Single twin-screw extrusion step to produce highly concentrated MFC powder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Adnan AS, Yahya EB, Olaiya NG, Safrida S, Hossain MS, Balakrishnan V, Gopakumar DA, Abdullah CK, Oyekanmi AA, Pasquini D (2020) A review on plant cellulose nanofibre-based aerogels for biomedical applications. Polymers 12(8):1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1208175910.3390/polym12081759 ↗
2. Ai Y, Zhang L, Cui M, Huang R, Qi W, He Z, Klemeš JJ, Su R (2022) Toward cleaner production of nanocellulose: a review and evaluation. Green Chem 24(17):6406–6434. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC01669A10.1039/D2GC01669A ↗
3. Baati R, Magnin A, Boufi S (2017) High solid content production of nanofibrillar cellulose via continuous extrusion. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(3):2350–2359. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0267310.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02673 ↗
4. Balea A, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C (2019) Nanocelluloses: natural-based materials for fiber-reinforced cement composites. A critical review. Polymers 11(3):518. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1103051810.3390/polym11030518 ↗
5. Banvillet G, Gatt E, Belgacem N, Bras J (2021) Cellulose fibers deconstruction by twin-screw extrusion with in situ enzymatic hydrolysis via bioextrusion. Bioresour Technol 327:124819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.12481910.1016/j.biortech.2021.124819 ↗
6. Banvillet G, Grange C, Curtil D, Putaux J-L, Depres G, Belgacem N, Bras J (2023) Cellulose nanofibril production by the combined use of four mechanical fibrillation processes with different destructuration effects. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-05016-410.1007/s10570-022-05016-4 ↗
7. Boufi S, González I, Delgado-Aguilar M, Tarrès Q, Pèlach MÀ, Mutjé P (2016) Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process: a review. Carbohydr Polym 154:151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.11710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.117 ↗
8. Bouvier J, Campanella OH (2014) Extrusion processing technology: food and non-food biomaterials, 1st edn. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111854168510.1002/9781118541685 ↗
9. Djafari Petroudy SR, Chabot B, Loranger E, Naebe M, Shojaeiarani J, Gharehkhani S, Ahvazi B, Hu J, Thomas S (2021) Recent advances in cellulose nanofibers preparation through energy-efficient approaches: a review. Energies 14(20):Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1420679210.3390/en14206792 ↗
10. Eriksson I, Haglind I, Lidbrandt O, Sahnon L (1991) Fiber swelling favoured by lignin softening. Wood Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0022681310.1007/BF00226813 ↗
11. Fatkhurrohman RHSB, Kusumaatmaja A, Yudhanto F (2020) Extraction and effect of vibration duration in ultrasonic process of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) from ramie fiber. 030004. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.001579410.1063/5.0015794 ↗
12. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
13. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20(1):583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y ↗
14. Freville E, Zeno E, Meyer V, Carré B, Terrien M, Mauret E, Bras J (2024) Process stability optimization of the twin-screw extrusion adapted for concentrated cellulose fibrillation. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-10115-710.1007/s10853-024-10115-7 ↗
15. Heiskanen I, Harlin A, Backfolk K, Laitinen R (2011) Process for production of microfibrillated cellulose in an extruder and microfibrillated cellulose produced according to the process (Patent WO2011051882A1).
16. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43(8):3434–3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 ↗
17. Ho TTT, Abe K, Zimmermann T, Yano H (2015) Nanofibrillation of pulp fibers by twin-screw extrusion. Cellulose 22(1):421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0518-610.1007/s10570-014-0518-6 ↗
18. Holtzapple MT (2003) CELLULOSE. In: Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition. Elsevier, pp 998–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00185-110.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00185-1 ↗
19. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2007) Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 89(2):461–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-007-4175-610.1007/s00339-007-4175-6 ↗
20. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose – its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90(2):735–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
21. Mautner A (2020) Nanocellulose water treatment membranes and filters: a review. Polym Int 69(9):741–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.599310.1002/pi.5993 ↗
22. Meftahi A, Samyn P, Geravand SA, Khajavi R, Alibkhshi S, Bechelany M, Barhoum A (2022) Nanocelluloses as skin biocompatible materials for skincare, cosmetics, and healthcare: formulations, regulations, and emerging applications. Carbohydr Polym 278:118956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11895610.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118956 ↗
23. Missoum K, Bras J, Belgacem MN (2012) Water redispersible dried nanofibrillated cellulose by adding sodium chloride. Biomacromolecules 13(12):4118–4125. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301378n10.1021/bm301378n ↗
24. Mokhena TC, Sadiku ER, Mochane MJ, Ray SS, John MJ, Mtibe A (2021) Mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibril papers and their bionanocomposites: a review. Carbohydr Polym 273:118507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11850710.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118507 ↗
