journal article·2023-08-14

Effect of Mechanical Loading on Bone Regeneration in HA/β-TCP/SF Scaffolds Prepared by Low-Temperature 3D Printing In Vivo

Ruixin Li, Wei Cheng, Hao Liu, Rui Luo, Huiru Zou, Linkun Zhang, Tingting Ren, Cheng Xu

Publisher page

Abstract

It has been well demonstrated that a dynamic culture environment improves tissue-engineered bone formation in vitro, but little is known about how cyclical mechanical loading induced bone formation in scaffolds in situ . To mimic the organic and inorganic components and multilevel structure of a bony microenvironment, hydroxyapatite/β tricalcium phosphate/silk fibroin(HA/β-TCP/SF) composite scaffolds with macro- and micropores were fabricated in this study. The mechanical properties and structure of the scaffolds were adjusted based on the ratio of organic and inorganic components and three-dimensional (3D) printing parameters. Dynamic sinusoidal loading with different frequencies was applied to the composite scaffold. Mouse bone precursor cells MC3T3-E1 were seeded on the scaffolds, and the cell compatibility of the scaffolds was investigated by MTT, SEM, and HE. The effect of the loading on bone formation in the scaffold in situ was investigated in a rabbit tibia defect model. The scaffold showed viscoelasticity and hysteresis under dynamic sinusoidal loading with different frequencies. With an increase in HA/β-TCP, the stress and modulus of the scaffolds increased. MTT, SEM, and HE results showed that MC3T3-E1 cells could adhere and proliferate on the composite scaffolds. After loading in vivo, the quantity of newly formed bone and the bone volume fraction increased. Micro-CT, undecalcified Van Gieson (VG) staining, and fluorescent double-labeling results suggested that appropriate cyclical mechanical loading at frequencies of 1 and 10 Hz had positive effects on bone formation in situ and it may play a role in clinical bone defect repair.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Function Reconstruction, Tianjin Stomatological Hospital, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin 300041, China

People’s Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450003, China

China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment, Beijing 100062, China

Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90247-710.1016/S0140-6736(99)90247-7 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00170-012-4605-210.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13096110.1016/j.cej.2021.130961 ↗
4. 10.1007/s42242-019-00046-710.1007/s42242-019-00046-7 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.1c2286810.1021/acsami.1c22868 ↗
6. 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90091-210.1016/0021-9290(89)90091-2 ↗
7. 10.1055/s-0028-114410610.1055/s-0028-1144106 ↗
8. 10.1002/jor.2023010.1002/jor.20230 ↗
9. 10.1542/peds.112.6.e44710.1542/peds.112.6.e447 ↗
10. 10.1002/bip.2153710.1002/bip.21537 ↗
11. 10.2106/JBJS.K.0160410.2106/JBJS.K.01604 ↗
12. 10.1002/jor.2204210.1002/jor.22042 ↗
13. 10.22203/eCM.v019a0510.22203/eCM.v019a05 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.09.04010.1016/j.bone.2011.09.040 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.118893610.1126/science.1188936 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbmr.565007021610.1002/jbmr.5650070216 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.10.00610.1016/j.medengphy.2012.10.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.01610.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.016 ↗
19. 10.1186/s12938-015-0114-510.1186/s12938-015-0114-5 ↗
20. 10.1097/00002142-200210000-0000310.1097/00002142-200210000-00003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.02610.1016/j.bone.2009.05.026 ↗
22. 10.1021/bm050431f10.1021/bm050431f ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.10.00410.1016/j.tibtech.2004.10.004 ↗
24. 10.1108/1355254061068274110.1108/13552540610682741 ↗
25. Michael A. K. L. · 2012
26. 10.1007/s10856-007-3004-y10.1007/s10856-007-3004-y ↗
27. 10.1002/polb.1995.09033140210.1002/polb.1995.090331402 ↗
28. 10.1159/00032398710.1159/000323987 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.01010.1016/j.bone.2005.06.010 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.044 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.049 ↗
32. 10.1159/00033836210.1159/000338362 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.07.01010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.07.010 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.05810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.058 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.00110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.001 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.04710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.047 ↗
37. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<446::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<446::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
38. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17<3130::AID-ANIE3130>3.0.CO;2-110.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17<3130::AID-ANIE3130>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.02510.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.025 ↗
40. 10.1023/A:102287242133310.1023/A:1022872421333 ↗
41. 10.1002/jbm.a.3011710.1002/jbm.a.30117 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00619-710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00619-7 ↗
43. Liu L. · Bioengineering · 2012 · 5 · 427
44. 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.91810.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.918 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.bone.2003.11.01110.1016/j.bone.2003.11.011 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.04.01010.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.04.010 ↗
47. 10.1371/journal.pone.001117810.1371/journal.pone.0011178 ↗
48. 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.026510.1089/ten.tea.2012.0265 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.110701910810.1073/pnas.1107019108 ↗