Effect of High- and Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic-Acid-Functionalized-AZ31 Mg and Ti Alloys on Proliferation and Differentiation of Osteoblast Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The quality of patient care has increased dramatically in recent years because of the development of lightweight orthopedic metal implants. The success of these orthopedic implants may be compromised by impaired cytocompatibility and osteointegration. Biomimetic surface engineering of metal implants using biomacromolecules including hyaluronic acid (HA) has been used an effective approach to provide conditions favorable for the growth of bone forming cells. To date, there have been limited studies on osteoblasts functions in response to metal substrates modified with the hyaluronic acid of different molecular weight for orthopedic applications. In this study, we evaluated the osteoblasts functions such as adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in response to high- and low-molecular-weight HA (denoted as h-HA and l-HA, respectively) functionalized on Ti (h-HA-Ti and l-HA-Ti substrates, respectively) and corrosion-resistant silane coated-AZ31 Mg alloys (h-HA-AZ31 and l-HA-AZ31). The DNA quantification study showed that adhesion and proliferation of osteoblasts were significantly decreased by h-HA immobilized on Ti or AZ31 substrates when compared to low-molecular-weight counterpart over a period of 14 days. On the contrary, h-HA significantly increased the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast over l-HA, as confirmed by the enhanced expression of ALP, total collagen, and mineralization of extracellular matrix. In particular, the h-HA-AZ31 substrates greatly enhanced the osteoblast differentiation among tested samples (l-HA-AZ31, l-HA-Ti, h-HA-Ti, and Ti alone), which is ascribed to the osteoinductive activity of h-HA, relatively up-regulated intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) and Mg2+ ([Mg2+]i) concentrations as well as the alkalization of the cell culture medium. This study suggesting that HA of appropriate molecular weight can be successfully used to modify the surface of metal implants for orthopedic applications
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Research in Engineering and Surface Technology, Dublin Institute of Technology, Kevin Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
School of Food Science and Environmental Health, Dublin Institute of Technology, Cathal Brugha Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
Funding
Dublin Institute of Technology
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.02010.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10856-007-3160-010.1007/s10856-007-3160-0 ↗
3. 10.1039/C6RA24382G10.1039/C6RA24382G ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.b.3268010.1002/jbm.b.32680 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.019 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.006 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.00210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.01010.1016/j.joen.2016.01.010 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.a.1053510.1002/jbm.a.10535 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.06110.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.061 ↗
11. 10.1038/nrc139110.1038/nrc1391 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0945-053X(01)00184-610.1016/S0945-053X(01)00184-6 ↗
13. 10.1074/jbc.M112.34920910.1074/jbc.M112.349209 ↗
14. 10.1083/jcb.20061105810.1083/jcb.200611058 ↗
15. 10.1186/s13287-016-0399-810.1186/s13287-016-0399-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.00410.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.00210.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.002 ↗
18. 10.1684/mrh.2011.027110.1684/mrh.2011.0271 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.01310.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.013 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.02510.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.025 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0052710.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00527 ↗
22. 10.1039/C0SM00936A10.1039/C0SM00936A ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ab.2003.08.00510.1016/j.ab.2003.08.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.02510.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.025 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5TB02101D10.1039/C5TB02101D ↗
26. 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.11.00410.1016/j.peptides.2017.11.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.01210.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.012 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.08.06210.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.08.062 ↗
29. 10.1533/9781845693121.14710.1533/9781845693121.147 ↗
30. 10.1590/1414-431X2016525710.1590/1414-431X20165257 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.01810.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.018 ↗
32. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/04500210.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045002 ↗
33. 10.1002/jbm.a.3194710.1002/jbm.a.31947 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.019 ↗
35. 10.1073/pnas.040737810210.1073/pnas.0407378102 ↗
36. Dixit, C. K.; Mcdonagh, C.; Maccraith, B. D.; Biophotonics, N.; Platform, I. Surface Modification and Conjugation Strategies for Bioassay/Biomaterial Applications. PhD Thesis, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, November 2011. http://doras.dcu.ie/17151/1/Thesis_Chandra_Dixit_26-07-2012_r.pdf.
37. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.01010.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.010 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.01510.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.015 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.04110.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.041 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.021 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.11110.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.111 ↗
42. 10.1073/pnas.120891610910.1073/pnas.1208916109 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.017 ↗