol 192:4256–4257. doi: 10.1128/JB.00588-1010.1128/JB.00588-10 ↗
31. James CE, Mahendran KR, Molitor A, Bolla JM, Bessonov AN, Winterhalter M, Pagès JM (2009) How β-lactam antibiotics enter bacteria: a dialogue with the porins. PLoS ONE 4:10–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.000545310.1371/journal.pone.0005453 ↗
32. Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Cegelski L, Hultgren SJ (2008) Morphological plasticity as a bacterial survival strategy. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:162–168. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro182010.1038/nrmicro1820 ↗
33. Kawano S, Tajima K, Uemori Y (2002) Cloning of cellulose synthesis related genes from Acetobacter xylinum ATCC23769 and ATCC53582: comparison of cellulose synthetic ability between strains. DNA Res 9:149–15610.1093/dnares/9.5.149 ↗
34. Kawano S, Tajima K, Kono H, Numata Y, Yamashita H, Satoh Y, Munekata M (2008) Regulation of endoglucanase gene (cmcax) expression in Acetobacter xylinum. J Biosci Bioeng 106:88–94. doi: 10.1263/jbb.106.8810.1263/jbb.106.88 ↗
35. Kjeldsen TSB, Sommer MOA, Olsen JE (2015) Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli forms filaments as an initial response to cefotaxime treatment. BMC Microbiol 15:63. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0399-310.1186/s12866-015-0399-3 ↗
36. Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Hayete B, Lawrence CA, Collins JJ (2007) A common mechanism of cellular death induced by Bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 130:797–810. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.04910.1016/j.cell.2007.06.049 ↗
37. Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Wierzbowski J, Cottarel G, Collins JJ (2009) Mistranslation of membrane proteins and two-component sytem activation trigger aminoglycoside-mediated oxidative stress and cell death. NIH Public Access 135:679–690. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.03810.1016/j.cell.2008.09.038 ↗
38. Kotra LP, Haddad J, Mobashery S (2000) Aminoglycosides: perspectives on mechanisms of action and resistance and strategies to counter resistance. Antimirob Agents Chemother 44:3249–3256. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.12.3249-3256.200010.1128/AAC.44.12.3249-3256.2000 ↗
39. Lee CM, Gu J, Kafle K, Catchmark JM, Kim SH (2015) Cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strains ATCC 53524 and ATCC 23768: pellicle formation, post-synthesis aggregation and fiber density. Carbohydr Polym 133:270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.09110.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.091 ↗
40. Lorian V (1975) Some effects of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on bacteria. Bull N Y Acad Med 51:1046–1055
41. Minitab (2014) One-way ANOVA. Minitab, Inc. http://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/17/assistant_one_way_anova.pdf . Accessed 17 June 2016
42. Moonmangmee S, Toyama H, Adachi O, Theeragool G, Lotong N, Matsushit K (2002) Purification and characterization of a novel polysaccharide involved in the pellicle produced by a thermotolerant Acetobacter strain. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66:777–783. doi: 10.1271/bbb.66.77710.1271/bbb.66.777 ↗
43. Nakai T, Nishiyama Y, Kuga S, Sugano Y, Shoda M (2002) ORF2 gene involves in the construction of high-order structure of bacterial cellulose. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 295:458–46210.1016/S0006-291X(02)00696-4 ↗
44. Nakai T, Sugano Y, Shoda M, Sakakibara H, Oiwa K, Tuzi S, Imai T, Sugiyama J, Takeuchi M, Yamauchi D, Mineyuki Y (2013) Formation of highly twisted ribbons in a carboxymethylcellulase gene-disrupted strain of a cellulose-producing bacterium. J Bacteriol 195:958–964. doi: 10.1128/JB.01473-1210.1128/JB.01473-12 ↗
45. Nobles DR, Brown RM (2008) Transgenic expression of Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53582 cellulose synthase genes in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus leopoliensis strain UTCC 100. Cellulose 15:691–701. doi: 10.1007/s10570-008-9217-510.1007/s10570-008-9217-5 ↗
