Sustainable Solvothermal Conversion of Waste Biomass to Functional Carbon Material: Extending Its Utility as a Biocompatible Cosolvent for Lysozyme
Source abstract
Abstract
Functional carbon material synthesis from waste biomass by a sustainable method is of prime importance and has wide variety of applications. Herein, functional carbon materials with structural variability are synthesized using a well-known solvothermal method. The leftover pulp waste biomass (PB) of citrus limetta is converted to functional carbon by treatment with a mixture of choline bitartrate (ChBt) and FeCl3 (1:2 mol ratio) as a solvent. The biomass to solvent ratio is varied as 1:1, 0.8:1, and 0.4:1 during solvothermal treatment to obtain PB-1, PB-2, and PB-3 as functional carbon materials, respectively. On characterization, PB carbon materials were found to be rich in oxygen-containing functional groups possessing different morphologies. Furthermore, results suggested the role of solvent as a soft template and catalyst during the synthesis of carbon materials. The feasibility of synthesized carbon materials as a biocompatible cosolvent for lysozyme was evaluated. In the case of PB-2 material (synthesized using 0.8:1 biomass to solvent ratio), results show an enhancement of lysozyme activity by 150%. Besides, spectroscopic and calorimetric data confirm the preservation of thermal and structural stability of lysozyme in the PB-2 solution. Thus, this study stipulates PB-2 as an excellent cosolvent for protein studies. With this work, we aim to delve into an entirely new arena of applications of biomass in the field of biotechnology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization · Catalysis for Biomass Conversion · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
Funding
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research · University Grants Commission
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C4EE01075B10.1039/C4EE01075B ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.01110.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.12134010.1016/j.biortech.2019.121340 ↗
4. 10.1002/cctc.20150008110.1002/cctc.201500081 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.06110.1016/j.cej.2018.05.061 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.00910.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.01.02910.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.01.029 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12193110.1016/j.cej.2019.121931 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20070136410.1002/adma.200701364 ↗
10. 10.1021/jp809478710.1021/jp8094787 ↗
11. 10.1039/B819318P10.1039/B819318P ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0705410.1021/acsnano.5b07054 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.06410.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.064 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20090281210.1002/adma.200902812 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.02610.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.026 ↗
16. 10.1039/C5RA20916A10.1039/C5RA20916A ↗
17. 10.1039/C8GC01605D10.1039/C8GC01605D ↗
18. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2019.09.00710.1016/j.arabjc.2019.09.007 ↗
19. 10.3390/en1112336610.3390/en11123366 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.01710.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.017 ↗
21. Silvetti T. · 2017 · 23310.1016/B978-0-12-800879-9.00022-6 ↗
22. 10.1080/1040839880952747310.1080/10408398809527473 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.07710.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.077 ↗
24. 10.1039/b900021f10.1039/b900021f ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.09.03610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.09.036 ↗
26. 10.1021/es903141910.1021/es9031419 ↗
27. 10.15376/biores.11.4.9686-970910.15376/biores.11.4.9686-9709 ↗
28. 10.1039/C4RA15296D10.1039/C4RA15296D ↗
29. 10.1007/s12649-018-00554-010.1007/s12649-018-00554-0 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.05110.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.051 ↗
31. 10.1039/C4TA02068E10.1039/C4TA02068E ↗
32. 10.2174/138527282166617102615321510.2174/1385272821666171026153215 ↗
33. 10.1155/2013/62034610.1155/2013/620346 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.10810.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.108 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.01.01810.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.01.018 ↗
36. 10.1021/la801995210.1021/la8019952 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1010115810.3390/ma10101158 ↗
38. 10.1088/2043-6254/aa8b3c10.1088/2043-6254/aa8b3c ↗
39. 10.1080/1745808100369912210.1080/17458081003699122 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.07.01510.1016/j.bbapap.2013.07.015 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.07310.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.073 ↗
42. 10.1021/la903118c10.1021/la903118c ↗
43. 10.1016/j.saa.2012.11.08710.1016/j.saa.2012.11.087 ↗
44. 10.1039/C9TB00009G10.1039/C9TB00009G ↗
45. Lakowicz J. R. · 200610.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 ↗
46. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990420)63:2<242::AID-BIT13>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990420)63:2<242::AID-BIT13>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
47. 10.1073/pnas.96.4.126210.1073/pnas.96.4.1262 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.07.01310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.07.013 ↗
49. 10.1006/abio.1995.995710.1006/abio.1995.9957 ↗
50. 10.3109/07388551.2015.108426310.3109/07388551.2015.1084263 ↗
51. Naidu A. S. · 2000
52. 10.4236/jbnb.2012.3404510.4236/jbnb.2012.34045 ↗
53. Noritomi H. · Int. J. GEOMATE · 2016 · 11 · 2123
54. 10.3390/nano902015210.3390/nano9020152 ↗
55. 10.1021/la049096r10.1021/la049096r ↗
56. 10.1039/C5RA14310A10.1039/C5RA14310A ↗
57. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0212610.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02126 ↗
58. 10.1002/smll.20120250810.1002/smll.201202508 ↗
59. Kurapati R. · Faraday Discuss. · 2020
60. 10.1039/C0NR00779J10.1039/C0NR00779J ↗
61. Tsou C. L. · Biochemistry (Mosc). · 1998 · 63 · 253
62. 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.05.00510.1016/j.procbio.2016.05.005 ↗
63. 10.3390/ijms15122309010.3390/ijms151223090 ↗