25. Moon R, Johnston L, Land-Hensdal C, Batchelor W (2025) Perspectives on cellulose nanofibril size measurement using scanning electron microscopy. Cellulose 32(5):2793–2810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-025-06458-210.1007/s10570-025-06458-2 ↗
26. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 ↗
27. Nordenström M, Kaldéus T, Erlandsson J, Pettersson T, Malmström E, Wågberg L (2021) Redispersion strategies for dried cellulose nanofibrils. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(33):11003–11010. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0212210.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02122 ↗
28. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-1010.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
29. Pe Iii JA, Mun JS, Mun SP (2022) Thermal characterization of kraft lignin prepared from mixed hardwoods. Bioresour 18(1):926–936. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.1.926-93610.15376/biores.18.1.926-936 ↗
30. Perumal AB, Nambiar RB, Moses JA, Anandharamakrishnan C (2022) Nanocellulose: Recent trends and applications in the food industry. Food Hydrocolloids 127:107484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.10748410.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107484 ↗
31. Portella EH, Romanzini D, Angrizani CC, Amico SC, Zattera AJ (2016) Influence of stacking sequence on the mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of cotton/glass fiber reinforced polyester composites. Mater Res 19:542–547. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-005810.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0058 ↗
32. Ramiah MV (1970) Thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. J Appl Polym Sci 14(5):1323–1337. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1970.07014051810.1002/app.1970.070140518 ↗
33. Rol F (2019) Cellulose pretreatments for a nanofibrillation by twin-screw extrusion. Grenoble Aples, New York
34. Rol F, Banvillet G, Meyer V, Petit-Conil M, Bras J (2018) Combination of twin-screw extruder and homogenizer to produce high-quality nanofibrillated cellulose with low energy consumption. J Mater Sci 53(17):12604–12615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2414-110.1007/s10853-018-2414-1 ↗
35. Rol F, Karakashov B, Nechyporchuk O, Terrien M, Meyer V, Dufresne A, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2017) Pilot-scale twin screw extrusion and chemical pretreatment as an energy-efficient method for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose at high solid content. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(8):6524–6531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0063010.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00630 ↗
36. Rol F, Belgacem N, Meyer V, Petit-Conil M, Bras J (2019a) Production of fire-retardant phosphorylated cellulose fibrils by twin-screw extrusion with low energy consumption. Cellulose 26(9):5635–5651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02447-410.1007/s10570-019-02447-4 ↗
37. Rol F, Saini S, Meyer V, Petit-Conil M, Bras J (2019b) Production of cationic nanofibrils of cellulose by twin-screw extrusion. Ind Crop Prod 137:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.03110.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.031 ↗
38. Rol F, Vergnes B, El Kissi N, Bras J (2020) Nanocellulose production by twin-screw extrusion: simulation of the screw profile to increase the productivity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(1):50–59. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0191310.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01913 ↗
39. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
40. Spear B (2015) Joseph Brahmah – engineer, inventor and prolific patentee. World Pat Inf 40:51–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2015.01.00710.1016/j.wpi.2015.01.007 ↗
41. Suresh Khurd A, Kandasubramanian B (2022) A systematic review of cellulosic material for green electronics devices. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 4:100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2022.10023410.1016/j.carpta.2022.100234 ↗
42. Suzuki K, Okumura H, Kitagawa K, Sato S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2013) Development of continuous process enabling nanofibrillation of pulp and melt compounding. Cellulose 20(1):201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9843-910.1007/s10570-012-9843-9 ↗
43. Taheri H, Hietala M, Oksman K (2020) One-step twin-screw extrusion process of cellulose fibers and hydroxyethyl cellulose to produce fibrillated cellulose biocomposite. Cellulose 27(14):8105–8119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03287-310.1007/s10570-020-03287-3 ↗
44. Tong X, He Z, Zheng L, Pande H, Ni Y (2023) Enzymatic treatment processes for the production of cellulose nanomaterials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 299:120199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12019910.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120199 ↗
45. Wang L, Li K, Copenhaver K, Mackay S, Lamm ME, Zhao X, Dixon B, Wang J, Han Y, Neivandt D, Johnson DA, Walker CC, Ozcan S, Gardner DJ (2021) Review on nonconventional fibrillation methods of producing cellulose nanofibrils and their applications. Biomacromol 22(10):4037–4059. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c0064010.1021/acs.biomac.1c00640 ↗
46. Xu Y, Atrens A, Stokes JR (2020) A review of nanocrystalline cellulose suspensions: rheology, liquid crystal ordering and colloidal phase behaviour. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 275:102076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.10207610.1016/j.cis.2019.102076 ↗