46. Purnick PEM, Weiss R (2009) The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:410–422. doi: 10.1038/nrm269810.1038/nrm2698 ↗
47. Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M (1991) Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55:35–5810.1128/MMBR.55.1.35-58.1991 ↗
48. Sauvage E, Derouaux A, Fraipont C, Joris M, Herman R, Rocaboy M, Schloesser M, Dumas J, Kerff F, Nguyen-Distèche M, Charlier P (2014) Crystal structure of penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) from Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 9:1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.009804210.1371/journal.pone.0098042 ↗
49. Saxena IM, Brown RM (2005) Cellulose biosynthesis: current views and evolving concepts. Ann Bot 96:9–21. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci15510.1093/aob/mci155 ↗
50. Saxena IM, Kudlicka K, Okuda K, Brown RM (1994) Characterization of genes in the cellulose-synthesizing operon (acs operon) of Acetobacter xylinum: implications for cellulose crystallization. J Bacteriol 176:5735–575210.1128/jb.176.18.5735-5752.1994 ↗
51. Schlünzen F, Zarivach R, Harms J, Bashan A, Tocilj A, Albrecht R, Yonath A, Franceschi F (2001) Structural basis for the interaction of antibiotics with the peptidyl transferase centre in eubacteria. Nature 413:814–821. doi: 10.1038/3510154410.1038/35101544 ↗
52. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
53. Shwab EK, Keller NP (2008) Regulation of secondary metabolite production in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycol Res 112:225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.02110.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.021 ↗
54. Steel C, Wan Q, Xu XH (2004) Single live cell imaging of chromosomes in chloramphenicol-induced filamentous Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemistry 43:175–182. doi: 10.1021/bi035341e10.1021/bi035341e ↗
55. Sunagawa N, Fujiwara T, Yoda T, Kawano S, Satoh Y, Yao M, Tajima K, Dairi T (2013) Cellulose complementing factor (Ccp) is a new member of the cellulose synthase complex (terminal complex) in Acetobacter xylinum. J Biosci Bioeng 115:607–612. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.12.02110.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.12.021 ↗
56. Szymańska-Chargot M, Cybulska J, Zdunek A (2011) Sensing the structural differences in cellulose from apple and bacterial cell wall materials by Raman and FT-IR Spectroscopy. Sensors 11:5543–5560. doi: 10.3390/s11060554310.3390/s110605543 ↗
57. Uehara T, Dinh T, Bernhardt TG (2009) LytM-domain factors are required for daughter cell separation and rapid ampicillin-induced lysis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 191:5094–5107. doi: 10.1128/JB.00505-0910.1128/JB.00505-09 ↗
58. Valla S, Ertesvag H, Tonouchi N, Fjaervik E (2009) Bacterial cellulose production: biosynthesis and applications. In: Rehm BHA (ed) Microbial production of biopolymers and polymer precursors. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 43–77
59. Wada M, Okano T (2001) Localization of I-α and I-β phases in algal cellulose revealed by acid treatments. Cellulose 8:183–188. doi: 10.1023/A:101319622060210.1023/A:1013196220602 ↗
60. Waxman DJ, Strominger JL (1983) Penicillin-binding proteins and the mechanism of action of β-lactam antibiotics. Annu Rev Biochem 52:825–869. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.00414110.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.004141 ↗
61. Whitney SEC, Wilson E, Webster J, Bacic A, Reid JS, Gidley MJ (2006) Effects of structural variation in xyloglucan polymers on interactions with bacterial cellulose. Am J Bot 93:1402–1414. doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.10.140210.3732/ajb.93.10.1402 ↗
62. Yamanaka S, Sugiyama J (2000) Structural modification of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 7:213–225. doi: 10.1023/A:100920802295710.1023/A:1009208022957 ↗