journal article·2016-11-14

Bactericidal Hydrogels via Surface Functionalization with Cecropin A

Megan A. Cole, Timothy F. Scott, Charlene M. Mello

Publisher page

Abstract

The immobilization of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to surfaces, enabling their utilization in biosensor and antibacterial/antifouling coating applications, is typically performed using rigid, solid support materials such as glass or gold and may require lengthy, temperamental protocols. Here, we employ a hydrogel immobilization platform to afford facile fabrication and surface functionalization while offering improved biocompatibility for evaluating the influence of linker length, surface density, and AMP conjugation site on retained peptide activity. Rapid, interfacial photo-polymerization using the radical-mediated thiol–ene addition mechanism was used to generate cross-linked, polymeric coatings bearing residual thiol moieties on prefabricated poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogel supports. The photo-polymerized coatings were 60 μm thick and contained 0.55 nmol of unreacted free thiols, corresponding to a concentration of 410 μM, for use as cecropin A (CPA) immobilization handles via thiol-maleimide conjugation, where the CPA-bound maleimide moiety was localized at either the carboxyl terminus or midsequence between Ala 22 and Gly 23 . Surface presentation of the thiol handles was controlled by varying the thiolated PEG monomer (PEGSH) used in the photo-polymerizable formulation. Bactericidal activity of CPA functionalized hydrogels against E. coli K235 indicated that CPA immobilized at the carboxyl terminus killed 94 ± 6% of the inoculated pathogens when coatings were prepared with high molecular weight PEGSH and 99 ± 1% when prepared with low molecular weight PEGSH. E. coli cell death demonstrated a stronger dependence on peptide concentration than PEG linker length or degree of thiol functionalization, with activity ranging from 34 ± 13% to 99 ± 1% bacterial cells killed as the prefunctionalization thiol concentration in the coatings was increased from 90 to 990 μM. Finally, the immobilization site on the surface-bound CPA strongly affected antibacterial activity; when midsequence modified CPA was bound to a hydrogel coating bearing 990 μM thiol, only 20 ± 4% of the E. coli population was killed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications · Antimicrobial agents and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Natick, Massachusetts 01760, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Macromolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1084/jem.124.3.27910.1084/jem.124.3.279 ↗
2. Fernandez de Caleya R. · Appl. Microbiol. · 1972 · 23 · 99810.1128/am.23.5.998-1000.1972 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb05991.x10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb05991.x ↗
4. 10.1038/ni73210.1038/ni732 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.00810.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008 ↗
6. 10.1074/jbc.M00969120010.1074/jbc.M009691200 ↗
7. Hancock R. E. · Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · 1999 · 43 · 131710.1128/AAC.43.6.1317 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00200-X10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00200-X ↗
9. 10.1074/jbc.273.45.2984710.1074/jbc.273.45.29847 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00018-011-0721-710.1007/s00018-011-0721-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.01710.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.017 ↗
12. Mor A. · J. Biol. Chem. · 1994 · 269 · 3163510.1016/S0021-9258(18)31742-3 ↗
13. 10.1172/JCI11212010.1172/JCI112120 ↗
14. 10.1073/pnas.19230189910.1073/pnas.192301899 ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.88.9.379210.1073/pnas.88.9.3792 ↗
16. Utsugi T. · Cancer Res. · 1991 · 51 · 3062
17. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.080610.1006/bbrc.1996.0806 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.00810.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008 ↗
19. 10.1021/ac050639r10.1021/ac050639r ↗
20. 10.1021/la304174310.1021/la3041743 ↗
21. 10.1002/app.147610.1002/app.1476 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00199-610.1016/S0005-2736(99)00199-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.aca.2006.05.08210.1016/j.aca.2006.05.082 ↗
24. 10.1021/bc800280u10.1021/bc800280u ↗
25. 10.1021/ac300987h10.1021/ac300987h ↗
26. 10.1021/am401629p10.1021/am401629p ↗
27. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.01110.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.02610.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.026 ↗
29. 10.1073/pnas.100876810710.1073/pnas.1008768107 ↗
30. 10.1021/la200388y10.1021/la200388y ↗
31. 10.1021/la401818k10.1021/la401818k ↗
32. 10.1021/bc050091v10.1021/bc050091v ↗
33. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.08.05610.1016/j.bmcl.2007.08.056 ↗
34. 10.1021/am404591n10.1021/am404591n ↗
35. 10.1002/app.2763810.1002/app.27638 ↗
36. 10.1021/am301530a10.1021/am301530a ↗
37. 10.1002/macp.1991.02192101010.1002/macp.1991.021921010 ↗
38. 10.1021/ma800250510.1021/ma8002505 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0076-6879(83)91010-810.1016/S0076-6879(83)91010-8 ↗
40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr23410.1093/bioinformatics/btr234 ↗
41. 10.1038/nprot.2007.52110.1038/nprot.2007.521 ↗
42. Phillips, R.; Kondev, J.; Theriot, J.; Garcia, H. G.InPhysical Biology of the Cell,2nd ed.Scholl, S., Ed.Garland Science:London, 2012; p26.10.1201/9781134111589 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20090392410.1002/anie.200903924 ↗
44. 10.1128/AAC.44.3.602-607.200010.1128/AAC.44.3.602-607.2000 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.194837810.1063/1.1948378 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja01856a06110.1021/ja01856a061 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.172380310.1063/1.1723803 ↗
48. 10.1021/ma034667s10.1021/ma034667s ↗
49. 10.1021/bi00328a01710.1021/bi00328a017 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76398-310.1016/S0006-3495(00)76398-3 ↗
51. 10.1021/bi00420a00810.1021/bi00420a008 ↗
52. 10.1021/bi963082610.1021/bi9630826 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0260010.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02600 ↗
54. 10.1038/nmat291510.1038/nmat2915 ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20120222510.1002/adma.201202225 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0688310.1021/acs.jpcb.5b06883 ↗