journal article·2012-08

Is cellulose degradation due to β-elimination processes a threat in mass deacidification of library books?

Kyujin Ahn, Ute Hennniges, Gerhard Banik, Antje Potthast

Cellulose· Volume 19· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

As papers become acidic and brittle over time, libraries apply mass deacidification processes to their collections in order to neutralize acids and deposit an alkaline reserve in the paper. Books commonly treated by mass deacidification have undergone natural aging of up to 150 years. The risk of alkali-induced degradation of cellulosic material upon mass deacidification remains uncertain. In the present study, the extent of β-elimination-type degradation reactions was investigated by comparing deacidified and non-deacidified counterparts, using deacidified library materials and identical issues of non-deacidified books from second-hand book shops. The study dealt with only naturally-aged papers focusing on investigation of immediate effects of mass deacidification rather than a long-term impact. Gel permeation chromatography coupled with carbonyl group labeling gave insight into cellulose chain cleavage as well as into the behavior of oxidized functionalities. Processes occurring under natural aging conditions were compared to those upon artificial oxidation of model pulps. Library books did not show a significant reduction in molecular weight after mass deacidification compared to the non-deacidified controls, which stands in contrast to oxidized model pulps. The models showed a more pronounced loss of molecular weight upon deacidification treatments. A decrease in carbonyl groups other than reducing ends was found to occur. Thus, oxidized functionalities were found to be reactive in mass-deacidification reactions; the different behavior was traced down to particular regions of oxidative damage along the cellulose chains. In general, β-elimination processes did not pose a large risk factor upon mass deacidification treatments of the naturally-aged library material tested.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Building materials and conservation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Andres H, Blüher A, Grossenbacher G, Reist M, Vogelsanger B, Wälchli M (2008) The Papersave Swiss process: quality control and efficacy. Restaurator 28:3–2810.1515/REST.2008.002 ↗
2. Banik G (2004) Evaluation of the efficacy of the CSC Booksaver Process for the deacidification of archives and library materials, based on test treatments at the Preservation Academy Leipzig (PAL). Unpublished report, Staatliche Akademie der Bildenden Künste Stuttgart
3. Banik G (2005) Mass deacidification technology in Germany and its quality control. Restaurator 26:63–7510.1515/REST.2005.63 ↗
4. Blüher A (2006) The alkaline reserve—a key element in paper deacidification. In: Blüher A, Grossenbacher G (eds) Save paper! Mass deacidification—today’s experience—tomorrow’s perspectives. Swiss National Library, Bern, pp 191–206
5. Blüher A, Vogelsanger B (2001) Mass deacidification of paper. Chimia 55:981–98910.2533/chimia.2001.981 ↗
6. Bogaard J, Whitmore PM (2001) Effects of dilute calcium washing treatments on paper. JAIC 40:105–123
7. Bohrn R, Potthast A, Schiehser S, Rosenau T, Sixta H, Kosma P (2006) The FDAM method: determination of carboxyl profiles in cellulosic materials by combining group-selective fluorescence labeling with GPC. Biomacromolecules 7:1743–175010.1021/bm060039h ↗
8. Fengel D, Wegener G (1984) Wood chemistry, ultrastructure, reaction. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp 296–300
9. Gerlach A (2006) Paper deacidification and quality control at the Central and Regional Library Berlin. In: Blüher A, Grossenbacher G (eds) Save paper! Mass deacidification—today’s experience—tomorrow’s perspectives. Bern, Swiss National Library, pp 21–36
