journal article·2025-09-08Open access

Interpenetrating Polymer Network Hydrogel Composition Alters Encapsulated MSC Spreading and In Vivo Degradation Behavior

Liaura Ifergan-Azriel, Orit Bar-Am, Galit Saar, Talia Cohen, Claudia Loebel, Jason A. Burdick, Dror Seliktar

Abstract

An interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) hydrogel was developed for the three-dimensional (3D) culture of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) with the aim of independently controlling cell spreading and material modulus. Based on our previous studies, we formulated a semisynthetic material composed of two networks: a covalent network of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-fibrinogen (PF) and a second guest-host (GH) network of hyaluronic acid (HA) coupled to β-cyclodextrin (CD) and adamantane (Ad). The PF network provided cell attachment, precise control over modulus through the incorporation of additional PEG-diacrylate (PEG-DA) cross-linking, and proteolytic degradability. The GH-HA network contributed to the hydrogel's dynamic properties through enhanced viscoelasticity. This dynamic versatility enabled MSCs to better spread and grow in the IPN, even within highly cross-linked formulations. We also observed that the IPN facilitated significantly faster cell spreading kinetics, independent of the material modulus, when compared to single-network PF hydrogels. Hydrogel biodegradation was also characterized after subcutaneous implantation for up to 8 weeks by using MRI analysis. Increasing the PEG-DA cross-linking of the IPN significantly accelerated the in vivo bioresorption, whereas the biodegradation in single-network PF hydrogels was significantly delayed by the additional PEG-DA. We conclude that the covalent cross-links maintain the bulk structural integrity of the hydrogel, whereas the reversible GH interactions provide more localized adaptability for cell-mediated proteolysis and matrix remodeling, possibly through increased network heterogeneity. This design effectively mimics the ECM by providing a more supportive environment for encapsulated cells that allows them to adhere, spread, and proliferate, which may be useful in various MSC-based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Faculty of Biomedical Engineering

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology

The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion−Israel Institute of Technology, 1 Efron St., Haifa 3109601, Israel

Materials Science & Biomedical Engineering Department

University of Michigan

BioFrontiers Institute and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering

University of Colorado

Funding

United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation · Israel Science Foundation · Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F?rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Division of Materials Research

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.01.01410.1016/j.stem.2018.01.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.00410.1016/j.stem.2018.05.004 ↗
3. 10.1080/1465324060085590510.1080/14653240600855905 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-10530910.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105309 ↗
5. 10.1186/s13045-021-01037-x10.1186/s13045-021-01037-x ↗
6. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_710.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_7 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20190912510.1002/adfm.201909125 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.10310.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.103 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-3-030-76769-310.1007/978-3-030-76769-3 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.121480410.1126/science.1214804 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.151130411210.1073/pnas.1511304112 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41563-019-0307-610.1038/s41563-019-0307-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.02710.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.04610.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.046 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.12.01210.1016/j.stem.2015.12.012 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmat393710.1038/nmat3937 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat358610.1038/nmat3586 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4TB00775A10.1039/C4TB00775A ↗
19. 10.1177/204173141876828510.1177/2041731418768285 ↗
20. 10.1039/C9PY01021A10.1039/C9PY01021A ↗
21. 10.1039/C3CS60040H10.1039/C3CS60040H ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.016 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.04710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.047 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.055 ↗
26. 10.7150/thno.3489810.7150/thno.34898 ↗
27. 10.1155/2015/52536710.1155/2015/525367 ↗
28. 10.1111/jcmm.1318610.1111/jcmm.13186 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.11.03210.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.11.032 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0026610.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00266 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.07810.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.078 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.03010.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.030 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0092310.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00923 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.00710.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.007 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20030490710.1002/adma.200304907 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.06410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.064 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.01.00910.1016/j.actbio.2025.01.009 ↗
38. 10.1039/c2sm06869a10.1039/c2sm06869a ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.004 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.08.04010.1016/j.actbio.2024.08.040 ↗
41. 10.1002/adhm.20240265610.1002/adhm.202402656 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.08.00710.1016/j.tibtech.2020.08.007 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.11.00810.1016/j.tibtech.2009.11.008 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0045210.1021/acs.biomac.7b00452 ↗
45. 10.1002/mabi.20200039810.1002/mabi.202000398 ↗
46. 10.1039/C8TB02593B10.1039/C8TB02593B ↗
47. 10.1089/tea.2007.002910.1089/tea.2007.0029 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.052 ↗
49. 10.1002/adhm.20180143610.1002/adhm.201801436 ↗
50. 10.1002/adem.20098005410.1002/adem.200980054 ↗
51. 10.1038/nprot.2017.05310.1038/nprot.2017.053 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.01710.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.017 ↗
53. 10.1021/bm401280z10.1021/bm401280z ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.02710.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.027 ↗
55. 10.1529/biophysj.107.10584110.1529/biophysj.107.105841 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.03810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.038 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.04610.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.046 ↗
58. 10.1073/pnas.150223211210.1073/pnas.1502232112 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.015 ↗
60. Shachaf Y. · J. Tissue Eng. Regen M · 2014 · 8 · 113
61. 10.1007/s10439-019-02408-910.1007/s10439-019-02408-9 ↗
62. 10.1038/jid.1989.3410.1038/jid.1989.34 ↗
63. 10.1038/nbt105510.1038/nbt1055 ↗
64. 10.1529/biophysj.104.05068210.1529/biophysj.104.050682 ↗
65. 10.1016/S1054-8807(03)00089-910.1016/S1054-8807(03)00089-9 ↗
66. 10.1038/nmat448910.1038/nmat4489 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-210.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
68. 10.1002/term.21910.1002/term.219 ↗
69. 10.1007/s10856-009-3848-410.1007/s10856-009-3848-4 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.01.00410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.01.004 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.01510.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.015 ↗
72. 10.1515/revce-2020-003910.1515/revce-2020-0039 ↗
73. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102179-8.00004-110.1016/B978-0-08-102179-8.00004-1 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12292910.1016/j.polymer.2020.122929 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.04710.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.047 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.016 ↗
77. 10.1002/jbm.a.3754510.1002/jbm.a.37545 ↗
78. 10.1002/mabi.20210036510.1002/mabi.202100365 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.01410.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.014 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.04110.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.041 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.08.00510.1016/j.stem.2020.08.005 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.00710.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.007 ↗
83. 10.1021/la104695m10.1021/la104695m ↗