journal article·2020-09-14Open access

Gap Junction Liposomes for Efficient Delivery of Chemotherapeutics to Solid Tumors

Andrea N. Trementozzi, Stephanie Hufnagel, Haiyue Xu, Mahmoud S. Hanafy, Felipe Rosero Castro, Hugh D.C. Smyth, Zhengrong Cui, Jeanne C. Stachowiak

Abstract

Chemotherapeutic delivery is limited by inefficient transport across cellular membranes. Here, we harness the cellular gap junction network to release therapeutic cargos directly into the cytosol. Specifically, cell-derived vesicles, termed connectosomes, contain gap junction transmembrane proteins that open a direct passageway to the cellular interior. Connectosomes were previously shown to substantially improve chemotherapeutic delivery in vitro. Here, we test connectosomes in vivo, using a murine breast tumor model. We demonstrate that connectosomes improve chemotherapeutic delivery to cellular targets within tumors by up to 16-fold, compared to conventional drug-loaded liposomes, suggesting an efficient alternative pathway for intracellular delivery.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Connexins and lens biology · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Heat shock proteins research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Funding

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nbt.333010.1038/nbt.3330 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev-med-040210-16254410.1146/annurev-med-040210-162544 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.02010.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020 ↗
4. 10.1080/17425247.2016.124418710.1080/17425247.2016.1244187 ↗
5. 10.1186/s40169-017-0175-010.1186/s40169-017-0175-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.03110.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.031 ↗
7. 10.2147/IJN.S59610.2147/IJN.S596 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ajps.2013.07.00110.1016/j.ajps.2013.07.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.01.03610.1016/j.jconrel.2010.01.036 ↗
10. 10.1016/0005-2736(93)90105-910.1016/0005-2736(93)90105-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/0005-2736(95)00159-Z10.1016/0005-2736(95)00159-Z ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.03410.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.034 ↗
13. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.93710.1200/JCO.2005.04.937 ↗
14. 10.1093/annonc/mdh09710.1093/annonc/mdh097 ↗
15. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-034310.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0343 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.6b0519110.1021/jacs.6b05191 ↗
17. 10.1101/cshperspect.a00257610.1101/cshperspect.a002576 ↗
18. 10.1038/sj.jid.570077010.1038/sj.jid.5700770 ↗
19. 10.3389/fonc.2018.0064610.3389/fonc.2018.00646 ↗
20. 10.4172/1948-5956.100017010.4172/1948-5956.1000170 ↗
21. 10.1038/srep1256310.1038/srep12563 ↗
22. 10.1186/1476-4598-9-14110.1186/1476-4598-9-141 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.exer.2018.01.01610.1016/j.exer.2018.01.016 ↗
24. 10.1002/cne.2138810.1002/cne.21388 ↗
25. 10.1242/jcs.0320210.1242/jcs.03202 ↗
26. 10.1016/0014-4827(87)90014-010.1016/0014-4827(87)90014-0 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0038436110.1007/BF00384361 ↗
28. 10.1016/0006-291X(86)90522-X10.1016/0006-291X(86)90522-X ↗
29. 10.1038/nprot.2012.05910.1038/nprot.2012.059 ↗
30. Levental K. R. · 2015 · 6510.1007/978-1-4939-1752-5_6 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20160049310.1002/smll.201600493 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.160937811310.1073/pnas.1609378113 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b0068810.1021/acs.biochem.7b00688 ↗
34. 10.1364/BOE.7.00240010.1364/BOE.7.002400 ↗
35. 10.1002/med.261013040410.1002/med.2610130404 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.05.02810.1016/j.bbamem.2006.05.028 ↗
37. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01567.x10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01567.x ↗
38. 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-003410.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0034 ↗
39. 10.1124/dmd.32.8.79410.1124/dmd.32.8.794 ↗
40. 10.2147/IJN.S2786410.2147/IJN.S27864 ↗