10. Grossenbacher G (2006) Paper deacidification as a measure for preserving originals. In: Blüher A, Grossenbacher G (eds) Save paper! Mass deacidification—today’s experience—tomorrow’s perspectives. Bern, Swiss National Library, pp 7–20
11. Hofmann R, Wiesner H (2011) Empfehlung zur Prüfung des Behandlungserfolgs von Entsäuerungsverfahren für säurehaltige Druck- und Schreibpapiere. In: Hofmann R, Wiesner H (eds) Bestandserhaltung in Archiven und Bibliotheken, 3rd edn. Deutsches Institut für Normung Beuth, Berlin, pp 13–36
12. ISO 3688:1999 (2003) Pulps—preparation of laboratory sheets for the measurement of diffuse blue reflectance factor. In: ISO—The International Organization for Standardization (ed) ISO standards for paper, board, and pulps. ISO, Geneva
13. Kelly GB, Tang LC, Krasnow M (1977) Methyl magnesium carbonate—an improved nonaqueous deacidification agent. In: Williams JC (ed) Preservation of paper and textiles of historic and artistic value. Advances in Chemistry Series 164. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 62–71
14. Knill CJ, Kennedy JF (2003) Degradation of cellulose under alkaline conditions. Carbohydr Polym 51:281–30010.1016/S0144-8617(02)00183-2 ↗
15. Kolar J, Novak G (1996) Effect of various deacidification solutions on the stability of cellulose pulps. Restaurator 17:25–3110.1515/rest.1996.17.1.25 ↗
16. Lewin M (1997) Oxidation and ageing of cellulose. Macromol Symp 118:715–72410.1002/masy.19971180192 ↗
17. Libertec Bibliothekendienst GmbH (2007) Das Libertec Verfahren. http://www.libertec.de/verfahren/verfahren.html . Accessed 30 September 2011
18. LOC-Library of Congress (2011) Mass deacidification. http://www.loc.gov/preservation/about/deacid/index.html . Accessed 20 March 2011
19. Malesic J, Kolar J, Strlic M (2002) Effect of pH and carbonyls on the degradation of alkaline paper: factors affecting ageing of alkaline paper. Restaurator 23:145–15310.1515/REST.2002.145 ↗
20. Porck HJ (1996) Mass deacidification—an update of possibilities and limitations. European Commission on Preservation and Access, Netherlands
21. Porck HJ (2006) The Bookkeeper process and its application in the National Library of the Netherlands (KB). In: Blüher A, Grossenbacher G (eds) Save paper! Mass deacidification—today’s experience—tomorrow’s perspectives. Swiss National Library, Bern, pp 37–42
22. Potthast A, Röhrling J, Rosenau T, Borgards A, Sixta H, Kosma P (2003) A novel method for the determination of carbonyl groups in cellulosics by fluorescence labeling. 3. Monitoring oxidative processes. Biomacromolecules 4:743–74910.1021/bm025759c ↗
23. Potthast A, Rosenau T, Kosma P (2006) Analysis of oxidized functionalities in cellulose. In: Klemm D (ed) Polysaccharides II advanced polymer science, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–4810.1007/12_099 ↗
24. Potthast A, Henniges U, Banik G (2008) Iron gall ink-induced corrosion of cellulose: aging, degradation and stabilization. Part 1: model paper studies. Cellulose 15:849–85910.1007/s10570-008-9237-1 ↗
25. Röhrling J, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Lange T, Ebner G, Sixta H et al (2002a) A novel method for the determination of carbonyl groups in cellulosics by fluorescence labeling. 1. Method development. Biomacromolecules 3:959–96810.1021/bm020029q ↗
26. Röhrling J, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Lange T, Borgards A, Sixta H et al (2002b) A novel method for the determination of carbonyl groups in cellulosics by fluorescence labeling. 2. Validation and applications. Biomacromolecules 3:969–97510.1021/bm020030p ↗
27. Stephens CH, Whitmore PM, Morris HR, Smith T (2009) Assessing the risks of alkaline damage during deacidification treatments of oxidized paper. JAIC 48:235–249
28. Stumpf M (2006) Mass deacidification at the North Rhine-Westphalia Archives—experience with the Neschen process. In: Blüher A, Grossenbacher G (eds) Save paper! Mass deacidification—today’s experience—tomorrow’s perspectives. Swiss National Library, Bern, pp 43–57