journal article·2023-07Open access

Tribological properties of 100% cellulose nanofiber (CNF) molding under dry- and boundary lubrication-conditions at CNF/steel contacts

H. Okubo, R. Nakae, D. Iba, K. Yamada, H. Hashiba, K. Nakano, K. Sato, S. Sasaki

Cellulose· Volume 30· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), which are plant-derived materials, have recently garnered considerable attention owing to their excellent mechanical properties, such as their low weight and high Young’s modulus. Novel methods for producing 100% CNF bulk structural materials have been developed. However, the tribological properties of CNFs have not been investigated thus far although their mechanical properties are known and are comparable to those of some conventional structural materials. In this study, the tribological properties of a novel biomass material, 100% CNF molding, were investigated based on CNF/steel contacts under dry and boundary lubrication conditions at various temperatures. The friction test results showed that the friction coefficient and wear volume of the CNF molding increased with the test temperature of the CNF/steel tribopair under dry-sliding conditions. Conversely, no significant temperature dependence of the friction and wear properties was observed upon lubrication with a pure polyalfaolefin. The surface analytical results revealed that the amorphization of the CNF molding progressed on the worn surface, especially under dry-sliding conditions at a high temperature. All the results suggested that the friction and wear performance of the 100% CNF moldings strongly depends on the sliding test conditions, and the amorphization process of the CNF molding can affect its friction and wear performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Agarwal UP, Reiner RS, Ralph SA (2010) Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT–Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods. Cellulose 17:721–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9420-z10.1007/s10570-010-9420-z ↗
2. Alexandrescu L, Syverud K, Gatti A, Chinga-Carrasco G (2013) Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures. Cellulose 20:1765–1775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9948-910.1007/s10570-013-9948-9 ↗
3. Barari B, Omrani E, Dorri Moghadam AD, Menezes PL, Pillai KM, Rohatgi PK (2016) Mechanical, physical and tribological characterization of nano-cellulose fibers reinforced bio-epoxy composites: an attempt to fabricate and scale the ‘Green’ composite. Carbohydr Polym 147:282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.09710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.097 ↗
4. Bellemare SC, Dao M, Suresh S (2008) Effects of mechanical properties and surface friction on elastoplastic sliding contact. Mech Mater 40:206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.07.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2007.07.006 ↗
5. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9061-410.1007/s10570-006-9061-4 ↗
6. Bustillos J, Montero D, Nautiyal P, Loganathan A, Boesl B, Agarwal A (2018) Integration of graphene in poly(lactic) acid by 3D printing to develop creep and wear-resistant hierarchical nanocomposites. Polym Compos 39:3877–3888. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2442210.1002/pc.24422 ↗
7. Butchosa N, Zhou Q (2014) Water redispersible cellulose nanofibrils adsorbed with carboxymethyl cellulose. Cellulose 21:4349–4358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0452-710.1007/s10570-014-0452-7 ↗
8. Elseify LA, Midani M, Shihata LA, El-Mously H (2019) Review on cellulosic fibers extracted from date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) and their applications. Cellulose 26:2209–2232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02259-610.1007/s10570-019-02259-6 ↗
9. Gorbacheva SN, Yadykova AY, Ilyin SO (2021) A novel method for producing cellulose nanoparticles and their application as thickeners for biodegradable low-temperature greases. Cellulose 28:10203–10219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04166-110.1007/s10570-021-04166-1 ↗
10. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
11. Kinoshita H, Inada Y, Matsumoto N (2020) Tribological property of cellulose nanofiber water dispersion using various material pairs. JAMDSM 14:JAMDSM0039. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2020jamdsm003910.1299/jamdsm.2020jamdsm0039 ↗
12. Li Q, Renneckar S (2011) Supramolecular structure characterization of molecularly thin cellulose I nanoparticles. Biomacromol 12:650–659. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101315y10.1021/bm101315y ↗
13. Lu JF, Tsai CJ (2014) Hydrothermal phase transformation of hematite to magnetite. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-23010.1186/1556-276X-9-230 ↗
14. Markey L, Janimak JJ, Stevens GC (2001) Modelling and simulation of the permanganic etching of banded spherulite polyethylene: correlation with AFM observations. Polymer 42:6221–6230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00097-010.1016/S0032-3861(01)00097-0 ↗
15. Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym 135:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.03510.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035 ↗
16. Nishitani, Y., Sugawara, N., Kawasaki, K., Kajiyama, T. (2019). Tribological properties of Ureidosilane treated natural fiber reinforced plant-derived Polyamide1010 biomass composites Proceedings of PPS-33. In AIP conference Proceedings, vol. 2139, p. 120001 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121683.10.1063/1.5121683 ↗
17. Okubo H, Yao S (2021) Restoring mechanism of mechanical properties of recycled polyethylene pellet moldings by a repelletizing treatment using a twin-screw extruder. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23:1152–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01204-910.1007/s10163-021-01204-9 ↗
18. Omrani E, Menezes PL, Rohatgi PK (2016) State of the art on tribological behavior of polymer matrix composites reinforced with natural fibers in the green materials world. Eng Sci Technol an Int J 19:717–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.10.00710.1016/j.jestch.2015.10.007 ↗
19. Posada P, Velásquez-Cock J, Gómez-Hoyos C et al (2020) Drying and redispersion of plant cellulose nanofibers for industrial applications: a review. Cellulose 27:10649–10670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03348-710.1007/s10570-020-03348-7 ↗
20. Chuetsu Pulp & Paper CO, Nanoforest LTD Date of reading of 2022/06/16. https://www.chuetsu-pulp.co.jp/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/nanoforest.pdf.
21. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
22. Shalwan A, Yousif BF (2013) In state of art: mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Des 48:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.01410.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.014 ↗
23. Shariatzadeh M, Grecov D (2019) Aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals as water-based lubricants. Cellulose 26:4665–4677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02398-w10.1007/s10570-019-02398-w ↗
24. Wredenberg F, Larsson PL (2009) Scratch testing of metals and polymers: experiments and numerics. Wear 266:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.05.01410.1016/j.wear.2008.05.014 ↗
25. Yang YP, Zhang Y, Lang YX, Yu MH (2017) Structural ATR-IR analysis of cellulose fibers prepared from a NaOH complex aqueous solution. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 213:012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/213/1/01203910.1088/1757-899X/213/1/012039 ↗
26. Zakani B, Salem H, Entezami S, Sedaghat A, Grecov D (2022) Effect of particle concentration on lubrication performance of cellulose nanocrystalline (CNC) water-based lubricants: mixed lubrication regime. Cellulose 29:3963–3984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04510-z10.1007/s10570-022-04510-z ↗