journal article·2024-03-11

Anatomical Brushite-Coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr Alloy Cage Promotes Cervical Fusion: One-Year Results in Goats

Haiyuan Yang, Fan Zhang, Haocheng Xu, Jin Wang, Hailong Li, Linli Li, Minghao Shao, Hongli Wang, Jia Pei, Jialin Niu, Guangyin Yuan, Feizhou Lyu

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, an anatomical brushite-coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage was fabricated for cervical fusion in goats. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cervical fusion effect and degradation characteristics of this cage in goats. The Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage was fabricated based on anatomical studies, and brushite coating was prepared. Forty-five goats were divided into three groups, 15 in each group, and subjected to C2/3 anterior cervical decompression and fusion with tricortical bone graft, Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage, or brushite-coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage, respectively. Cervical radiographs and computed tomography (CT) were performed 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Blood was collected for biocompatibility analysis and Mg 2+ concentration tests. The cervical spine specimens were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively for biomechanical, micro-CT, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy, laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and histological analysis. The liver and kidney tissues were obtained for hematoxylin and eosin staining 12 months after surgery for biosafety analysis. Imaging and histological analysis showed a gradual improvement in interbody fusion over time; the fusion effect of the brushite-coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage was comparable to that of the tricortical bone graft, and both were superior to that of the Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage. Biomechanical testing showed that the brushite-coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage achieved better stability than the tricortical bone graft at 12 months postoperatively. Micro-CT showed that the brushite coating significantly decreases the corrosion rate of the Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage. In vivo degradation analysis showed higher Ca and P deposition in the degradation products of the brushite-coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage, and no hyperconcentration of Mg was detected. Biocompatibility analysis showed that both cages were safe for cervical fusion surgery in goats. To conclude, the anatomical brushite-coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy cage can promote cervical fusion in goats, and the brushite-coated Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy is a potential material for developing absorbable fusion cages.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China

National Engineering Research Center of Light Alloy Net Forming and State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composite, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/BRS.000000000000091310.1097/BRS.0000000000000913 ↗
2. Smith, G. W.; Robinson, R. A. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1958, 40-a(3), 607–624, 10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009.10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009 ↗
3. 10.1016/J.ESAS.2010.01.00310.1016/J.ESAS.2010.01.003 ↗
4. 10.1097/BRS.000000000000292510.1097/BRS.0000000000002925 ↗
5. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.90099210.3389/fbioe.2022.900992 ↗
6. 10.1186/s12891-016-1234-110.1186/s12891-016-1234-1 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00586-022-07272-110.1007/s00586-022-07272-1 ↗
8. 10.1097/00007632-200212010-0001010.1097/00007632-200212010-00010 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.11148910.1016/j.bios.2019.111489 ↗
10. 10.3928/01477447-20140124-1310.3928/01477447-20140124-13 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00586-011-2002-410.1007/s00586-011-2002-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.02210.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.022 ↗
13. 10.1002/advs.20190244310.1002/advs.201902443 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jma.2021.06.02410.1016/j.jma.2021.06.024 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.01310.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.013 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.151823811310.1073/pnas.1518238113 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0109710.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01097 ↗
18. 10.1097/BRS.000000000000050710.1097/BRS.0000000000000507 ↗
19. 10.1155/2018/796150910.1155/2018/7961509 ↗
20. 10.1186/s12891-018-2027-510.1186/s12891-018-2027-5 ↗
21. 10.21037/atm-20-22510.21037/atm-20-225 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.002 ↗
23. 10.1177/03946320120250030610.1177/039463201202500306 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.02610.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.026 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.00810.1016/j.msec.2013.08.008 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21350510.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213505 ↗
27. 10.21037/atm-22-209810.21037/atm-22-2098 ↗
28. 10.1089/ten.TEC.2022.013310.1089/ten.TEC.2022.0133 ↗
29. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dfcec910.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dfcec9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.01010.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.010 ↗
31. 10.3171/SPI-07/11/54910.3171/SPI-07/11/549 ↗
32. 10.1186/s12891-021-04412-410.1186/s12891-021-04412-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.02010.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.03010.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.030 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.01210.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.012 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jot.2020.11.00710.1016/j.jot.2020.11.007 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.11996210.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119962 ↗
38. 10.1007/s40204-022-00182-x10.1007/s40204-022-00182-x ↗
39. 10.1002/smll.20190448610.1002/smll.201904486 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jma.2022.05.02310.1016/j.jma.2022.05.023 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.00710.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.007 ↗
42. 10.1111/ijac.1230110.1111/ijac.12301 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.01910.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.019 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10195-011-0169-410.1007/s10195-011-0169-4 ↗
45. Erinc, M; Sillekens, W. H.; Mannens, R.; Werkhoven, R. J. Applicability of existing magnesium alloys as biomedical implant materials; proceedings of the Magnesium Technology Symposium 2009, San Francisco, CA, F Feb 15–19, 2009 [C]; Minerals, Metals & Materials Soc: Warrendale, 2009.
46. 10.3390/ma1419555010.3390/ma14195550 ↗